Kılıçdaroğlu's choice
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 January 2013, Sunday 2 0 0 0
MARKAR ESAYAN
m.esayan@todayszaman.com

Kılıçdaroğlu's choice

Turkey has been discussing horrible remarks made by Republican People's Party (CHP) İzmir deputy Birgül Ayman Güler in a session of Parliament, where the right to defense in one's native language has been under deliberation for some time.

Güler made the following statement, which was included in Parliament records: “You cannot make me accept Kurdish nationalism as progressiveness or eagerness for independence. You cannot make me view the Turkish nation as equal to the Kurdish nation.”

In response to this remark, Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) deputy İdris Baluken said, “We are not nationalists, but you are neo-nationalists.” The CHP's Güler further said: “My dear friends, this is the only thing that emerged out of the cooperation between the Justice and Development Party [AKP] and the BDP. There is no Kurdish question in Turkey. You made the problem a Turkish issue in this country.”

The CHP and Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) members of Parliament frantically applauded Güler after these remarks. CHP Adıyaman deputy Salih Fırat, who resigned from this party in the aftermath of this incident, said that he made this decision because of the applause. This is important because it is ordinary to hear such remarks from anybody attached to any political party. However, the strong support coupled with applause by CHP members influenced his decision.

After this incident, all eyes were on CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu. After a while, he made a statement. The next day, he met with Güler and said that her remarks were unacceptable. However, he was not convincing and decisive enough, Güler said after the meeting that she did not consider resignation, that Fırat's resignation had nothing to do with her statements and that she was still holding the same thoughts on the matter.

Since coming to power, Kılıçdaroğlu has been making strong references to the discourse of the new CHP. However, he failed to fully describe this discourse; he failed to make a choice between the neo-nationalists within the party and the reformists. Güler's remarks are not coincidental. It is a strong reaction within the party by the neo-nationalist wing vis-à-vis the CHP's support for the new İmralı process. The neo-nationalists within the party are mad angry at the CHP's support for the peace talks with the PKK; and they made their statement and point by causing a crisis via Güler's racist remarks at a time when the right to defend oneself in one's native language was being deliberated in Parliament.

Even if he removes Güler, Kılıçdaroğlu will not be able to undermine the power of the neo-nationalists in this party. What he needs to do is to define his policy clearly and offer a proper description of the new CHP. In case he does this decisively and remains attached to it, those who are uneasy with it will leave the party. But if you imply you are a neo-nationalist and then argue that you are also a democrat, no one will believe you. You cannot be supported by the neo-nationalists or the democrats. This is why the CHP has turned into a club of those who dislike the AK Party rather than a proper political party. During the leadership of Deniz Baykal, the party at least had a neo-nationalist-fascist discourse and policy. The present-day CHP is unable to define its neo-nationalist or democratic identity.

It is neurotic to, while going through a process of change on one hand, support the former regime, which the process of change is waging a battle against in the first place. Who can believe remarks made the leader of a political party -- saying that they are ready to do anything to resolve the Kurdish issue -- which has so many racist deputies, including Güler?

