The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 August 2012, Friday 5 0 0 0
ORHAN MİROĞLU
o.miroglu@todayszaman.com

The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil

If he had obtained a visa from Baghdad, Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) leader Devlet Bahçeli would be visiting Kirkuk during Eid and attending a program organized in his honor.

However, acting like a “tribal state,” Baghdad denied the visa to Bahçeli. Bahçeli had to cancel his visit although he would love to go there. This incident is significant in many respects and deserves to be discussed in depth:

-- in terms of the Iraqi government’s attitude,

-- in terms of the MHP’s insistence on not recognizing the Kurdistan Regional Government, just 80 kilometers away from Kirkuk, and

-- within the framework of how the Turkish nationalism fails to acknowledge the tremendous changes that have occurred as regards the Kurdish issue in the region and in Turkey and turns this ignorance into a political attitude that is beneficial to no one and that will harm peace between peoples.

Baghdad may be criticized for denying a visa to a political leader who in the past served as deputy prime minister. Indeed, this has been amply done by our media. Recently, Baghdad had expressed its unhappiness about Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu visiting Kirkuk via Arbil and harshly criticized him for meeting with Turkmens, hinting at the possibility of the arrest of Mr. Davutoğlu.The Maliki administration in Iraq has long been anxious about the ties Turkey has established with the regional Kurdish government and is making this very clear at every opportunity. However, given the developments and the incidents in Syria, it is not oracular to say that our government’s ties with Massoud Barzani will be stronger in the future.

In this setting, it was easy to predict that any relation Turkish nationalists would like to establish with Kirkuk’s Turkmens, even in the context of an Eid visit, would not be perceived as acceptable by Baghdad, which would be more inclined to see it as a “cross-border nationalist solidarity” effort.

Therefore, the MHP should have guessed that Baghdad might deny them a visa, particularly at a time when the swords had been unsheathed between Iraq and Turkey and the uneasiness created by Davutoğlu’s visit still lingers. And they should have realized that it is possible to go to Kirkuk via Arbil in future, if not now.

However, commenting on the incident in a TV interview, MHP deputy Tuğrul Türkeş had a hard time responding to the questions about whether they should take the Arbil route to Kirkuk. “Turkish Airlines [THY] has flights to Mosul and Baghdad. It is for this reason we preferred to go to Kirkuk via Baghdad,” he said. But THY has flights to Arbil as well. Plus the Arbil airport is better than the Baghdad airport in terms of security and comfort, and it is an airport with international standards. And Kirkuk is located 80 kilometers away from Arbil. Furthermore, no visa is needed for this route.

The Arbil government has good political ties with Turkmens in Kirkuk and across Kurdistan. They don’t raise any objections to the presence and demands of Turkmens. Turkmens are represented in the Arbil parliament and they face no problems enjoying their cultural and political rights. The disagreement on the status and future of Kirkuk is not between Turkmens and Arbil, but between Arbil and the central government. Saddam Hussein’s regime had targeted both Turkmens and Kurds. The Arabization of Kirkuk has been detrimental both to Turkmens and Kurds.

In other words, they shared a common fate under Hussein. Kurds and Turkmens have always been loyal to the political responsibilities and relations required by this common fate.

Turkmens are represented in the Kurdistan parliament in proportion to their population. For the Turkmen bourgeoisie, Arbil is Iraq’s most peaceful and secure city. Turkmens have a sizable share in the services sectors, especially in hotel management. All this change must be re-assessed by Turkish nationalists.

A number of businessmen who are said to be MHP supporters from the Black Sea and Central Anatolia are undertaking medium- and large-scale projects in Arbil. And they are well aware of the fact that they are operating in Kurdistan.

Mr. Bahçeli and Turkish nationalists must realize that the road to Kirkuk goes through recognizing these changes and the Kurdish reality and stopping denying this fact. Today, it is no longer possible to use Turkmens in Kirkuk and Kurdistan for domestic policy purposes in Turkey. It is high time that Turkish nationalists and Kemalists change their useless policies in Turkey. Despite the tremendous change in the region, neither the MHP nor the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) has made an official visit to Arbil.

Yet, even a meaningful visit to Arbil could change the current political climate and make a great contribution to peace.

