Prime minister’s anesthetic effect
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 13 December 2012, Thursday 0 0 0 0
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
e.mahcupyan@todayszaman

Prime minister’s anesthetic effect

Currently, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is trying to deliver two messages: that he controls politics and that he is responsible for protecting the moral sensitivity of the people.

Some would argue that this is necessary and that the prime minister is taking measures in an effort to address potential tensions in his party. On the other hand, these messages could be attributed to the prime minister’s self-confidence and strong emphasis upon his personality. But it is visible that the most important effect of this strategy upon Turkish politics can be seen in the opposition, which has been interestingly paralyzed by this. The Republican Peoples’ Party (CHP) and the secular media were tempted by the erosion of Erdoğan’s image. In the end, they paid attention to what the prime minister said instead of what the government did. A popular discourse and style of opposition focusing on Erdoğan has been enthusiastically promoted.

This approach led to discussion of a number of important issues, including the Office of the Ombudsman, with clichéd arguments to undermine the image of the government. It was already evident and obvious that the person picked as ombudsman was not a man of integrity and did not have the competence to become the first ombudsman in Turkey. However, everybody waited for his appointment and then remembered that this person undersigned as judge of the Court of Appeals the judgment by which Hrant Dink was convicted. However, it was not hard for the CHP to initiate a social campaign to elect a different person. It was realistic for the government to pick somebody who would not become a burden to avoid any troubles in relations with the EU.

However, the main opposition party and the secular media did not take this path. They preferred a different style of opposition by which they hoped for the emergence of a state of affairs where it would be fine to criticize the Justice and Development Party (AK Party), and the government would be undermined. However, the result of this would not be a change in the Office of the Ombudsman. Days will pass, and Turkey will acknowledge this preference. In this way, the sphere of politics has been left in the control of the government for the sake of desire for justified criticisms, whereas the opposition will remain as a complainant bystander.

It appears that the prime minister is aware of this approach of the opposition. For this reason, he offers something that they could be occupied with through the entire week and replaces the popular identity discussions with politics. The reference to a soap opera, which allegedly distorts history, after discussions on abortion and the death penalty, will not lead to any result. The motion referred to Parliament by an AK Party deputy asking for the production of soap operas that respect history will remain a humorous item. The prime minister, on the other hand, will raise another discussion when this issue is no longer appealing.

The current state of affairs suggests that the prime minister is a lightning rod for the entire political opposition. Perhaps this is the period where the ministers feel most comfortable doing their jobs because nobody is going after the ministries’ decisions and actions. The opposition is entirely focused on Erdoğan, and the media acts as if it would not perform its job unless it raises regular daily criticism. It is obvious that Erdoğan has an anesthetic effect upon secular circles. He is aware of this, and for this reason, he makes periodic interventions to keep this effect alive.

The opposition needs to see that none of the provocative discourses and statements of Erdoğan have become a political decision, and they will not. The statements themselves perform the desired political function anyway. They address the concerns of some people and show who represents the average moral sensitivity. Being trapped by Erdoğan’s plot satisfies the feeling of superiority of some people within secular circles; and in this way, Erdoğan’s ability to represent the people becomes stronger and more visible.

