Bingöl: 20 years ago, 20 years later
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 September 2012, Thursday 1 0 0 0
ORHAN MİROĞLU
o.miroglu@todayszaman.com

Bingöl: 20 years ago, 20 years later

Two decades ago, soldiers who had just been discharged from mandatory military service were ambushed on the Bingöl-Elazığ road. The vehicles carrying the soldiers in civilian clothing were stopped on the road; 40 of them were also kidnapped.

These soldiers were executed; only those who played dead or escaped saved their lives; but 33 soldiers were killed.

However, the government would have convened a meeting to discuss general amnesty on that day. Turgut Özal convinced Abdullah Öcalan to agree on a truce, using Jalal Talabani as a mediator. This move raised hopes for peace.

On April 15, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) declared a cease-fire, but two days later, on April 17, Özal died; his death still remains a mystery. A court recently ruled for the exhumation of his body in an ongoing investigation into his death. And 35 days after his death, a massacre was committed in Bingöl to make sure that no single shred of hope for peace would remain.

When it comes to the Kurdish question, Turkey rapidly returned to a state of terror and violence after this massacre. The most important peace initiative on this issue became unfruitful. No serious investigation has been carried out to resolve what really happened.

Military authorities argued that everything was normal; no investigation was initiated against them. President Abdullah Gül has assigned the state inspection agency to investigate Özal’s death; a court has ruled for the exhumation of Özal’s body. Undoubtedly, this is an important development. But the people wish the same prudence and sensitivity was demonstrated to ensure that the massacre of the 33 soldiers is also properly investigated. Twenty years after the original massacre, a similar massacre was committed on the Muş-Bingöl highway. This time, the number of unarmed soldiers in civilian outfits was 200. Ten died in an attack which also left behind 70 wounded.

If the attackers had been able to carry a few more rockets to the site, none of the 200 soldiers would have come out alive. It is possible to raise hundreds of questions on this matter, including how the terrorists took heavy arms to the site in daytime over flat land. But I am afraid that, as usual, none of these questions will be answered and the incident will remain forgotten.

Some commentators hold that because it enjoys popular support, the PKK is quickly able to mobilize. The PKK is not new; it has attracted the support of the people; otherwise, how could it keep fighting for so many years? Some supply the PKK with vehicles to carry rockets and other heavy arms; this is fine…

But how could the PKK have known that 200 soldiers would be transported that day?

Who gave it this information? One of the locals living there? If this is the case, then this is even more concerning. If the people living in a province where eight police officers were killed only a few days ago knew that 200 soldiers were going to be transferred to their battalion, then this shows that there is a serious problem and irresponsibility involved. To be honest, I don’t really believe in the possibility of that.

I think the Ergenekon formation still maintains its existence, at least in that part of the country, because this formation, whose foundation was laid in the 1990s, still maintains itself. And when the Ergenekon trial and arrests began, the PKK became a beacon of hope for such circles.

The PKK did not fail in responding to this hope with the “revolutionary people’s war” strategy that it employed after the Silvan attack. Those who had placed their expectations on this hope were not disappointed. Turkey became a country that wakes up to the news of death each morning. As such, I think it would be more intelligent to search for a formation that betrays, instead of individuals who betray, in both this case as well as others. This is because no “traitor” will be willing to be party to an attack in which 200 soldiers would lose their lives by themselves.

When the Uludere-Roboski massacre took place, I thought of nothing before Ergenekon. I think the same thing of the Bingöl massacre. The government took important steps in order to put an end to the system of military tutelage. There is still a great deal to do, but the fact that a chief of General Staff is being tried and that another chief of General Staff is acting as a witness in a case are historic events.

Military tutelage has for the most part maintained its existence in the Kurdish lands. Turkey is maintaining its battle against the PKK with an army that is more or less becoming normalized. In operations which took place with a few battalions, sometimes even villages that are located in the area are emptied out, but none of the civilians are hurt in any way. The power and activities of JİTEM, which was established under the Gendarmerie General Command and has signed its names to thousands of unsolved murders, have been stopped and the village guard (“koruculuk”) system -- which was a center of criminal activity in the 1990s -- has been placed under control.

Despite this, we know nothing about the structure of Ergenekon past the Euphrates.

