Kurdistan oil: a strategic shift
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
25 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 14 December 2012, Friday 5 0 0 0
SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL
s.gursel@todayszaman.com

Kurdistan oil: a strategic shift

The oil and natural gas fields of northern Iraq controlled by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) could be the next battlefield of the Middle East.

Even if that does not turn out to be the case, and I think a military clash is not very likely, these fields will definitely be the main factor reshaping the strategic relations of Turkey with the Middle East. I came to northern Iraq last week for a three-day visit upon an invitation from Arbil's Işık University to join a conference on the Turkish economy. With my colleagues from Zaman, we had the opportunity to hold very informative meetings with a number of eminent personalities from the KRG, including Sinan Çelebi, the minister of trade and industry, and Sefin Dizai, a government spokesman.

Arbil gives the impression of being a city with a dual nature: Skyscrapers, luxury hotels and wealthy malls form the Arbil arising from oil revenue, while the old bazaar, with its poor shops and dilapidated houses, is the traditional Arbil that received a flow of Kurdish villagers from the 4,500 villages that were destroyed during the war. Oil production is limited to 300,000 barrel per day for the moment; two-thirds of this is exported to Turkey by truck. Minister Çelebi told me that potential production is estimated to be 1 million barrels per day. Iraq possesses the largest oil reserves in the world, and a sizeable amount of them are in Kurdistan. Energy experts estimate that the Kirkuk region alone has 7 percent of the world oil reserves. It is therefore not very difficult to understand why Kirkuk is so disputed between Arbil and Baghdad. Mr. Çelebi told me that natural gas reserves, not yet exploited, can satisfy the consumption of Turkey (over 40 billion cubic meters per year) for 300 years to come and

that he considers northern Iraq a natural part of Anatolia.

All this energy wealth has to be exported through pipelines across Turkey, which has a common frontier with the KRG. According to The Washington Post (Dec. 11), Turkey is negotiating “a massive deal in which a new Turkish company, backed by the government, is proposing to drill for oil … and build pipelines.” The KRG recently signed contracts with energy giants such as ExxonMobil, Gazprom and others. The KRG officials we met in Arbil asserted that the strategic rapprochement with Turkey is the only way to secure the KRG's autonomy and welfare. A high-ranking Turkish official told us that “if Turkey loses this opportunity, it will go down in history.”

Indeed, Turkey, which had only a few years ago considered the Kurdish autonomous region in Iraq a major threat to its unity, now sees it as a strategic partner, and with good reason. Iraq this year became Turkey's top trade partner, taking over the spot from Germany. Turkish exports are expected to reach $12 billon in 2012. I had been curious about the share of Kurdistan in these exports for some time now, as there are no separate statistics. I posed this question to Trade and Industry Minister Çelebi. According to him, more than 90 percent of the KRG's imports come from Turkey, and probably 20-30 percent of the Turkish goods are then resold in southern Iraq.

The northern Iraqi market obviously presents huge potential for Turkey, eager to increase its exports in order to sustain its high external deficit and to fuel its economic growth. Minister Çelebi said that, six to seven years ago, the KRG budget has been limited to $150 million, import duties being the sole source. Nowadays, budget revenues have reached $10-12 billion. Per capita income, which was about $300, has now reached somewhere between $4,000-5,000. If all the oil and gas deals are carried to fruition and the black gold starts to flow freely through the pipelines, these figures will easily multiply threefold over the next couple of years.

The Turkish-Kurdish courtship is of course not welcomed by everyone. First of all, the principal protagonist, Baghdad, is furious about this strategic rapprochement. Baghdad knows that if the north of the country is economically integrated into the Turkish economy, the way to an independent Kurdistan will be wide open. Iran also worries about the intensifying links between Turks and Kurds. But it can still include Shiite southern Iraq in its zone of influence. Washington is also worried about the Turkish-Kurdish courtship. Victoria Nuland, the US Department of State spokeswoman, declared two days ago that the US strongly opposes any Turkey-KRG oil deal as long as there is no green light from Baghdad.

These reactions are quite understandable. What is remarkable is the strategic shift exhibited by Turkey regarding the KRG. A quasi-independent Kurdish state bordering Turkey's Kurdish region is no longer considered a threat but as a historic opportunity. If Turkey can find a political solution to its Kurdish problem, I believe a new era will begin in the Middle East.