In fact, if Kılıçdaroğlu could be bold enough and side with the reformists within the party, he would reinforce his position and Turkey would have a strong main opposition party as well because the former CHP cannot possibly survive in the new Turkey.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
22 May 2013
An Armenian from Turkey in Los Angeles...
19 May 2013
National unity and solidarity
17 May 2013
No libretto for history?
15 May 2013
Why all this violence?
12 May 2013
Turkey has to grow up
10 May 2013
Polarization and deep state
8 May 2013
Turkey's dilemma
5 May 2013
Getting rid of this shame
3 May 2013
What happened in Taksim on May 1?
1 May 2013
Is 1915 genocide or what?
28 April 2013
My father
26 April 2013
It's now democratization's turn
24 April 2013
Exit from a well 1,915 meters deep
21 April 2013
How should the events of 1915 be perceived
19 April 2013
This is almost the end for Kılıçdaroğlu
17 April 2013
All that is solid melts into air
14 April 2013
Without creating new ‘others'
12 April 2013
Will anything good come from Muslims?
10 April 2013
The price CHP pays for its stance
7 April 2013
As the CHP is dragged towards euthanasia
3 April 2013
Significance of new constitution for Turkey
31 March 2013
Gökçeada Greek Primary School and ghosts from the past
29 March 2013
The butterfly effect of the solution
27 March 2013
Leyla Zana's contribution to peace
24 March 2013
Hizmet movement and the peace process
22 March 2013
As the poisonous parentheses close
20 March 2013
If there was no Ergenekon trial
18 March 2013
CHP, not Turkey, will be partitioned
15 March 2013
Redeeming democracy
13 March 2013
CHP and peace
10 March 2013
The big peace gong has not rung yet
6 March 2013
Chemistry of and roadblocks to solution
3 March 2013
The provocations that have come to nothing
1 March 2013
When will big peace come?
27 February 2013
Kurdish politics on a test drive
24 February 2013
Logic of peace
22 February 2013
Are we really getting closer to peace?
20 February 2013
Transformation of nationalism
17 February 2013
Kurds, Muslims and neo-nationalists
15 February 2013
The CHP's İmralı ‘correction'
13 February 2013
Baykal coup in the CHP
10 February 2013
The dignity of politics and the deep state
8 February 2013
Opportunity for urban transformation
6 February 2013
Getting rid of the straitjacket
3 February 2013
Problems exhausted too
1 February 2013
Turkey's CHP problem
30 January 2013
Turkish issue and the CHP
27 January 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's choice
25 January 2013
Why can't we postpone the reforming of the state?
23 January 2013
Paris killings and their wake
20 January 2013
A tough week
18 January 2013
Dink case and democratization
16 January 2013
Post-PKK Turkey
13 January 2013
The PKK issue and provocations
11 January 2013
Supreme Court head prosecutor: Dink killed by an organization
9 January 2013
Tragedy in Zonguldak
6 January 2013
The new process
2 January 2013
While the deep state waits…
30 December 2012
Polarization and stability
28 December 2012
The state apparatus resurfaced
26 December 2012
What is deep state?
23 December 2012
Coup changes appearance
19 December 2012
Human rights struggle in the new age
16 December 2012
As the state tries itself
14 December 2012
Search for common sense in AK Party
12 December 2012
What were in those reports?
9 December 2012
Let us make sure history does not repeat itself
7 December 2012
Turkey in past decade and past week
5 December 2012
The Kurdish issue and populism
2 December 2012
Turkey: a country of paradoxes
30 November 2012
What is Turkey’s role in the imminent comeback of the East?
28 November 2012
Why can’t we make a new constitution?
25 November 2012
Özal: Once again
23 November 2012
Where does Kenan Evren’s self-confidence come from?
21 November 2012
Gaza and three possibilities
18 November 2012
Price of delay: paid
16 November 2012
Mastering time and price of delay
14 November 2012
Death penalty debate and questions
11 November 2012
Golden Age or Stone Age?
9 November 2012
Key to a victory: politics of non-deception
7 November 2012
A radical package
4 November 2012
Özal and the Kurdish issue
2 November 2012
Changing the factory settings: thoughts on the AK Party and the Turkish Republic
31 October 2012
Continued reforms or chaos?
28 October 2012
Hunger strikes and political constriction
24 October 2012
Link between economy and democracy
21 October 2012
Murder of Christian missionaries and the deep state
19 October 2012
The importance of coup trials
17 October 2012
Why is EU membership important?
14 October 2012
We could have shared the Nobel
12 October 2012
EU progress report and recent times in Turkey
10 October 2012
A deus ex machina: Recep Güven
7 October 2012
No to war… but
5 October 2012
Turkish foreign policy and Syria
3 October 2012
Differences between two speeches
30 September 2012
Turkey's red lines
26 September 2012
Post Balyoz, pressure mounts on Court
23 September 2012
Turkey's future and the Balyoz decision
21 September 2012
Turkey’s military problem
19 September 2012
Kılıçdaroğlu’s Menderes visit
...