We are unable to ask about the “inner” face-off of the second Bingöl. I am afraid experiencing a third or fourth Bingöl will be inevitable for us.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
14 June 2013
Do the Gezi Park protesters subscribe to an ideology?
13 June 2013
Toward the Gezi Park referendum
7 June 2013
Turkey has great trouble with history
6 June 2013
Gezi Park
31 May 2013
Is an Assad-free solution possible?
30 May 2013
May 27 coup and democratic experience
24 May 2013
Kurds, settlement process and political attention
23 May 2013
Feb. 28 indictment a victory for democracy
17 May 2013
Disappointment in Hrant Dink case
16 May 2013
Son of al-Assad following in footsteps of father
12 May 2013
A life like everyone else has
9 May 2013
New era, new politics
3 May 2013
The Ottomans, the state system and today's reality
2 May 2013
A noteworthy hearing in Diyarbakır
26 April 2013
The PKK is withdrawing; neo-nationalists are gathering under a national umbrella
25 April 2013
Do Kurdish civil politicians think differently than those in Kandil?
19 April 2013
International actors and the peace process
18 April 2013
Is the CHP splitting?
12 April 2013
What did you give the PKK?
11 April 2013
Questions not asked to Umberto Eco
5 April 2013
It was politics that opened the way
4 April 2013
At home and in the world: wise people
29 March 2013
Hizmet movement to address Armenian issue
22 March 2013
Will the PKK bury its arms?
21 March 2013
Past crimes and prosecutor's opinion at Ergenekon trial
15 March 2013
Syriacs in Turkey and their rights
14 March 2013
Syriacs in Sweden
8 March 2013
Is the BDP the CHP of the Kurds?
7 March 2013
Does Öcalan have a vision for the future?
1 March 2013
Who leaked the minutes from the meeting with Öcalan?
28 February 2013
Feb. 28, Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and discrediting
22 February 2013
Paradigms of nationalism and prime minister's three speeches
15 February 2013
Will the peace talks fail?
14 February 2013
News from the PKK
8 February 2013
Don't say ‘You have a chance to become a Turk'; no one would believe you
7 February 2013
Dear Turks, your way is wrong
1 February 2013
Assad's Kurdish policy
31 January 2013
Isolation of the Syrian people
25 January 2013
A standard case of racism
24 January 2013
Right to court defense in one's mother tongue
18 January 2013
Following Mehmet Ali Birand
17 January 2013
Role of leaders in solution processes
11 January 2013
Peace-haters
10 January 2013
Who wants peace?
4 January 2013
What are the challenges of the new negotiations?
3 January 2013
The past and present of the Kurdish question
28 December 2012
Accounting for what occurred in Uludere
27 December 2012
In memory of Şerafettin Elçi
21 December 2012
Empathy
20 December 2012
Will rebellion be born of brutality and repression?
14 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (2)
13 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (1)
7 December 2012
Indecisive Maliki v. decisive Barzani
6 December 2012
In the eyes of a mother
30 November 2012
New status for Palestine
29 November 2012
Immunities
23 November 2012
Is there a crack in the CHP?
22 November 2012
While Sept. 12 is on trial
16 November 2012
Leyla Zana and Feleknas Uca
15 November 2012
A new era with Obama
9 November 2012
Feb. 28 and collective memory
8 November 2012
Unsettling witness in Ergenekon case
2 November 2012
The republic and peace
1 November 2012
Hunger strikes: 30 years ago, 30 years after
19 October 2012
When the EU fears its future
18 October 2012
The EU and the Nobel Peace Prize
12 October 2012
The Öcalan proposal and Feb. 28’s unfinished business
11 October 2012
Confronting Feb. 28
7 October 2012
Heading towards 2071: Turks and Kurds
4 October 2012
Assad’s new move
28 September 2012
Optional lessons
27 September 2012
Balyoz case
21 September 2012
CHP and Oslo process
20 September 2012
Bingöl: 20 years ago, 20 years later
14 September 2012
Common future
13 September 2012
Turks and Kurds
7 September 2012
‘Time for Justice'
6 September 2012
A ‘wise men’ formula and Turkey
2 September 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (3)
31 August 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (2)
30 August 2012
Psycholoical warfare and Kurdish issue (1)
24 August 2012
Sheikh Fethullah and Arameans
23 August 2012
The PKK
17 August 2012
The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil
16 August 2012
‘Dersim is surrounded by four mountains’
10 August 2012
An untimely debate
9 August 2012
What do Kurds want?
3 August 2012
Davutoğlu’s visit to Arbil
2 August 2012
Whistling a Kurdish tune
27 July 2012
Is the real problem peshmergas sent from Arbil to Syria?
26 July 2012
Writers and readers
20 July 2012
Karayılan’s reply to call for cease-fire
19 July 2012
The powers that be
13 July 2012
Settling accounts with the past and political will
12 July 2012
Settling accounts with coups and the 3rd judicial package
6 July 2012
Does prime minister hold Moses’ staff?
5 July 2012
If the prime minister wills
28 June 2012
Nationalist envisagement and the Nationalist Movement Party
21 June 2012
Turkish nationalists and change
14 June 2012
Special courts
...
Bloggers