Can CHP offer alternative to AKP power?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 August 2012, Sunday 1 0 0 0
ŞAHİN ALPAY
s.alpay@todayszaman.com

Can CHP offer alternative to AKP power?

The Justice and Development Party (AKP) led by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been in power in Turkey for the last 10 years, increasing its share of the national vote with every general election, to garner half of the votes cast in last year’s election.

 

But if the AKP government continues to assume Kemalist positions -- that is, if it sticks to its current pro-status quo stance and arbitrary manner -- I begin to think that it may render the Republican People’s Party (CHP) a viable alternative in the next general election, to be held in 2015. Reading and listening to what CHP leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu has said after consolidating his leadership at the recent party congress held last month, however, I realize that this is a very far-fetched prospect.

To see why this is so it is sufficient to consider what Kılıçdaroğlu has said about some of the country’s most fundamental problems in interviews given right after his recent election as uncontested party chief. He has rightly stated that the resolution of the Kurdish problem would be far more difficult if it moved beyond the limits of being a domestic issue and assumed an international character. (Akşam, July 23) But what does he propose for the resolution of the problem? He says that the four parties represented in Parliament should get together and find a solution. It appears that the main opposition CHP has no idea, no remedy of its own to tackle the issue.

It is well known that one of the broadly shared demands of Kurdish citizens is the use of the Kurdish language in education. When asked whether universities should be allowed to use Kurdish in education, Kılıçdaroğlu’s response is: “I don’t know. The language used by universities has to be an internationally recognized language. Instruction solely in Kurdish would not be of much value.” When asked whether the Kurdish language should be used in education alongside Turkish, he remarked, “The Higher Education Board [YÖK] can decide on this.” (Taraf, July 25) The main opposition party does not seem to have a clear idea of its own on this highly important issue.

Kılıçdaroğlu once spoke in support of negotiations with and an amnesty to its militants to help bring to an end the armed insurgency led by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). This is what he now says on the subject: “There is no environment for such [measures]. There can be no negotiations with a terrorist organization. In order to adopt such measures, it is necessary that terrorism stops and the PKK unconditionally lays down its arms.” (Akşam, July 23) Isn’t this exactly what the Turkish state, and with it the CHP, has been saying for nearly 30 years now?

At least half of Turkey’s largest religious minority, the Alevis, and even some CHP deputies, believe that Alevism is separate from Islam and that cemevis are places of worship separate from mosques. Kılıçdaroğlu (an Alevi himself) declares that Alevism is part of Islam and cannot be considered a separate religion! How, then, can anyone trust Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu when he says, “All citizens should be able to exercise their religious beliefs freely”?

Kılıçdaroğlu calls on the AKP government to legislate, with the support of the CHP, to revisit laws passed by the military junta in the early 1980s. But questioned as to whether the chief of General Staff of the Turkish Armed Forces should be brought under the authority of the Ministry of Defense, he declares: “We first have to know what the governing party thinks on this issue. We have not yet debated it.” How, then, can anyone trust Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu when he claims that he wants to put an end to all legislation drafted by the military?

When Kılıçdaroğlu is asked why the AKP has been able to increase its share of the vote with every election, like some opinion writers he admires in the Turkish press, he accuses voters of stupidity. He says: “Prime Minister Erdoğan promised to build a new prison in Diyarbakır and collected the votes of the people of Diyarbakır. One has to ask them why they vote for a party that promises them new prisons.” (Taraf, July 24) If Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu (a Kurd himself) still does not know why at least half of Turkey’s Kurds vote for the AKP, he needs to be reminded, perhaps by the CHP’s Kurdish deputies, that the AKP government has not only put an end to the denial of Kurdish identity but also introduced some measures to further its recognition.

Kılıçdaroğlu accuses Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu of being ignorant about the realities of the Middle East, but his words lay bare his own utter ignorance. He says: “Another state which would behave exactly like the state of Israel is taking shape. I mean a state which includes also northern Iraq.” (Hürriyet, July 26) Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu appears to want to declare war on all Kurds, while calling for a resolution of the Kurdish problem in Turkey.

