Lack of proper opposition
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 24 December 2012, Monday 0 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

Lack of proper opposition

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has once again made some controversial remarks which were a topic of hot debate among columnists and politicians for a week.

He complained that the separation of powers holds the government back in its efforts to better service the country. Though he has been highly criticized for his remarks, accused of working to become a “one man power,” members of Erdoğan’s government have said the prime minister’s remarks were misunderstood and that he is unhappy with the malfunctioning of the separation of powers.

Sabah’s Hasan Bülent Kahraman says Turkey has already discussed the principle of separation of powers several times in the past and that we have seen it doesn’t solve anything. However, as for Erdoğan making such a complaint about the principle of separation of powers, Kahraman argues that what is really happening is merely the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) being its own opposition. The AK Party faces a problem of the lack of a proper opposition party. The Republican People’s Party (CHP) would be a better functioning opposition party if it were a more leftist party. And the country’s Kurds could be a better opposition group and an opportunity for our democracy to improve, but the Kurdish segment of society is squandering this opportunity. Under these circumstances, the AK Party has to function as its own opposition and express its criticism about the political system, Kahraman asserts. And the remark by Erdoğan was “the voice of the opposition spirit within the ruling party,” he further says.

Mustafa Karaalioğlu from the Star daily also thinks that Erdoğan wishes that there was a powerful opposition party that would raise the bar of change and democracy in the country. And the prime minister often expresses this wish. Then why is it always the AK Party or Erdoğan who constantly delivers such controversial remarks that dominate the political agenda, and why do opposition parties like the CHP or opposing media outlets never try to dominate the agenda with other topics? Karaalioğlu explains that it is because change is the basic dynamic of producing agenda-setting matters and because both the media and the opposition parties are so afraid of any change that they never try to make any big move that will dominate the political agenda.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
3 June 2013
Gezi Park reactions
31 May 2013
Controversy over bridge's name
30 May 2013
Third bridge over Bosporus
29 May 2013
Worries about the alcohol ban
28 May 2013
Realpolitik in Syria
27 May 2013
May 27, Turkey's first coup
27 May 2013
Realpolitik in Syria
26 May 2013
Contentious ban on alcohol
24 May 2013
Game-changer for Syria
23 May 2013
Syrian puzzle
22 May 2013
AK Party’s Plans B and C for constitution
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
...
Bloggers