The secular opposition should stop acting like a complainant and arrogant bystander. It is an indication of a lack of wisdom to think that wasting time with rumors and gossip is politics at a time when Turkey is going through a process of reconstruction.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
9 May 2013
Of what use are ‘wise people'?
2 May 2013
What should the Armenians not do?
25 April 2013
Peace is easy, but settlement will take time
18 April 2013
State of second-hand smoking
11 April 2013
A good panel in Washington
4 April 2013
Paradox of democracy
28 March 2013
CHP no longer normal
20 March 2013
When peace becomes rational
14 March 2013
The secularists who are disturbed by peace
7 March 2013
Opportunities the West missed
28 February 2013
Educated ignorance
21 February 2013
Political veracity or political folly
14 February 2013
Dani Rodrik for the last time
7 February 2013
The Sledgehammer facts
31 January 2013
Dani Rodrik's facts
24 January 2013
Who conspired against Dani Rodrik?
17 January 2013
Maturation
10 January 2013
AKP peace via Öcalan
3 January 2013
What will happen to the new constitution?
27 December 2012
Ergenekon’s recent tactics
20 December 2012
With such a shabby opposition...
13 December 2012
Prime minister’s anesthetic effect
6 December 2012
A cliché from Europe
29 November 2012
The foundation for a solution
22 November 2012
PKK’s path and PM’s language
15 November 2012
Why is pro- Kurdish politics tainted with urgency?
8 November 2012
Place of EU in AK Party universe
1 November 2012
Is the CPJ Report fair?
24 October 2012
Structural prejudice
18 October 2012
The ‘harakiri’ era in the West
11 October 2012
Will Erdoğan and Gül really clash?
4 October 2012
Manipulation campaign and Balyoz
27 September 2012
What does the freedom of expression protect?
23 September 2012
Freedom of expression and coexistence
13 September 2012
Limit of soft power
6 September 2012
The Kurdish people face forced normalization
30 August 2012
Political insensitivities all around
23 August 2012
PKK detaches from reality
16 August 2012
Some paradoxes
9 August 2012
Is Gül an alternative?
2 August 2012
Why is the prime minister being provocative?
26 July 2012
The era of soft neo-nationalism at the CHP
19 July 2012
Realpolitik in the Kurdish issue
12 July 2012
Religious Affairs Directorate on brink of illegitimacy
5 July 2012
Last chance, but for who?
28 June 2012
Limits of soft power
21 June 2012
The AKP’s new republic
14 June 2012
A new center?
7 June 2012
Reunion of values
31 May 2012
Ode to inconsistency
24 May 2012
Anatomy of a deadlock
17 May 2012
Towards a semi-presidential system?
10 May 2012
The way out for the new constitution
3 May 2012
A headscarved woman at the April 24 commemoration
26 April 2012
Responsibility towards history
19 April 2012
A final blow to tutelage
12 April 2012
From ‘Bayrak’ to ‘Balyoz’: Society finally calls spade a spade
5 April 2012
Loophole in EP report
29 March 2012
A few days in Brussels
22 March 2012
Why did the Kurdish issue evolve into a deadlock?
15 March 2012
Does the AKP want a new constitution?
8 March 2012
Did AKP become pro-status quo?
1 March 2012
An opportunity for the AKP to become a ‘master’
23 February 2012
An instructive crisis
17 February 2012
A transitional period fight (2)
16 February 2012
A transitional period fight (1)
9 February 2012
Why does the AKP still attract support?
2 February 2012
Hrant’s parasites
26 January 2012
The Uludere massacre as a political move
19 January 2012
The jester is naked
12 January 2012
Illegal acts are no longer normal
5 January 2012
A coup against the government from within
29 December 2011
The French bill and Armenians
22 December 2011
There will not be a recession in Turkey
15 December 2011
Why are the reforms stalled?
8 December 2011
The constitution of ‘new Muslims’
1 December 2011
The meaning of the Dersim apology
24 November 2011
AKP takes over the republic
17 November 2011
Turning points for Turkey’s religious people
10 November 2011
KCK operation and democracy’s nuances
3 November 2011
Humanity and racism in the aftermath of an earthquake
27 October 2011
Strategic suicide
20 October 2011
The Kurds’ Arab Spring
13 October 2011
Kurdish issue and social grounds
6 October 2011
How has Turkey become a global actor?
29 September 2011
Dissociation in the Kurdish issue
22 September 2011
Erdoğan’s secular opening
15 September 2011
Neo-Ottomanism
8 September 2011
‘Native aliens’ become citizens
1 September 2011
End of the story
25 August 2011
Breivik as a reflex
18 August 2011
The media's passive Breiviks
11 August 2011
The 'pluralist' scenario of the modernist delusion
4 August 2011
Resignation of the top military commanders
28 July 2011
Breivik's empathy
21 July 2011
PKK’s dilemma
14 July 2011
Turkey from a Western perspective
7 July 2011
Boycott policies
30 June 2011
A policy of crisis
23 June 2011
Dangerous reformer
...