Özkök’s testimony puts an end to debates
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 06 August 2012, Monday 1 0 0 0
MARKAR ESAYAN
m.esayan@todayszaman.com

Özkök’s testimony puts an end to debates

A major development of last week was when former Chief of General Staff Gen. Hilmi Özkök testified as a witness at one of Turkey’s major trials, the one concerning Ergenekon -- a clandestine organization nested within the state trying to overthrow or manipulate the democratically elected government.

This was important because Gen. Özkök was at the head of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) when the junta members started to act to overthrow the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party). This was pure luck for the AK Party, which couldn’t yet exert full control over the TSK and the army maintained its domination over democratically elected governments. Little time had passed since the military overthrew the coalition government of the Welfare Party (RP) and True Path Party (DYP) --known as the Refah-Yol government -- in collaboration with media networks, business circles, the judiciary and the bureaucracy in what later came to be known as the postmodern coup of Feb. 28, 1997.

The mighty commanders of the Feb. 28 coup were arrogant and powerful enough to assert, “Feb. 28 will last for 1,000 years.” It was a routine task for them to start coup preparations when a religious party came to power. Most of the commanders had already agreed to stage a coup. A major obstacle to their plans was that the chief of General Staff, i.e., Özkök, did not agree with them.

Özkök can hardly be said to be an officer with a perfect attachment to universal democratic values. The TSK’s pro-pro-Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) and Kemalist tradition could hardly produce an officer who would pay respect to civilian politics and universal democratic rules. However, Özkök was a smart officer. He was aware that world thought had changed and a traditional or postmodern coup would not secure any foreign support. In his testimony, he makes clear that he, too, was upset by the AK Party and wanted it to go away. Only he didn’t opt for a drastic method of achieving this.

Whatever his motives were, he did not give way to the junta. He deserves respect for this. Özkök confessed that Land Forces Commander Aytaç Yalman proposed issuing a memorandum to the government. This testimony clearly proves the existence of the coup offense and the status of the retired commanders who are currently standing trial in the Ergenekon case is now clearer. Other than this, he also confessed that in 2004, CDs of the coup plans Ayışığı (Moonlight) and Yakamoz (Sea Sparkle) had been given to him. “The wording used in the plans suggested to me that they were penned by military officers. I didn’t share this with my subordinates. I had to be calm and cautious,” he said. Özkök also talked about another coup trial, the one concerning the Balyoz (Sledgehammer) coup plan, where 64 active duty generals and admirals are on trial on charges of attempting to overthrow the government. The trial’s indictment has very sound evidence despite the counter-propaganda. I believe some innocent people may be facing coup charges in the trial as their names appear in the chain of command. Most of them are low-ranking military officers. While I hope they will be acquitted of the charges, I, as an executive of the newspaper that exposed the Balyoz coup plan, can safely assert that the plan was a very serious one.

Özkök said the following about Balyoz: “I had just become chief of General Staff. It [the seminar about the plan] had been prepared routinely before I was appointed to office. I couldn’t attend that seminar because I was busy at that time. I ordered it to be held at the Land Forces Command. In this seminar, some matters were discussed beyond their intended purpose as a worst-case scenario. I heard that the names of real politicians were used. Then, I told Land Forces Commander Aytaç Yalman to launch an examination into this matter.”

Özkök is known to be very cautious in selecting his words while speaking, and this time, he speaks in a very clear manner and he asserts that the Ayışığı and Yakamoz coup plans of 2003 as well as the Balyoz coup plan, which was continually updated until 2009, are nothing but preparations for overthrowing the government. And this is confessed by the highest-ranking person in the military. Therefore, what he said has been registered as first degree evidence which can affect the course of the trial. The court will issue a final decision about the cases against Ergenekon and Balyoz by the end of this year. While the deep state was still strong, it was not easy to launch and maintain these trials. A very powerful coalition has tried to do their best to discredit these trials at home and aboard. What mattered amid this struggle was to maintain the process without denying anyone their due rights. As our judicial system is already in rags and tatters, any effort to maintain these trials via this system contained certain risks. I hope no innocent person is punished. What I expect is that the guilty will be punished and the innocent will be acquitted.

