‘Odd’ Israeli call
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 23 October 2012, Tuesday 6 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

‘Odd’ Israeli call

Despite the strained ties between Israel and Turkey over Israel’s 2010 attack on the Mavi Marmara aid ship in which it killed nine people, former Israeli Ambassador to Turkey Pinhas Avivi recently offered, through the media, to sit down with Ankara at the negotiation table without preconditions and to discuss the Syrian crisis.

But Ankara dismissed the possibility, a response that columnists all support, saying that Israel should first fulfill the Turkish criteria for the normalization of ties.

Fikret Bila, a Milliyet columnist, says Israel’s raid of the aid ship in international waters undoubtedly constituted an act of piracy. And after such an act against the law, Israel did not accept fault in any way, nor give a positive response to Ankara’s demands for an official apology, compensation for the families of the Mavi Marmara victims and the lifting of the Israeli blockade on Gaza. Moreover, it continued with its threats. Looking at this picture, Israel is the one dynamiting Turkish-Israeli relations.

In this sense, Avivi’s call could have been seen as a positive step, if the content and method of delivery had been different. The call has been considered rather odd, first because it was made through the media rather than as a direct communication with Ankara. Second, it is odd that such a call came given the state of the Syrian crisis. Third, Avivi’s demand that the two countries should come together “without preconditions” means that Israel wants to continue to ignore all the conditions Turkey once set out, and that it wants Turkey to acknowledge Israel’s illegal act. The first two oddities are already suspicious, but the third renders the call an impossible one to accept, Bila says. If Israel really wants its relations with Turkey to normalize, it should start with an apology. Otherwise, any call for normalization will be nothing more than clutching at straws.

The Star’s Fehmi Koru says, first of all, that deteriorating relations between the two countries are not the fault of the two parties. Turkey has never adopted an attitude other than friendship towards Israel and, more importantly, Turkey’s reaction against Israel does not belong only to the government; Turkish citizens are also outraged over Israel’s inhumane acts. The Turkish government is merely conveying this reaction to Israel. Koru thinks Israel’s call, which came suddenly, might be due to the financial repercussions Israel has been experiencing due to its damaged relations with Turkey. But Turkey should and will insist on its simple and realistic demands.

COMMENTS
Why is Turkey interfering with Israel? What is the difference between America forcing its will and interfering where it doesn't belong and Turkey insisting on interfering with Israel? Turkey should not get involved in foreign adventures.
winslowdream
The fact is that as long the author of the play Maskomya, which presented Freemasonry, Communism and Judaism as evil is in post of turkish PM nothing will be changed.
Ben Yacob
@ Kissenfloh: Piracy and murder upon International Waters by the minions of a war-mongering, terrorist state of allegedly superior theocrats IS considered to be humane? What planet are you living on where murdering innocents of another nation is a humane gesture? Will the delusional and paranoid Isr...
Cherokee
Such a nonsense! Nothing is more ridiculous than Turks calling Israel's selfdefensive measures inhumane while viewing the turkish massacres on armenians and kurds. Israel made maybe mistakes by overreakting on the Mavi Marmara, but Turkey has the stigma of genocide on its face.
Kissenfloh
Utter and absolute Turkish nonsense meant to satiate the hungry Turkish extreme nationalist appetite. Israel will never apologise for Mr. Erdogan's blunder and it will end the blockade only if and when terrorist Hamas ceases to fire rockets in Gaza and or ceases to exist. Regards
Thessalonian
Ozturk could not have misstated every point she raised if she wanted to. 1) Per the UN report (which Turkey supported until it went against them) the Israeli actions against the Mavi Marmara were legal but that they used excessive force. 2) Israel had offered both compensation
rich
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
22 May 2013
AK Party’s Plans B and C for constitution
21 May 2013
Alarm bells for CHP
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
25 January 2013
The CHP in contradiction with its leftist image
24 January 2013
Shadow cast over peace plans
23 January 2013
Paris killings get even more complicated
22 January 2013
Not Kurdish problem, democracy problem
21 January 2013
Good signs
20 January 2013
Turkey's struggle against its phobias
18 January 2013
First test on the long road to peace
17 January 2013
Six answers to ‘Why now'
16 January 2013
Language needed for peace
15 January 2013
Syria's possible role in the Paris killings
...
Bloggers