Message of Paris slayings
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 13 January 2013, Sunday 0 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

Message of Paris slayings

Last week, three female Kurdish activists, including Sakine Cansız, a co-founder of the terrorist Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), were shot dead in central Paris in what authorities are calling an execution.

This comes at a time when Turkey is holding peace talks with PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan, imprisoned on İmralı Island, to try to persuade him to get the terrorist group to lay down its arms. The killings set off a round of accusations, with each side accusing the other of being behind the killings. However, until the perpetrators and motive behind the attack are revealed, columnists remain uncertain whether it was an attempt to sabotage the talks.

Provocative acts take place in Turkey whenever peace talks are on the table; we have seen this many times in the past. As for the latest such act in Paris, the Sabah daily's Mahmut Övür says Cansız was known to be a pro-peace figure within the PKK. And, more importantly, Cansız lent great support to Öcalan's meetings with the government to end the war between the PKK and the state. Therefore, it is meaningful that Cansız was a target. According to Övür, this means that some PKK wings opposed to peace are sending the messages that “the PKK is powerless without arms” and that “if you lay down your arms you will be shot” to the rest of the PKK. Övür also argues that the bullets that killed the three women in Paris were in a way also fired at Öcalan. Picking victims from the Kurdish diaspora in Europe is also meaningful as these people have remained opposed to meetings with the government. So, Övür believes the aim of the slayings was to raise anger among the Kurdish diaspora and derail the talks.

Kurtuluş Tayiz from the Taraf daily wrote that there have not actually been any concrete findings in the murders in Paris that show a link between them and the negotiations taking place on İmralı. But the first thing that came to people's minds when they heard about the slayings was the negotiations. Perhaps this is a correctly drawn link, Tayiz wrote, but the first idea that pops up into our heads usually stems from our biggest fears. “The linking of the slayings in Paris to the negotiations on İmralı is fed mostly by our political and social concerns. And our biggest political and social fear is that the possibility of peace and a solution to the Kurdish and PKK issues could be ruined by an act of sabotage. All political sides in the nation share this fear,” Tayiz wrote.

In his article titled “To be provoked or not to be provoked. That is the question,” Demiray Oral, another columnist for Taraf, said it does not really matter much who perpetrated the attack. According to Turkish nationalists, the PKK is the perpetrator; according to Kurdish nationalists the deep state is responsible; however, regardless of who perpetrated the crime, we know with certainty that they are against any democratic change in Turkey and will stage additional attacks to this end. What is really important now is how determined both sides are in the talks to bring peace to our beloved country.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
3 June 2013
Gezi Park reactions
31 May 2013
Controversy over bridge's name
30 May 2013
Third bridge over Bosporus
29 May 2013
Worries about the alcohol ban
28 May 2013
Realpolitik in Syria
27 May 2013
May 27, Turkey's first coup
27 May 2013
Realpolitik in Syria
26 May 2013
Contentious ban on alcohol
24 May 2013
Game-changer for Syria
23 May 2013
Syrian puzzle
22 May 2013
AK Party’s Plans B and C for constitution
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
...
Bloggers