Greece's ‘dark period' not over yet
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 30 November 2012, Friday 1 0 0 0
SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL
s.gursel@todayszaman.com

Greece's ‘dark period' not over yet

The third agreement between the Troika (European Commission-European Central Bank-International Monetary Fund [IMF]) and Greece was signed this week. The first one goes back to 2010, and the second one to a year ago. Both of them failed. Will the third work? As soon as the agreement was signed, Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras declared that the “dark period for Greece is over.” Unfortunately, I am not as optimistic as Mr. Samaras, and I think that the “dark period” for Greeks will continue for a long time.

When the second agreement was signed, I wrote for this column an article titled “Sisyphus and the Danaids” (March 4, 2012) in which I compared the Greeks to King Sisyphus and the Danaids to the Europeans. Sisyphus was punished by Zeus -- for many crimes -- to roll an immense boulder up a hill. Every time he was about to reach the top, however, the massive stone would roll back down, forcing him to begin again. The Danaids were the daughters of King Danaus, who were also condemned by Zeus -- for killing their husbands -- and sentenced to fill a leaky barrel for eternity. The punishments for Sisyphus and the Danaids are well known metaphors for useless efforts and unending frustration.

So, what has changed with the third agreement? Except for some details regarding the time spent for the planned stabilization and a limited debt structuring, almost nothing regarding the fundamentals of the problem. The Troika decided to disburse 44 billion euros in December, and the remaining amounts -- up to 100 billion euros -- will be disbursed under strict conditions. Greece committed to implementing radical tax reform in January, to firing thousands of additional public employees, privatizing public companies worth 50 billion euros and making its economy more market friendly. For its part, the Troika will lower the interest rates on official loans by 100 basic points (bps), postpone interest payment for 10 years as well as fiscal targets from 2014 to 2016, and asked Greece to buy back a limited part of its undervalued debt from the market.

Finally, it has given Greece much more time to stabilize its debt, which will reach two times its gross domestic product (GDP) by 2016, and only then start to decrease if the country can produce a budget surplus after interest payments of 4.5 percent of GDP and, above all, to realize sizable growth in the next decade. If all these targets are reached, its debt ratio will be back to 120 percent in 2020! I am not the only economist who thinks this is a Sisyphean task. Daniel Hanson wrote in The Wall Street Journal (Nov. 22) that “Greece's only option is default” given the state of Greek society.

Let me quote Hanson's description: “No stable consumer base exists to drive consumption demand, exports have fallen sharply and investment growth has been negative for more than five years. Investors would be foolish to bet on earning returns from Greece any time in the near future.” Let me add that recent statistics point out that this year only 20,000 homes have been constructed, while this number was 100,000 in 2007. Hanson notes that, according to the Greek Ministry of Health, the suicide rate was 40 percent higher in 2011 than in 2010, while the unemployment rate reached 25 percent, youth unemployment stands at 50 percent, and they are on an increasing path. Hanson believes (and I agree with him) that “stable governance and peaceful elections are not guaranteed, and so long as social conditions continue to deteriorate, political protests will grow larger and more violent. Recent polls claim that the electoral support for the neo-Nazi party climbed from 7 percent to 12 percent, while support for the leftist partners of the coalition government continues to vanish.”

From the beginning of the Greek debt crisis, I argued that there is no solution to the crisis but the exit of Greece from the eurozone in order to restore competitiveness and pave the way for growth through high devaluation while imposing severe fiscal discipline. As part of this option, large debt relief should be considered as the price to pay for mitigating the Greek threat to the eurozone. Recently, the IMF defended the second part of this option, a radical “hair cut,” in official Greek debt to make it sustainable. But the Germans refused, being afraid of the reaction of their taxpayers. I spent a few days this week in Berlin. Some influential German journalists I met with there were unanimous: Chancellor Angela Merkel cannot consider this option till the next elections, to be held in September 2013.

