Vision Shanghai Five offers
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
26 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 February 2013, Friday 2 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

Vision Shanghai Five offers

Turkey becoming a member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) has been widely discussed since Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said the country is seriously considering becoming part of the organization, which he considers an alternative at a time when the EU's future looks increasingly dim.

Many in Turkey question the logic of becoming a member to the Shanghai Five, arguing that Turkey should not give up its EU bid while boosting its relations with Central Asian and Pacific countries at the same time.

Star's Fehmi Koru argues that being close to the Shanghai Five will surely have benefits for Turkey. But if it costs Turkey its relations with the EU, then we should rather not have it, Koru says. Commenting on Erdoğan's signal that Turkey might join the Shanghai Five, US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland recently said that it would obviously be interesting, given the fact that Turkey is also a NATO member. “It would be more meaningful if an EU official delivered a comment on Erdoğan's statement instead of Nuland. That way, we could discuss why they are always coming up with obstacles to Turkey's EU membership. But what I cannot understand here is what Turkey's NATO membership has to do with Turkey's possible Shanghai Five membership. In addition, is Russia not among the countries that joined NATO's Partnership for Peace program? If being a member to NATO does not contribute to Turkey's EU bid, then why would it be an obstacle for Turkey when seeking other groups to cooperate with? There is a serious flaw in this logic,” the columnist says.

Sami Kohen from Milliyet says Turkey's EU bid is not just about the economic advantages the EU will bring; Turkey hoped EU membership would contribute to Turkey's democratization and modernization process as well. This was the main vision the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) gave priority to since it came to power in 2002. On the other hand, the SCO is not an organization based on the same values and principles as the EU. Shanghai Five members like China, Russia and other countries in Central Asia are ruled by authoritarian regimes and human rights, freedom of expression and other democratic values are not at the forefront in these countries. Thus, focusing on the Shanghai Five rather than the EU means a change in Turkey's ideal values and principles. Also, the SCO does not really comply with Turkey's foreign policy, either. The latest example of this was that Turkey's stance on the Syrian crisis was the exact opposite of that of Russia and China. It is a fact that Asian and Pacific countries are on the rise and Turkey needs to adopt a policy in line with this fact. But we don't necessarily have to be a member of the SCO and turn our back to Europe and the West for that, Kohen says.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
24 May 2013
Game-changer for Syria
23 May 2013
Syrian puzzle
22 May 2013
AK Party’s Plans B and C for constitution
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
25 January 2013
The CHP in contradiction with its leftist image
24 January 2013
Shadow cast over peace plans
23 January 2013
Paris killings get even more complicated
22 January 2013
Not Kurdish problem, democracy problem
21 January 2013
Good signs
20 January 2013
Turkey's struggle against its phobias
18 January 2013
First test on the long road to peace
17 January 2013
Six answers to ‘Why now'
...