Who wants peace?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 May 2013 Monday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 10 January 2013, Thursday 1 0 0 0
ORHAN MİROĞLU
o.miroglu@todayszaman.com

Who wants peace?

Currently in Turkey, the horizon holds what appears to be the possibility of peace. Of course, there are those who do not wish to see peace and, in fact, if we look at what has been written and said in the past two weeks, we see lists of the “official views” held by those terrified by the prospect of such peace. I will leave for another day my thoughts on who does not want peace and why they don't want it. Today, I want to write about those who do want peace.

The elected government wants to end the Kurdish war, bringing to life a Turkey wherein armed people do not populate the mountain ranges. The prime minister and the government want peace.

The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) voters, or half of all the Kurds and Turks in Turkey, want peace. These are the same people who lent their support to the government during the constitutional reform process and in the reforms that led to a new recognition of the Kurdish identity.

As for the “revolutionary people's war” that has led to the loss of 1,400 lives and has been carried out by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) since the attacks at Silvan, it has not produced the results so desired by those who do not want peace and those who want to see Kurds “remain in an atmosphere of conflict and war psychology.” What's more, Kurds themselves are not declaring, “Alright, that's enough, we can no longer live with Turks,” before moving to abandon large cities like İstanbul, Mersin, Adana and İzmir. Nor have these Kurds taken up arms to form “real defense forces” in big cities throughout Turkey. The recent Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) operations had a significant effect in disabling the capabilities of the armed protest wing of the PKK. This was despite the fact that PKK leaders had asserted that they would be bringing the war to large Turkish cities. But neither Kurds nor Turks bowed to this strategy. Turks did not say: “50,000 have been killed, there are 3,000 villages that have been erased from the map and you are still in pursuit of war and still trying to see one-sided autonomy being declared in Diyarbakır. We don't want you here anymore; go somewhere else if you want warfare.”

Those who would have loved to see such an ethnic war have been deflated and disappointed; despite all the disaster scenarios and terrible events, the Kurdish problem has not been transformed into a Turkish problem. The mere hint of peace scares those who oppose peace, though it brings joy to the families who have lost their sons in battle. This is why they fully support the government's talks with PKK leader Abdullah Öcalan.

We know that this is the same case on the Kurdish side. Kurdish families who have lived through great pain also do not wish to see this war continue. They have paid a price and this is a price they are prepared to sacrifice in the name of peace. At the same time, some Kurds are under heavy pressure from some factions that have never paid such a price to remain silent. Just as there are those who speak in the name of Turkish families who have lost their sons to warfare, it is also true that in Kurdish areas, there are those who speak in the names of the thousands of mothers and fathers who are in pain over the loss of their sons. There are those who carry out politics over the dead bodies of these sons. The very same people who have experienced the pain and tragedy of war are the ones who desire peace in the very marrow of their bones.

The Hizmet movement also wants peace. And peace is of course desired by the movement's leader, Fethullah Gülen, who has worked for so many years to see the brotherhood between Turks and Kurds improved. Words of sincerity and courage spoken by Gülen should stand as examples for the leaders of our political parties and everyone needs to think once more about the meaning contained in his message of belief, courage, peace and brotherhood. As Gülen notes, if there is to be peace, those who drank poison ought to be able to say that they drank sweetened fruit juice instead.

