Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
24 May 2013 Friday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 08 August 2012, Wednesday 4 0 0 0
İHSAN YILMAZ
ihsan.yilmaz@todayszaman.com

Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism

When asked, our politicians vehemently respond that they have contingency plans for every scenario, but what good is a plan if it is not implemented when it is most needed? There are several concrete examples. In post-Saddam Iraq, our state tried to use the so-called Turkmen card against the Kurds and Shia. Then, at the elections, most of these Turkmen voted for Shia parties and our state discovered that most of these Turkmen were Shia and their religious identity was important for them. Now, initially, our rulers and media reacted very harshly to the Kurdish autonomy demands in Northern Syria and gave the impression that they are not happy with Kurds gaining more rights than the Kurds in Turkey have.

The impression we got was that our state was not expecting such a move by the Syrian Kurds, Barzani and so on. Of course, they deny this and say they have known everything and have had plans for every possibility. But this does not explain both our state’s and the media’s Turkish nationalist reaction against the Kurdish activities in Northern Syria. After initial harsh reactions, discovering that we were losing the hearts and minds of both Turkey’s and Syria’s Kurds, we modified our harsh rhetoric and underlined that we would be happy with Kurds having rights but are against the activities of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Northern Syria. If you are misunderstood, you must first blame yourself and check your rhetoric. If you knew everything, why did not you invite and inform the media about the probabilities and warn them against emotional and harmful reactions? It seems we are having a similar case with regards to Iran, too.

When we, as analysts, warned our politicians repeatedly about Iran, we were blamed of being under the influence of the US, Israel, the West, NATO, etc. The reaction was always from the other extreme of the spectrum: You want Turkey to have a war with Iran. It is like Nasreddin Hoca’s wise joke: When reminded about troubles of summers and winters, Hoca replies that nothing is wrong with spring and fall. As analysts, we were not asking the government to wage a war against Iran but were simply questioning if it was worth giving the impression that Turkey was an advocate of Iran’s elusive nuclear ambitions and adventures to the detriment of our relations with the West. Our proactive pro-Iranian stance -- coupled with the tension with terrorist Israel -- culminated in pressuring Turkey that it had to prove there was no axis shift. Thus, Turkey had to accept the NATO missile shield in Kurecik, Malatya.

I love utopias but know we need to take into account the reality and work within given parameters. Thus, I do not think there is a better alternative to NATO at the moment and I think the Kurecik decision was a right one. What I am saying is that with the Kurecik decision, the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) betrayed its own pro-Iranian and to a certain extent anti-Western foreign policy. In other words, they have come to our line of being cautious against Iran. Nevertheless, we must ask: at what cost? Iranians are now angrier with Turkey than they were 10 years ago since they justifiably take the Kurecik decision personally! Our politicians keep repeating that Iran’s name is not mentioned in the Kurecik documents, but as far as I know no other country name is mentioned, either. So, why do we have it? It is of course for defense, but this shows that you no longer trust the Iranians and perceive it as a threat. I could not agree more. There are no permanent friends in the internal arena.

Now, in addition to the Kurecik decision, Iran’s open and staunch support for the Assad regime’s cruel terrorist massacres is paving the way for increasing tension between Turkey and Iran. Similar to what happened with Ehud Olmert and Bashar al-Assad, our politicians are again taking it personally, are emotional and give harsher reactions than normally expected. Turkey was right to be upset with Israel’s terrorism and is right to be upset with Assad’s massacres. Yet, big states know how to control the tension and do not allow tension to control them. When you react very aggressively but then discover that you do not have means to implement your rhetoric, your credibility will be irrevocably tarnished. To recover this, you may need to take a radical but not a very calculated step, like the Kurecik one, creating more problems.

To cut a long story short, it is better late than never and it is good that our politicians have now finally “discovered” Islamist Iran’s hybrid Persian-Shia nationalism. However, this disappointment does not lead us to a war or increased uncontrollable tension with Iran. Neighbors do not have to be in love or hate relationship. What is wrong with spring or fall for that matter?