However, Moody's Investors Service said on Thursday that even with the agreed upon measures, “Greece's debt load remains unsustainable and the chance of a default high.” Admittedly, the Danaids will be continuing to try to fill up the leaky barrel.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
20 May 2013
A European socialist view of the CHP
17 May 2013
Employment increases despite low growth
13 May 2013
Working women and the headscarf
10 May 2013
Interesting questions on Turkish economy
6 May 2013
‘Eurozone is on the brink of collapse'
3 May 2013
Amalgams should be avoided
29 April 2013
Structural features of unemployment
26 April 2013
Peace process going well but not the economy
22 April 2013
Material deprivation among children
19 April 2013
Limits of monetary policy
15 April 2013
The gas of the east Mediterranean
12 April 2013
A modest revival in sight
8 April 2013
Working children
5 April 2013
Central bank facing trade-offs
1 April 2013
Hard landing is confirmed
29 March 2013
A surprising upgrade
25 March 2013
An outcome fraught with consequences
22 March 2013
Peace dividends
18 March 2013
Are the brakes burning?
15 March 2013
Unemployment is still on a rising trend
11 March 2013
Something is being plotted over Cyprus
8 March 2013
Huge regional disparities in unemployment
4 March 2013
Is education a panacea?
1 March 2013
Productivity or employment
25 February 2013
Neither working nor studying
22 February 2013
‘Women hold up half the sky' -- Mao Zedong
18 February 2013
Female employment, as well as unemployment, greatly increased
15 February 2013
More children will not solve aging population problem
11 February 2013
Worries on economic growth
8 February 2013
Once again on the presidential debate
4 February 2013
Fears of ageing population
1 February 2013
The ideal but difficult mix for the Turkish economy
28 January 2013
Uncertainty regarding EU membership is increasing
25 January 2013
‘Informality' in the Turkish labor market
21 January 2013
Bid for regional power could be realized through peace
18 January 2013
Too little growth, too much employment
14 January 2013
Undesirable tradeoff
11 January 2013
Erdem Başçı, central banker of the year
7 January 2013
How bad is it going in Europe?
4 January 2013
Pro-coup mindset waiting for AK Party's failure in economics
31 December 2012
Two scenarios for the Turkish economy in 2013
28 December 2012
The year of rebalancing
24 December 2012
‘Confusing' policies of the Turkish Central Bank
21 December 2012
Turkish schools abroad: a global phenomenon
17 December 2012
Unemployment up as expected
14 December 2012
Kurdistan oil: a strategic shift
11 December 2012
Growth: Lower than expected
6 December 2012
Debt crisis as seen from Greece
3 December 2012
OECD is rather optimistic on the Turkish economy
30 November 2012
Greece's ‘dark period' not over yet
26 November 2012
European turmoil's and the Turkish accession
22 November 2012
Why can't credit rating agencies agree?
19 November 2012
Too much focus on presidential election is dangerous
16 November 2012
Two bad, one good news item
12 November 2012
Income inequality in Turkey
9 November 2012
Upgrading Turkey
5 November 2012
Depreciation is hardly a tool for competitiveness
1 November 2012
AK Party decade from a historical perspective
29 October 2012
World Savings Day
24 October 2012
Reshaping EU presents new opportunity for Turkey
22 October 2012
Housing prices in Turkey
18 October 2012
Unemployment can be headache for government
15 October 2012
Turkey-EU relations need new perspective
11 October 2012
Is the new roadmap credible?
8 October 2012
The risk Syria poses to the Turkish economy
4 October 2012
AK Party's 2023 vision
1 October 2012
Not much room to maneuver
27 September 2012
Electoral system reform
24 September 2012
Looking for the right policy mıx
16 September 2012
Poverty in Turkey
10 September 2012
Second quarter confirms worries about low growth
3 September 2012
BRICS a challenge to the supremacy of the West
27 August 2012
Turkish bourgeoisie according to Orhan Pamuk
12 August 2012
Severance pay reform
5 August 2012
Demographic dynamics, aging populations and Turkey
31 July 2012
Republican People's Party has no economic strategy
22 July 2012
Long term growth perspectives for Turkey
15 July 2012
Austerity policies in jeopardy
8 July 2012
The unpleasant low growth perspective
1 July 2012
Dangers on Turkey's road to becoming a real regional power
24 June 2012
The European deadlock
17 June 2012
Babacan is decided on fiscal discipline
10 June 2012
A revolutionary program for Greece
3 June 2012
Sluggish growth and AK Party rule
27 May 2012
Pro-poor economic growth and the AK Party
20 May 2012
What should we do with a president elected by a general vote?
13 May 2012
Open letter to French President Hollande
6 May 2012
Is Standard & Poor's so wrong?
29 April 2012
On employment and labor market reforms
22 April 2012
Economic background of military coups
15 April 2012
Signs of a slowdown
8 April 2012
Investment incentives arrived at right moment
1 April 2012
Fiscal devaluation for Turkey
25 March 2012
Fiscal devaluation instead of an exit from euro
18 March 2012
The worrying savings gap
11 March 2012
Women: Too few are working, too much violence against them
4 March 2012
Sisyphus and the Danaids
26 February 2012
A masked debate on education
19 February 2012
Exports will be the key for a soft landing
...