COMMENTS
The road to Political solution in some part of the World goes through the western well protected domain of HYPOCRISY
Zahra Niknafs
Kirkuk is Kurdistan , the inhabitant are Azeries Shia pro Iran , The Arab squaters are planted by saddaam are Shia takes their order from Nejef, The Kurds are the majority , Now where is Turkey in this equation???
Esfandyar
"The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil" Wrong. It goes through Baghdad.
David
I think it is the time that Mr bahceli would have recognised, given the rapid transformation that have taken place in Turkey, dwelling in the past cannot be the best way forward for his outdated ideology.
Nageyec
I am sooooo saddened that they did not give Bahceli the Visa to go to Kirkuk, As Erdogan and Davutoglu have been introduced to the Kurdish flag in Kirkuk so Bahceli would have also been greeted with the Kurdish flag, children greeting him with Kurdish flags and saying "Bahceli, Kurdistan Hosgeldeniz...
kurdo
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
Disappointment in Hrant Dink case
16 May 2013
Son of al-Assad following in footsteps of father
12 May 2013
A life like everyone else has
9 May 2013
New era, new politics
3 May 2013
The Ottomans, the state system and today's reality
2 May 2013
A noteworthy hearing in Diyarbakır
26 April 2013
The PKK is withdrawing; neo-nationalists are gathering under a national umbrella
25 April 2013
Do Kurdish civil politicians think differently than those in Kandil?
19 April 2013
International actors and the peace process
18 April 2013
Is the CHP splitting?
12 April 2013
What did you give the PKK?
11 April 2013
Questions not asked to Umberto Eco
5 April 2013
It was politics that opened the way
4 April 2013
At home and in the world: wise people
29 March 2013
Hizmet movement to address Armenian issue
22 March 2013
Will the PKK bury its arms?
21 March 2013
Past crimes and prosecutor's opinion at Ergenekon trial
15 March 2013
Syriacs in Turkey and their rights
14 March 2013
Syriacs in Sweden
8 March 2013
Is the BDP the CHP of the Kurds?
7 March 2013
Does Öcalan have a vision for the future?
1 March 2013
Who leaked the minutes from the meeting with Öcalan?
28 February 2013
Feb. 28, Bediüzzaman Said Nursi and discrediting
22 February 2013
Paradigms of nationalism and prime minister's three speeches
15 February 2013
Will the peace talks fail?
14 February 2013
News from the PKK
8 February 2013
Don't say ‘You have a chance to become a Turk'; no one would believe you
7 February 2013
Dear Turks, your way is wrong
1 February 2013
Assad's Kurdish policy
31 January 2013
Isolation of the Syrian people
25 January 2013
A standard case of racism
24 January 2013
Right to court defense in one's mother tongue
18 January 2013
Following Mehmet Ali Birand
17 January 2013
Role of leaders in solution processes
11 January 2013
Peace-haters
10 January 2013
Who wants peace?
4 January 2013
What are the challenges of the new negotiations?
3 January 2013
The past and present of the Kurdish question
28 December 2012
Accounting for what occurred in Uludere
27 December 2012
In memory of Şerafettin Elçi
21 December 2012
Empathy
20 December 2012
Will rebellion be born of brutality and repression?
14 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (2)
13 December 2012
Disinformation and a memory (1)
7 December 2012
Indecisive Maliki v. decisive Barzani
6 December 2012
In the eyes of a mother
30 November 2012
New status for Palestine
29 November 2012
Immunities
23 November 2012
Is there a crack in the CHP?
22 November 2012
While Sept. 12 is on trial
16 November 2012
Leyla Zana and Feleknas Uca
15 November 2012
A new era with Obama
9 November 2012
Feb. 28 and collective memory
8 November 2012
Unsettling witness in Ergenekon case
2 November 2012
The republic and peace
1 November 2012
Hunger strikes: 30 years ago, 30 years after
19 October 2012
When the EU fears its future
18 October 2012
The EU and the Nobel Peace Prize
12 October 2012
The Öcalan proposal and Feb. 28’s unfinished business
11 October 2012
Confronting Feb. 28
7 October 2012
Heading towards 2071: Turks and Kurds
4 October 2012
Assad’s new move
28 September 2012
Optional lessons
27 September 2012
Balyoz case
21 September 2012
CHP and Oslo process
20 September 2012
Bingöl: 20 years ago, 20 years later
14 September 2012
Common future
13 September 2012
Turks and Kurds
7 September 2012
‘Time for Justice'
6 September 2012
A ‘wise men’ formula and Turkey
2 September 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (3)
31 August 2012
Psychological warfare and Kurdish issue (2)
30 August 2012
Psycholoical warfare and Kurdish issue (1)
24 August 2012
Sheikh Fethullah and Arameans
23 August 2012
The PKK
17 August 2012
The road to Kirkuk goes through Arbil
16 August 2012
‘Dersim is surrounded by four mountains’
10 August 2012
An untimely debate
9 August 2012
What do Kurds want?
3 August 2012
Davutoğlu’s visit to Arbil
2 August 2012
Whistling a Kurdish tune
27 July 2012
Is the real problem peshmergas sent from Arbil to Syria?
26 July 2012
Writers and readers
20 July 2012
Karayılan’s reply to call for cease-fire
19 July 2012
The powers that be
13 July 2012
Settling accounts with the past and political will
12 July 2012
Settling accounts with coups and the 3rd judicial package
6 July 2012
Does prime minister hold Moses’ staff?
5 July 2012
If the prime minister wills
28 June 2012
Nationalist envisagement and the Nationalist Movement Party
21 June 2012
Turkish nationalists and change
14 June 2012
Special courts
7 June 2012
CHP’s ‘Kurdish initiative’
31 May 2012
The matter of interlocutorship
24 May 2012
‘Strategic vision’
17 May 2012
İstanbul-Arbil alliance
10 May 2012
About Dersim while Dersim archives are being opened
3 May 2012
Memory, wars and past time
26 April 2012
Ah, that symmetry!
...