COMMENTS
Dean Acchison USA secretery of State in 1950 and on .Describe his confusion about Iran Politics by saying" apparently in Middle East what you see is not what it is"
Esfandyar
Just remember one thing, anyone with ill intensions towards Iran should remember what happened to Iraq. every Iraqi will pay with their blood for every drop of Iranian blood spilt for centuries to come. Remember what Saddam said when they were hanging him, quote, 'watch these evil Iranians'. I wonde...
maz
This article title worth a million Euro, the title alone. Turks of twenty century got into notion of possibillity of changing matters by changing their lable, and or name. thus Kurds became mountian torks ,Fascisim became seculerisim, genocide became deciplinery action against insurgent ,ra...
Esfandyar
Thoroughly grasping and very blunt. Ihsan abi, Iran is an enigma not to the Arab world but also the rest. Syria has exposed for many anti-US and earlier pro-Iran folks too. Turkey's recent snub to the Iranian foreign minister needs to be backed up with similar straight talking otherwise it would com...
Naveed Ahmad
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
22 May 2013
The AKP's presidential system?
17 May 2013
Turkey, US and Russia on Syria
15 May 2013
Reyhanlı, the next 25 years and Alevis
10 May 2013
Politicians, privileges and Islamic law
8 May 2013
Politicians and corruption in Turkey
3 May 2013
Polarization
1 May 2013
Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul
26 April 2013
1915 (2)
24 April 2013
1915 (1)
19 April 2013
From Islamism to either post-Islamism or ‘lost Islamism'
17 April 2013
Erdoğan: both an asset and a liability for the new Turkey
12 April 2013
Disappointment in Turkish Islamists vis-à-vis press freedoms
10 April 2013
The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel
3 April 2013
‘General Will,' Kemalists and neo-Kemalists
29 March 2013
Practicing Muslims and social (in)justice
27 March 2013
Wise men?
22 March 2013
Öcalan, PKK, AKP, Erdoğan
20 March 2013
From Hasan Cemal
15 March 2013
The İmralı peace process and defaming Hizmet
13 March 2013
Freedom of the press in Turkey
8 March 2013
Criticizing authoritarian tendencies and practices of today
6 March 2013
Apo TV
1 March 2013
Turkish nationalism and my Said Nursi
27 February 2013
I am not a nationalist
22 February 2013
Modern age slavery and practicing Muslims
20 February 2013
The new constitution and social-engineering the “best” citizen
15 February 2013
How my message was distorted by a Western ‘journalist'
13 February 2013
Practicing Muslims, human rights and global Hilf al-Fudul
8 February 2013
Caring for the 42 percent, the new constitution and Abant spirit
6 February 2013
Shanghai criteria, the EU and our Islamists
1 February 2013
Social (in)justice in Turkey
30 January 2013
Quality of academics and scholars in Turkey
25 January 2013
The Kurdish initiative, the AKP and losing the Kurds
18 January 2013
In memory of Mehmet Ali Birand
9 January 2013
Practicing Muslims and negotiating with the Kurdists
4 January 2013
Practicing Muslims' old and new problems with meritocracy
2 January 2013
Meritocracy and practicing Muslims
28 December 2012
Erdoğan and Ergenekon: two options
26 December 2012
Kemalo-Islamists
21 December 2012
Taxation, social justice, neo-liberalism, AKP and the Turkish Islamists
19 December 2012
Taraf and its enemies
14 December 2012
AKP and the Kurdish problem
12 December 2012
Turkish readings of Egyptian politics
7 December 2012
The AKP and the religious Kurds
5 December 2012
The ‘Patriots’ and the difficulty of being a Turkish Islamist
30 November 2012
The Palestinian state
28 November 2012
Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia
23 November 2012
Israeli brutality and the democratic gap in the Middle East
21 November 2012
‘Sacred, Secular, Twin Tolerations and the Hizmet’
16 November 2012
Syria, Israel and Turkey’s predicaments in the Middle East
9 November 2012
Failure of post-Islamism and construction of official Islam
7 November 2012
Who is tarnishing Turkey’s image?
2 November 2012
AKP as both asset, liability to worldwide Muslim politics
31 October 2012
The miserable opposition
24 October 2012
Qurbani in the Islamophobic Turkish media
19 October 2012
Kurdish villagers, Erdoğan and Gül
17 October 2012
The difficulty of criticizing the AKP
12 October 2012
Crying for the terrorists
10 October 2012
Positive signs at the İstanbul Forum
5 October 2012
Syrian cul-de-sac and remembering Cyprus 1974
3 October 2012
2023 vision: excellent; 2013 vision: absent
28 September 2012
Understanding Balyoz officers: the military as a total institution
26 September 2012
Anti-Erdoğanism and 2014
21 September 2012
Difficulty of being critical
19 September 2012
Reforming the army?
14 September 2012
Criticizing Hizmet
12 September 2012
MİT, the army, the Foreign Ministry and I
7 September 2012
Is Davutoğlu the culprit?
5 September 2012
Erdoğan and the PKK, his Achilles’ heel
31 August 2012
AKP, Hizmet and politics
29 August 2012
Defeating the AKP in elections?
24 August 2012
Silent intellectuals and talking to the PKK?
22 August 2012
The PKK and speaking the unspeakable
17 August 2012
The PKK and the people’s wish
10 August 2012
A failed fairy tale of a poor imprisoned German-Turk
9 August 2012
Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet Movement
8 August 2012
Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
3 August 2012
7 arrows of Kemalo-Islamism
1 August 2012
The AKP and the Alevi problem in Turkey
27 July 2012
Zero problems with (Kurdish) neighbors?
25 July 2012
Mor Gabriel Monastery and the new AKP
20 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (2)
18 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (1)
13 July 2012
AKP: No longer a democratizing force
11 July 2012
Domestic humanistic depth: missing dimension of Turkish foreign policy
6 July 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Quo vadis?
4 July 2012
Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet
29 June 2012
Syria and Turkish foreign policy
27 June 2012
Syria: winner take all?
22 June 2012
Abant Platform: perspectives on Turkey
20 June 2012
Hizmet and the Kurdish question
13 June 2012
‘Shallow-land’
8 June 2012
Kurdish issue, AKP and MHP
6 June 2012
Pluralism in Turkey and Islamism
1 June 2012
AKP: reverting back to Islamism?
30 May 2012
Revisiting the AKP
25 May 2012
The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists
23 May 2012
Who has infiltrated the Turkish state?
18 May 2012
Are there a few Hizmet(s)?
16 May 2012
The game against Hizmet
...