Demirel, counter-guerilla and US
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
24 May 2013 Friday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 January 2013, Sunday 0 0 0 0
ORHAN OĞUZ GÜRBÜZ
o.gurbuz@todayszaman.com

Demirel, counter-guerilla and US

The term “deep state,” which recently triggered a national debate after being referred to in a recent statement by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, still exists.

 It is not easy to combat this structure, the prime minister said in that statement, which raised hopes. What was this hope? This was actually a response by the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) to the public suggesting that criticisms after disappointment and confusion were ungrounded. The AK Party’s willingness to suspend structural reforms and its aversion to fighting against the deep state raised some suspicions among those who were expecting change.

Now let us take a look at the practical meaning of this statement and think about whether we could still keep our hopes. In its classified and confidential note and letter, which was sent to the parliamentary Coup and Memorandum Investigation Commission on Dec. 24 , 2012, on the special forces command, the mobilization inspection board and the search and rescue unit in battle, the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) reveals plans drafted by those who wanted to overthrow the AK Party and prepare the ground for a military coup. According to a news report by the Taraf daily on Jan. 17, 2013, one of the initiatives by the Special Warfare Unit is a plan to reshape the Republican Peoples’ Party (CHP).

The letter, which notes that the CHP fails to act as an influential opposition party, also states that the party should be restructured internally. The letter also includes instructions on setting up an organization to start the process of restructuring. It is interesting to note that the letter was written before the leak of the secret Deniz Baykal video on the Internet.

It is useful to recall some of the items in the 26-article operation plan referred to in the letter addressed by the intelligence agency on the special warfare unit’s activities. The articles include actions that would provoke splits between Turks and Kurds, Alevis and Sunnis, seculars and non-seculars by relying on different methods, including print media, detonating bombs in critical spots, including on the Bosporus Bridge, the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, the Bolu Mountain Tunnel, the Yalova ferry and along the Black Sea highway in an attempt to raise distrust in the government and the state, exacerbating social tension and polarization via coordinated assassination attempts vis-à-vis leading names, including Türkan Saylan, Tuncay Özkan, Bülent Arınç and Abdullah Gül.

You may ask about if there is a link between former President and Prime Minister Süleyman Demirel and this letter and the discussion over a counter-guerilla body. I would like to remind you of his reactions in this discussion on counter-terrorism as opposition leader and prime minister.

“I invite the head of the government to explain the counter-guerilla [body] and what it is linked to,” said Demirel, as leader of the main opposition Justice Party (AP), on Feb. 1, 1978.

“There is no place for such organizations and structures in a state governed by the rule of law,” said Tansu Çiller, the chairwoman of the True Path Party (DYP).

“There is no place for the counter-guerilla discussion in Turkey as well. It is said that this issue should be investigated; fine, let us also investigate whether the sun will rise tomorrow,” said Demirel on Feb. 24, 1993.

I think these remarks by Demirel changing depending on the conjuncture are exemplary of the precarious stance of the Turkish politicians vis-à-vis the deep state. What would we have if we consider the intelligence agency report and the remark by Nimet Baş from the AK Party, the chairwoman of the parliamentary Coup and Memorandum Investigation Commission, suggesting that counter-guerilla has 100,000 active members in Turkey?

In a classified document he sent to the commission, Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz confirmed on Jan. 19, 2012, the existence of a counter-guerilla body within the special warfare command. This means that our political elites admit the existence of counter-guerilla in their public statements whereas they also provide legal protection for this structure by telling the judiciary that it does not exist. It is useful for us and the politicians to remember Demirel.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
First, there was justice
12 May 2013
Democratic checks and human rights
5 May 2013
Piri Reis and ayran nationalism
28 April 2013
Domestic, socialist, Ottoman: Kemal Tahir
21 April 2013
Özal’s legacy
14 April 2013
The enemy in the mirror
7 April 2013
Islamic scholars and peace
31 March 2013
March 31 incident and Abdülhamid II
24 March 2013
Exit from Ergenekon: a constitution
17 March 2013
Hostage to politics
10 March 2013
City, identity and migration
3 March 2013
Feb. 28 spirit and feeling sorry for your hitman
24 February 2013
There are judges in Silivri
17 February 2013
The dangers of a wounded guardian authority
10 February 2013
Education and culture in the 2023 vision
3 February 2013
Does democracy have a backup?
27 January 2013
Demirel, counter-guerilla and US
20 January 2013
Parties without politics
13 January 2013
From the Unionists’ 1913 Babıali raid to now
6 January 2013
Is a new constitution possible in the new year?
30 December 2012
‘Waiting for suitable conditions’
23 December 2012
Democratic media and the Taraf daily
16 December 2012
Populist nationalism and militarism
9 December 2012
Conservatism and the defeat of pleasure
25 November 2012
How will Sept. 12 trial end?
18 November 2012
Politics in a tight space
4 November 2012
‘Republican regime not destroyed by walks and marches’
21 October 2012
Do we throw away EU membership or democracy?
14 October 2012
Who learned their Feb. 28 lesson?
7 October 2012
The age of Eric Hobsbawm
30 September 2012
Balyoz is over; is guardianship?
23 September 2012
The Menderes legacy: lessons on ‘guardian mentality’
16 September 2012
Xenophobia and the Zirve case
9 September 2012
Did Breivik deserve Europe?
2 September 2012
What does the ‘National Agreement’ move target?
26 August 2012
Did the European Union project collapse?
19 August 2012
Only a civilian constitution can foil this scheme
12 August 2012
Islamism and cultural void
5 August 2012
Is AK Party creditor and Gül debtor?
29 July 2012
Kılıçdaroğlu under the shadow of the CHP
22 July 2012
AK Görüş
15 July 2012
Guardian authority and fish
...