If you are at all intent on seeing peace, how better to describe your intent that the above words? I believe that those who agree with this description are those who want peace and those who will be pushing for peace. Let us all join together in hoping that the numbers and strength of those who want peace will increase.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
Disappointment in Hrant Dink case
16 May 2013
Son of al-Assad following in footsteps of father
12 May 2013
A life like everyone else has
9 May 2013
New era, new politics
3 May 2013
The Ottomans, the state system and today's reality
2 May 2013
A noteworthy hearing in Diyarbakır
26 April 2013
The PKK is withdrawing; neo-nationalists are gathering under a national umbrella
25 April 2013
Do Kurdish civil politicians think differently than those in Kandil?
19 April 2013
International actors and the peace process
18 April 2013
Is the CHP splitting?
12 April 2013
What did you give the PKK?
11 April 2013
Questions not asked to Umberto Eco
5 April 2013
It was politics that opened the way
4 April 2013
At home and in the world: wise people
29 March 2013
Hizmet movement to address Armenian issue
22 March 2013
Will the PKK bury its arms?
21 March 2013
Past crimes and prosecutor's opinion at Ergenekon trial
15 March 2013
Syriacs in Turkey and their rights
14 March 2013
Syriacs in Sweden
8 March 2013
Is the BDP the CHP of the Kurds?
7 March 2013
Does Öcalan have a vision for the future?
1 March 2013
Who leaked the minutes from the meeting with Öcalan?
28 February 2013
Feb. 28, Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and discrediting
22 February 2013
Paradigms of nationalism and prime minister's three speeches
15 February 2013
Will the peace talks fail?
14 February 2013
News from the PKK
8 February 2013
Don't say ‘You have a chance to become a Turk'; no one would believe you
7 February 2013
Dear Turks, your way is wrong
1 February 2013
Assad's Kurdish policy
31 January 2013
Isolation of the Syrian people
25 January 2013
A standard case of racism
24 January 2013
Right to court defense in one's mother tongue
18 January 2013
Following Mehmet Ali Birand
17 January 2013
Role of leaders in solution processes
11 January 2013
Peace-haters
10 January 2013
Who wants peace?
4 January 2013
What are the challenges of the new negotiations?
3 January 2013
The past and present of the Kurdish question
28 December 2012
Accounting for what occurred in Uludere
27 December 2012
In memory of Şerafettin Elçi
21 December 2012
Empathy
20 December 2012
Will rebellion be born of brutality and repression?
14 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (2)
13 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (1)
7 December 2012
Indecisive Maliki v. decisive Barzani
6 December 2012
In the eyes of a mother
30 November 2012
New status for Palestine
29 November 2012
Immunities
23 November 2012
Is there a crack in the CHP?
22 November 2012
While Sept. 12 is on trial
16 November 2012
Leyla Zana and Feleknas Uca
15 November 2012
A new era with Obama
9 November 2012
Feb. 28 and collective memory
8 November 2012
Unsettling witness in Ergenekon case
2 November 2012
The republic and peace
1 November 2012
Hunger strikes: 30 years ago, 30 years after
19 October 2012
When the EU fears its future
18 October 2012
The EU and the Nobel Peace Prize
12 October 2012
The Öcalan proposal and Feb. 28’s unfinished business
11 October 2012
Confronting Feb. 28
7 October 2012
Heading towards 2071: Turks and Kurds
4 October 2012
Assad’s new move
28 September 2012
Optional lessons
27 September 2012
Balyoz case
21 September 2012
CHP and Oslo process
20 September 2012
Bingöl: 20 years ago, 20 years later
14 September 2012
Common future
13 September 2012
Turks and Kurds
7 September 2012
‘Time for Justice'
6 September 2012
A ‘wise men’ formula and Turkey
2 September 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (3)
31 August 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (2)
30 August 2012
Psycholoical warfare and Kurdish issue (1)
24 August 2012
Sheikh Fethullah and Arameans
23 August 2012
The PKK
17 August 2012
The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil
16 August 2012
‘Dersim is surrounded by four mountains’
10 August 2012
An untimely debate
9 August 2012
What do Kurds want?
3 August 2012
Davutoğlu’s visit to Arbil
2 August 2012
Whistling a Kurdish tune
27 July 2012
Is the real problem peshmergas sent from Arbil to Syria?
26 July 2012
Writers and readers
20 July 2012
Karayılan’s reply to call for cease-fire
19 July 2012
The powers that be
13 July 2012
Settling accounts with the past and political will
12 July 2012
Settling accounts with coups and the 3rd judicial package
6 July 2012
Does prime minister hold Moses’ staff?
5 July 2012
If the prime minister wills
28 June 2012
Nationalist envisagement and the Nationalist Movement Party
21 June 2012
Turkish nationalists and change
14 June 2012
Special courts
7 June 2012
CHP’s ‘Kurdish initiative’
31 May 2012
The matter of interlocutorship
24 May 2012
‘Strategic vision’
17 May 2012
İstanbul-Arbil alliance
10 May 2012
About Dersim while Dersim archives are being opened
3 May 2012
Memory, wars and past time
26 April 2012
Ah, that symmetry!
...