Turkey cannot make a fresh start without such a confrontation and catharsis.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 June 2013
The exit is democratization package and mindset revolution
16 June 2013
Accident
14 June 2013
A guide to understanding the Gezi crisis
12 June 2013
Getting out of the Gezi Park labyrinth
9 June 2013
Gezi and the honor of criticism
7 June 2013
Gezi: A bomb ready to explode
5 June 2013
Where will energy emanating from Gezi protests head?
2 June 2013
What happened in Taksim?
31 May 2013
A century of mistakes followed by a decade of change
29 May 2013
On chopped down trees in Gezi Park, new alcohol regulations
26 May 2013
Sevan Nişanyan and freedom of expression
24 May 2013
An Armenian from Turkey in Los Angeles (2)
22 May 2013
An Armenian from Turkey in Los Angeles...
19 May 2013
National unity and solidarity
17 May 2013
No libretto for history?
15 May 2013
Why all this violence?
12 May 2013
Turkey has to grow up
10 May 2013
Polarization and deep state
8 May 2013
Turkey's dilemma
5 May 2013
Getting rid of this shame
3 May 2013
What happened in Taksim on May 1?
1 May 2013
Is 1915 genocide or what?
28 April 2013
My father
26 April 2013
It's now democratization's turn
24 April 2013
Exit from a well 1,915 meters deep
21 April 2013
How should the events of 1915 be perceived
19 April 2013
This is almost the end for Kılıçdaroğlu
17 April 2013
All that is solid melts into air
14 April 2013
Without creating new ‘others'
12 April 2013
Will anything good come from Muslims?
10 April 2013
The price CHP pays for its stance
7 April 2013
As the CHP is dragged towards euthanasia
3 April 2013
Significance of new constitution for Turkey
31 March 2013
Gökçeada Greek Primary School and ghosts from the past
29 March 2013
The butterfly effect of the solution
27 March 2013
Leyla Zana's contribution to peace
24 March 2013
Hizmet movement and the peace process
22 March 2013
As the poisonous parentheses close
20 March 2013
If there was no Ergenekon trial
18 March 2013
CHP, not Turkey, will be partitioned
15 March 2013
Redeeming democracy
13 March 2013
CHP and peace
10 March 2013
The big peace gong has not rung yet
6 March 2013
Chemistry of and roadblocks to solution
3 March 2013
The provocations that have come to nothing
1 March 2013
When will big peace come?
27 February 2013
Kurdish politics on a test drive
24 February 2013
Logic of peace
22 February 2013
Are we really getting closer to peace?
20 February 2013
Transformation of nationalism
17 February 2013
Kurds, Muslims and neo-nationalists
15 February 2013
The CHP's İmralı ‘correction'
13 February 2013
Baykal coup in the CHP
10 February 2013
The dignity of politics and the deep state
8 February 2013
Opportunity for urban transformation
6 February 2013
Getting rid of the straitjacket
3 February 2013
Problems exhausted too
1 February 2013
Turkey's CHP problem
30 January 2013
Turkish issue and the CHP
27 January 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's choice
25 January 2013
Why can't we postpone the reforming of the state?
23 January 2013
Paris killings and their wake
20 January 2013
A tough week
18 January 2013
Dink case and democratization
16 January 2013
Post-PKK Turkey
13 January 2013
The PKK issue and provocations
11 January 2013
Supreme Court head prosecutor: Dink killed by an organization
9 January 2013
Tragedy in Zonguldak
6 January 2013
The new process
2 January 2013
While the deep state waits…
30 December 2012
Polarization and stability
28 December 2012
The state apparatus resurfaced
26 December 2012
What is deep state?
23 December 2012
Coup changes appearance
19 December 2012
Human rights struggle in the new age
16 December 2012
As the state tries itself
14 December 2012
Search for common sense in AK Party
12 December 2012
What were in those reports?
9 December 2012
Let us make sure history does not repeat itself
7 December 2012
Turkey in past decade and past week
5 December 2012
The Kurdish issue and populism
2 December 2012
Turkey: a country of paradoxes
30 November 2012
What is Turkey’s role in the imminent comeback of the East?
28 November 2012
Why can’t we make a new constitution?
25 November 2012
Özal: Once again
23 November 2012
Where does Kenan Evren’s self-confidence come from?
21 November 2012
Gaza and three possibilities
18 November 2012
Price of delay: paid
16 November 2012
Mastering time and price of delay
14 November 2012
Death penalty debate and questions
11 November 2012
Golden Age or Stone Age?
9 November 2012
Key to a victory: politics of non-deception
7 November 2012
A radical package
4 November 2012
Özal and the Kurdish issue
2 November 2012
Changing the factory settings: thoughts on the AK Party and the Turkish Republic
31 October 2012
Continued reforms or chaos?
28 October 2012
Hunger strikes and political constriction
24 October 2012
Link between economy and democracy
21 October 2012
Murder of Christian missionaries and the deep state
19 October 2012
The importance of coup trials
...
Bloggers