COMMENTS
"Mr. Çelebi told me that natural gas reserves can satisfy the consumption of Turkey for 300 years and that he considers northern Iraq a natural part of Anatolia" Some don't seem to draw lessons from the "Committee of Union
Othman
"Çelebi told me that he considers northern Iraq a natural part of Anatolia" You don't seem have learnt the lesson of Committee of Unity and Progress whose attitude lost her the confidence of the Arabs and consequently ruined the Ottoman State.
Omar
Iraqi kurdish tribes, similar to Armenian tribes, are promoting a fanatic expansionist nationalism that distorts history while making territorial claims on Turkey. If AKP establishes relations with these fanatic groups or continues to engage in policies that legitimize extremism, it cannot be call...
Aysun Alabora
As long as PKK terrorism exists and makes territorial claims on Turkey, it will be impossible to allow the creation of a Kurdistan in northern Iraq. That is why it is in Iraqi Kurds best interests to quickly remove PKK terrorism from Iraq and stop trying to assist foreign efforts to manufacture a s...
Evgin
Turkey cannot afford to legitimize a so-called "kurdistan" in Iraq. Doing so means putting national security in danger. Never in history has there existed a so-called "kurdistan" in Iraq or anywhere else in the world. International law and the 1926 Ankara Treaty also forbid it.
Deniz
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
24 May 2013
What strategy could be better for the AK Party?
20 May 2013
A European socialist view of the CHP
17 May 2013
Employment increases despite low growth
13 May 2013
Working women and the headscarf
10 May 2013
Interesting questions on Turkish economy
6 May 2013
‘Eurozone is on the brink of collapse'
3 May 2013
Amalgams should be avoided
29 April 2013
Structural features of unemployment
26 April 2013
Peace process going well but not the economy
22 April 2013
Material deprivation among children
19 April 2013
Limits of monetary policy
15 April 2013
The gas of the east Mediterranean
12 April 2013
A modest revival in sight
8 April 2013
Working children
5 April 2013
Central bank facing trade-offs
1 April 2013
Hard landing is confirmed
29 March 2013
A surprising upgrade
25 March 2013
An outcome fraught with consequences
22 March 2013
Peace dividends
18 March 2013
Are the brakes burning?
15 March 2013
Unemployment is still on a rising trend
11 March 2013
Something is being plotted over Cyprus
8 March 2013
Huge regional disparities in unemployment
4 March 2013
Is education a panacea?
1 March 2013
Productivity or employment
25 February 2013
Neither working nor studying
22 February 2013
‘Women hold up half the sky' -- Mao Zedong
18 February 2013
Female employment, as well as unemployment, greatly increased
15 February 2013
More children will not solve aging population problem
11 February 2013
Worries on economic growth
8 February 2013
Once again on the presidential debate
4 February 2013
Fears of ageing population
1 February 2013
The ideal but difficult mix for the Turkish economy
28 January 2013
Uncertainty regarding EU membership is increasing
25 January 2013
‘Informality' in the Turkish labor market
21 January 2013
Bid for regional power could be realized through peace
18 January 2013
Too little growth, too much employment
14 January 2013
Undesirable tradeoff
11 January 2013
Erdem Başçı, central banker of the year
7 January 2013
How bad is it going in Europe?
4 January 2013
Pro-coup mindset waiting for AK Party's failure in economics
31 December 2012
Two scenarios for the Turkish economy in 2013
28 December 2012
The year of rebalancing
24 December 2012
‘Confusing' policies of the Turkish Central Bank
21 December 2012
Turkish schools abroad: a global phenomenon
17 December 2012
Unemployment up as expected
14 December 2012
Kurdistan oil: a strategic shift
11 December 2012
Growth: Lower than expected
6 December 2012
Debt crisis as seen from Greece
3 December 2012
OECD is rather optimistic on the Turkish economy
30 November 2012
Greece's ‘dark period' not over yet
26 November 2012
European turmoil's and the Turkish accession
22 November 2012
Why can't credit rating agencies agree?
19 November 2012
Too much focus on presidential election is dangerous
16 November 2012
Two bad, one good news item
12 November 2012
Income inequality in Turkey
9 November 2012
Upgrading Turkey
5 November 2012
Depreciation is hardly a tool for competitiveness
1 November 2012
AK Party decade from a historical perspective
29 October 2012
World Savings Day
24 October 2012
Reshaping EU presents new opportunity for Turkey
22 October 2012
Housing prices in Turkey
18 October 2012
Unemployment can be headache for government
15 October 2012
Turkey-EU relations need new perspective
11 October 2012
Is the new roadmap credible?
8 October 2012
The risk Syria poses to the Turkish economy
4 October 2012
AK Party's 2023 vision
1 October 2012
Not much room to maneuver
27 September 2012
Electoral system reform
24 September 2012
Looking for the right policy mıx
16 September 2012
Poverty in Turkey
10 September 2012
Second quarter confirms worries about low growth
3 September 2012
BRICS a challenge to the supremacy of the West
27 August 2012
Turkish bourgeoisie according to Orhan Pamuk
12 August 2012
Severance pay reform
5 August 2012
Demographic dynamics, aging populations and Turkey
31 July 2012
Republican People's Party has no economic strategy
22 July 2012
Long term growth perspectives for Turkey
15 July 2012
Austerity policies in jeopardy
8 July 2012
The unpleasant low growth perspective
1 July 2012
Dangers on Turkey's road to becoming a real regional power
24 June 2012
The European deadlock
17 June 2012
Babacan is decided on fiscal discipline
10 June 2012
A revolutionary program for Greece
3 June 2012
Sluggish growth and AK Party rule
27 May 2012
Pro-poor economic growth and the AK Party
20 May 2012
What should we do with a president elected by a general vote?
13 May 2012
Open letter to French President Hollande
6 May 2012
Is Standard & Poor's so wrong?
29 April 2012
On employment and labor market reforms
22 April 2012
Economic background of military coups
15 April 2012
Signs of a slowdown
8 April 2012
Investment incentives arrived at right moment
1 April 2012
Fiscal devaluation for Turkey
25 March 2012
Fiscal devaluation instead of an exit from euro
18 March 2012
The worrying savings gap
11 March 2012
Women: Too few are working, too much violence against them
4 March 2012
Sisyphus and the Danaids
26 February 2012
A masked debate on education
19 February 2012
Exports will be the key for a soft landing
...