Europe’s conscience
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
22 May 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 August 2012, Monday 7 0 0 0
ALİ BULAÇ
a.bulac@todayszaman.com

Europe’s conscience

A group of German and Austrian scholars, including Professor Udo Steinbach, Professor Jörg Becker and Erich Schmidt, made a declaration known as the “Manifesto of 25” in 2006. The European intellectuals in this declaration strongly opposed the exclusive type of relationship between the West and Israel under which the West expressed unconditional support to Israel due to the Holocaust, even during times when it visibly breached the rules of international law. Opposed to this approach, the intellectuals made a call to their respective governments to reconsider this matter and revisit their relations with the Israeli government.

The declaration, which stated that one of the unnoticed consequences of the Jewish genocide was related to the Palestinian people, also stressed that the Palestinians did not play any role in the emergence of the Middle East issue. The manifesto states that there should be no reference to the role of the Palestinians in the transference of what is a European problem to the Middle East. The drafters of the declaration also stressed that Europe was responsible vis-à-vis Israel, as well as the Palestinians.

One of the most interesting aspects of this declaration was its emphasis suggesting that the Europeans have taken one of their problems to the Middle East where the Palestinians played no role.

The West has experienced troubled relations with Jews throughout history. There have been issues related to racial differences, as well as theological disagreements, which can never be settled. The Jews, who have never felt safe, paid attention to education and trade over concerns that they would have to take their assets with them in times of emergency. Over time, the Jews have acquired control over monetary assets and wealth in their communities; according to Werner Sombart, the interest-loan system is a gift from the Jews to Europe in the emergence of Western capitalism. This has been the primary factor that provoked anti-Jewish sentiments, among others.

The Jews are so strongly subscribed and loyal to their religious and ethnic roots that they have not been assimilated. What has preserved them against assimilation is their religious identity and references. Those who could not assimilate them subjected them to ethnic cleansing -- which is what the Roman Empire attempted to do -- or genocide. This was what the Nazis did in the mid-20th century. It was not only the Germans but also France and other European nations who joined in this horrible genocide.

A state called Israel was created under these conditions after the Nazis were defeated. Only Islamic states have not tried to assimilate the Jews, subject them to ethnic cleansing or commit genocide against them. It was Western nations that committed the greatest brutalities against them. The reasons for the creation of the state of Israel, though not explicitly stated, can be summarized as follows: to get rid of the Jews and throw them out of continental Europe; to cut a deep wound in the heart of the Islamic world and keep them busy with Israel; to make up for the feeling of guilt over the Nazi crimes against the Jews by offering them a state; and to create a center of protection that will represent Western interests in the region. (For more information, see my column on the Dünya Bülteni website dated May 12, 2011.)

In maintaining their silence and indifference to Israeli atrocities, the Western public and intellectuals consider the third option. But it appears that the credit they have granted Israel is about to expire. They are running out of patience because while trying to impose noble values, including the rule of law, fundamental rights and freedoms, upon the entire world, the EU contradicts itself when it exempts Israel from compliance with general legal customs and sanctions. The West now realizes that the primary reason for the ongoing tragedy in the Middle East is the Palestinian issue, referred to as the mother of all issues. In the end, just as the Nazi genocide disturbed the conscience, the Palestinian and Middle East tragedy will disturb the conscience.

