‘Terrorist witness’
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 09 November 2012, Friday 0 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

‘Terrorist witness’

A secret witness in the case against the Ergenekon terrorist organization has recently disclosed his real identity as Şemdin Sakık, a former commander of the terrorist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), and gave statements to the court about the shadowy relations between the PKK and Ergenekon.

Some have great concerns about the court hearing the testimony of a former terrorist in one of Turkey’s most crucial cases while others argue that because he had an important role in the organization, he is an even better choice for a witness.

Bugün’s Gülay Göktürk says it is almost impossible not to react over Sakık being a witness in the Ergenekon case, considering the lies he previously made about a number of journalists and how he acted under the command of Ergenekon plotters. It is impossible to believe or guarantee that such a dangerous man with such a dark past won’t manipulate the judiciary.

All of these are reasonable concerns. But from another side of the issue, who else can prosecutors speak with to better learn about the shady ties between Ergenekon and the PKK? Similarly, if PKK chiefs Murat Karayılan and Bahoz Erdal are caught, won’t we make them talk or question them about the structure and plans of the organization? What matters here is whether we trust the members of the court or not.

The truth is, while the judiciary or the police force tries to make use of “shady people,” trying to get information from them, these same people also try to use the police or the judiciary to either save themselves or to advance some larger plot. What is of utmost significance here is not the credibility of the witness but the intentions, authority and intelligence of those listening to the witness who should realize the difference between the truth and lies, she says.

Sabah’s Mahmut Övür focuses on Sakık’s testimony in which he spoke about the murder of 33 unarmed off-duty soldiers in Bingöl in 1993, saying it occurred because of the state’s negligence. Övür thinks it is “unbelievable” that Sakık called a series of unsolved murders in 1993 a “secret coup” and said that the murder of the soldiers was a result of the state’s negligence. Sakık is not telling the truth and remains silent about the crucial information that he has. Övür also thinks Sakık might be sending a secret message to some people with his testimony.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
25 January 2013
The CHP in contradiction with its leftist image
24 January 2013
Shadow cast over peace plans
23 January 2013
Paris killings get even more complicated
22 January 2013
Not Kurdish problem, democracy problem
21 January 2013
Good signs
20 January 2013
Turkey's struggle against its phobias
18 January 2013
First test on the long road to peace
17 January 2013
Six answers to ‘Why now'
16 January 2013
Language needed for peace
15 January 2013
Syria's possible role in the Paris killings
14 January 2013
Scenarios over the Paris slayings
...