Will we go to war in Syria?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 May 2013 Monday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 09 October 2012, Tuesday 0 0 0 0
MERVE BÜŞRA ÖZTÜRK
b.ozturk@todayszaman.com

Will we go to war in Syria?

Tensions between Syria and Turkey continue to escalate, with the two countries exchanging cross-border fire for almost a week.

The Turkish government has been given the green light to send troops into Syria if it decides such action is needed. The question Turkish columnists are trying to answer now is whether Turkey plans to do so.

“A war with Syria would not be about defeating Syria. It would carry with it serious risks that Turkey and the rest of the region would be dragged into new problems. Reducing the situation to ‘a problem with [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad’ would mean ignoring the complexity of the region,” Sami Kohen of the Milliyet daily wrote.

Kohen says there are two possible aims behind the recent spillover of Syrian shelling into Turkey: Either Assad wants to drag Turkey into a war or he wants to quash the rebels along the Turkish-Syrian border, which would also deter Turkey from supporting the opposition fighters. Kohen thinks Assad cannot be so crazy as to want a war with Turkey at such a critical time but believes Assad may have taken the risk of starting a war just to take out the opposition fighters along the border. But has Turkey also taken a risk of going to war? Kohen says that although Ankara certainly does not want such a war, it is prepared for every possibility.

Bugün’s Gültekin Avcı asks another question in his article: “If the worst case scenario happens and a war breaks out, then with which country or countries will we find ourselves at war?” If it would only be Syria, then we wouldn’t be in such a complicated situation today. But Syria is a place in which the axis of Russia, China and Iran is playing a critical game of chess with Western actors.

Sedat Laçiner meanwhile ponders the ways in which Turkey could overcome the crisis with Syria in his article in the Star daily. He first says that all of Turkey’s political opposition parties should stop using the Syrian issue as an instrument to attack the government because the government’s Syria policy essentially aims to protect all of Turkey and not just the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) alone. The opposition parties should be well aware of this distinction. Secondly, he says Turkey should keep all options, including meeting with Assad, on the negotiating table with Syria. If we can discuss meeting with terrorists today, then there should not be anyone with whom we cannot sit and talk for the sake of our country’s security, Laçiner notes.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
20 May 2013
What did Turkey get from the Obama meeting?
17 May 2013
CHP's steady inconsistency
16 May 2013
Syria and terrorism
15 May 2013
Media ban was wrong move
14 May 2013
Intended message behind Reyhanlı blasts
13 May 2013
Reyhanlı blast
12 May 2013
CHP's fall
10 May 2013
Overcoming constitution dilemma
9 May 2013
PKK's choice
8 May 2013
Withdrawal begins
7 May 2013
For better democracy
6 May 2013
The core of settlement
3 May 2013
May Day failure
2 May 2013
Return of May Day riot
1 May 2013
Cooperation against settlement
30 April 2013
Reactions to the wise
29 April 2013
Turkey's social agreement project
28 April 2013
Expectations from the next stage in the process
26 April 2013
Withdrawal not a tactic but a strategy
25 April 2013
First stage of the settlement process
24 April 2013
Impartiality of the state, tragic events of 1915
23 April 2013
Why do they object to the settlement initiative?
22 April 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's Pyrrhic victory
21 April 2013
Wise people's journey
19 April 2013
Nationalists' defeat of reformists within CHP
18 April 2013
Peace and democracy
17 April 2013
Suggestion of new method for constitution
16 April 2013
Another black stain on judiciary
15 April 2013
Reasons behind Kandil's reluctance
11 April 2013
Bahçeli’s attempt at provocation
10 April 2013
Right of resistance
9 April 2013
War of propaganda in Ergenekon trial
8 April 2013
Peace through grassroots mobility
5 April 2013
Turkey's opposition, an obstacle to settlement?
4 April 2013
More or less of a Turk?
3 April 2013
First peace, then democracy
2 April 2013
How should the PKK retreat?
1 April 2013
Including PKK in sphere of law
31 March 2013
New constitution embracing all ethnicities
29 March 2013
Controversial statement on citizenship
28 March 2013
Questions over the process of withdrawal
27 March 2013
Democracy for everyone, not only Kurds
26 March 2013
Diplomatic thaw with Israel
25 March 2013
Apology is product of Zeitgeist
22 March 2013
This Nevruz heralds peaceful springs
21 March 2013
Terror companies sharing PKK's clients
20 March 2013
Lack of support will be reflected at the ballot box
19 March 2013
Conflict between pessimists, optimists
18 March 2013
Drawing lessons from others' experiences
17 March 2013
Peace process a test for CHP?
15 March 2013
Will there be a price for laying down weapons?
14 March 2013
First token of good intentions
13 March 2013
Opposition's lack of maturity
12 March 2013
A democratization project
11 March 2013
Demands no longer enforced by arms
8 March 2013
Calls for action before truly celebrating Women's Day
7 March 2013
Risks of too much transparency
6 March 2013
Road to peace always thorny
5 March 2013
What is good journalism?
4 March 2013
Is it a provocation-proof process?
3 March 2013
Challenges of the peace process
1 March 2013
More sabotage, more calls for caution
28 February 2013
Too early for a sigh of relief
27 February 2013
Öcalan's failure in communication
26 February 2013
Test for Öcalan's authority
25 February 2013
Possible roadmap of peace process
22 February 2013
Presidential system under today's circumstances
21 February 2013
Violent protests in the Black Sea region
20 February 2013
Violent protests aimed at creating ‘Turkish issue'
19 February 2013
The dilemma of the new constitution
18 February 2013
Crucial balance of optimism and realism
15 February 2013
Error and essence of coup trials
14 February 2013
CHP torn between nationalists, peace initiative supporters
13 February 2013
Little known about deadly blast, many worries
12 February 2013
Political consensus on a new constitution
11 February 2013
Speculation over Erdoğan's visit
10 February 2013
EU, SCO no viable alternatives
8 February 2013
A sign of judicial activism
7 February 2013
The EU's challenges
6 February 2013
Turkey's pursuit of int'l cooperation
5 February 2013
Challenging steps of peace strategy
4 February 2013
Political test awaits Turkey
3 February 2013
More than an anti-American attack
1 February 2013
Vision Shanghai Five offers
31 January 2013
Güler's remark core of Kurdish issue
30 January 2013
The CHP's problems swept under the carpet
29 January 2013
Different stances in Mali and Syria
28 January 2013
Turning towards the East
25 January 2013
The CHP in contradiction with its leftist image
24 January 2013
Shadow cast over peace plans
23 January 2013
Paris killings get even more complicated
22 January 2013
Not Kurdish problem, democracy problem
21 January 2013
Good signs
20 January 2013
Turkey's struggle against its phobias
18 January 2013
First test on the long road to peace
17 January 2013
Six answers to ‘Why now'
16 January 2013
Language needed for peace
15 January 2013
Syria's possible role in the Paris killings
14 January 2013
Scenarios over the Paris slayings
13 January 2013
Message of Paris slayings
...