COMMENTS
"Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the sci...
xanthor
Where do Jews live today? In Muslim countries or in the West?
W Here
Where are the Jews living today? In the Muslim world on in Europe?
Si Mple
To quote the author "the Jews so strongly subscribed and stayed loyal to their religious
rich
Bunch of utter hogwash. The west didn't invent Zionism (which existed long before WWII) and neither did the West export antisemitism to middle eastern countries, since they all had a strong anti-Jew tradition going back centuries, including back in the days of the oh-so tolerant Ottoman Empire.
Menk
muslim states like turkey didn't have time to go after the jews... they were busy slaughtering Armenians!
lawrence of Arabia
Wow!! Impressive! This time Mr Bulac, a sholar in religion, managed to promote hate against not only one, but two!!, of the cultures he hates. Both the West and the Jews. To me though, it is scary to see a man or religion being so full of hate against everything outside his domain of religion.
Scary
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
21 May 2013
Does secularization modernize societies? (1)
13 May 2013
If the world is not possible, then man isn't either!
6 May 2013
Testing liberal theory in practice
29 April 2013
Moral marginals
22 April 2013
Demanding rights!
15 April 2013
Authentic pluralism
8 April 2013
Higher reference
1 April 2013
Is democracy a sword of Damocles?
25 March 2013
Ways of cancelling the will of the majority
18 March 2013
Liberal contradiction
11 March 2013
What does democracy offer religion?
4 March 2013
Changing criteria for Muslims
25 February 2013
Who is testing whom?
18 February 2013
The democracy test
11 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (2)
4 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (1)
28 January 2013
Is non-Western modernization possible?
21 January 2013
Modernization, Westernization and secularism (1)
14 January 2013
Can religion be separated from life?
7 January 2013
Burning in fire of dissension sparked by unprincipled people
31 December 2012
Escape from chaos
24 December 2012
Lumpenization of bedouins
17 December 2012
Turkey’s Islam
10 December 2012
Reasons not to trust the EU
3 December 2012
Genius and taqwa
26 November 2012
What is ‘national’?
19 November 2012
UN must be restructured
12 November 2012
The world in the new era
5 November 2012
What about hunger strikes?
29 October 2012
What are we sacrificing?
22 October 2012
Turkish model
15 October 2012
Three models of Islam
8 October 2012
New political culture
1 October 2012
The way we perceive problems (2)
24 September 2012
The way we perceive problems (1)
17 September 2012
Global conspiracy
10 September 2012
A way out
3 September 2012
Religion in the name of what?
27 August 2012
Europe’s conscience
13 August 2012
Prayer
6 August 2012
Culture
30 July 2012
Society
23 July 2012
Tragedy of intellectuals
16 July 2012
Soroush’s fallacy
9 July 2012
Return to reason
2 July 2012
Once there was a Garaudy
25 June 2012
Founding actors of the region
18 June 2012
Some day, the West will realize
11 June 2012
Change of political name
4 June 2012
Search for a new model
28 May 2012
Islam is like a river
21 May 2012
What are the media? What do they do?
14 May 2012
Does anybody really know?
7 May 2012
On the army
30 April 2012
The political destiny of the Middle East
23 April 2012
The Middle East: tribe, spoils and faith
19 April 2012
Reading change (2)
16 April 2012
Reading change (1)
9 April 2012
Pluralism within Islam
5 April 2012
A single standard
2 April 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (2)
29 March 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (1)
26 March 2012
A new authority
26 March 2012
A new authority
22 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (2)
19 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (1)
15 March 2012
Handling the modernity crisis
12 March 2012
Democratization of education
8 March 2012
What is wisdom and purpose?
5 March 2012
Finding what we have lost
1 March 2012
Those who migrate, those who force others to migrate
27 February 2012
A challenging solution for Syria
24 February 2012
From Alparslan to Salahuddin!
16 February 2012
How does Iran get stronger?
13 February 2012
The state on target: Iran
9 February 2012
Sunni-Shiite-secular
6 February 2012
Wars of religion
2 February 2012
Sectarian wars
30 January 2012
The ‘other’ and our need to be ‘threatened’
26 January 2012
Salvation, not welfare
23 January 2012
Modern meaning of history
19 January 2012
Rational basis of religious violence
16 January 2012
Righteous reason and a pure disposition
12 January 2012
Enlightenment, Islam and intellect
9 January 2012
Controversy within Europe
5 January 2012
Could Christianity transform?
2 January 2012
Return to Christianity
29 December 2011
Reminding Europe of its identity
26 December 2011
Social gender
22 December 2011
NATO and Afghanistan
15 December 2011
Cause of the problem
12 December 2011
Two steps forward, one step back
8 December 2011
Thought crime
5 December 2011
Point of reference for our rights and freedoms
1 December 2011
Mistakes in Syria
28 November 2011
Concerns over Syria
24 November 2011
The single article of the Constitution
21 November 2011
There is a message for us!
17 November 2011
Human sin
14 November 2011
Lessons from the Prophet Jonah who left Nineveh
...