It is obvious that there is actually not much that is “new” in Kılıçdaroğlu’s CHP and, as it stands, unfortunately, it is not at all likely to offer an alternative to AKP power.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
Is Assad to remain in place?
12 May 2013
When would the PKK cease to be terrorist?
5 May 2013
Why is Fethullah Gülen so influential?
28 April 2013
Turkey closer to consolidating its unity
21 April 2013
Is Islam the source of intolerance?
14 April 2013
Is Erdoğan mildly, moderately or slightly Islamist?
7 April 2013
Why is the Turkish military's political role waning?
31 March 2013
Why is it better to normalize with Israel?
24 March 2013
A major step towards Turkish-Kurdish peace
17 March 2013
Are Turkey and Israel testing normalization?
10 March 2013
The growing role of women in Turkey
3 March 2013
End the tyrannical regime in Syria
24 February 2013
‘Strategic depth' in action
17 February 2013
Need for national reconciliation
10 February 2013
What should Turkey do with the European Union?
3 February 2013
The emergence of postmodern Turkey
27 January 2013
Why love-hate with the West?
20 January 2013
Six years after Hrant Dink
13 January 2013
Religion as a force for peace
6 January 2013
Turks and Kurds have common interests
30 December 2012
Theories about Erdoğan I and II
23 December 2012
Putinism won't work in Turkey
16 December 2012
Arbil closer to İstanbul than Baghdad
14 December 2012
In memoriam: Asım Erdilek (1944-2012)
9 December 2012
A Turkish perspective on the Egyptian drama
2 December 2012
The lessons of the Greek crisis
25 November 2012
Obama surrenders to the Israel lobby
18 November 2012
Obama's choice: empire or republic
11 November 2012
Hillary Clinton: Next president of the US?
4 November 2012
Obama better for Turkey, too
28 October 2012
Neither denial nor recognition first, but cognition
21 October 2012
Freedom as the highest value in Islam
14 October 2012
Turkey needs to put its house in order
7 October 2012
Galtung solutions to Turkey's problems
30 September 2012
A radical redefinition of secularism needed
23 September 2012
The lessons of the 'Sledgehammer' verdict
16 September 2012
Turkey needs a new government
2 September 2012
Neither Islam nor Islamism is monolithic
26 August 2012
What is to be done about the PKK?
12 August 2012
What if Turkey had joined the US invasion of Iraq?
5 August 2012
Can CHP offer alternative to AKP power?
29 July 2012
Turkey and the Kurds
22 July 2012
Is Israel in good shape?
15 July 2012
Why the Turkish paradox?
8 July 2012
A fair assessment of Turkey’s foreign policy
1 July 2012
The Turkish model in the matrix of political Catholicism
24 June 2012
A Turkish view of the power struggle in Egypt
17 June 2012
A Muslim case for liberty
10 June 2012
What if the CHP becomes a truly ‘New CHP’?
3 June 2012
What's wrong with the government in Turkey?
27 May 2012
Uludere, test case for democracy in Turkey
20 May 2012
‘Positive agenda' from the EU most welcome
13 May 2012
The Olof Palme effect
6 May 2012
What's wrong with Ankara's foreign policy?
29 April 2012
Turkey and the EU: Still relevant for each other
22 April 2012
Stick to ‘zero problems’ principles
15 April 2012
‘Sectoral membership’ for Turkey in EU?
8 April 2012
Settling accounts with a brutal coup
1 April 2012
Freedom of religion far from secured in Turkey
25 March 2012
Oslo process must be revived
18 March 2012
Constitution to consolidate democracy
11 March 2012
Naked truth: Kemalism incompatible with democracy
4 March 2012
What was the ‘postmodern coup’ about?
26 February 2012
Time for Turkey and Greece to draw closer
19 February 2012
What Ankara can and cannot do for Syria
12 February 2012
Systemic gaps in government authority in Turkey
5 February 2012
What’s the problem with the media in Turkey
29 January 2012
What does the Gülen movement stand for?
22 January 2012
Is the AKP ‘Islamic Kemalist'?
15 January 2012
Time for the PKK to bury their guns in history
8 January 2012
Turkey's achievements and failures
1 January 2012
Future of the Kurdish question in Turkey
25 December 2011
What dignity and self-respect require
18 December 2011
What does Turkey as a country-state mean?
11 December 2011
Cyprus: No solution in sight
4 December 2011
Main principle for a democratic constitution
27 November 2011
Do Dersimites display the Stockholm syndrome?
20 November 2011
Lessons of the Arab Spring
30 October 2011
What’s happening in Turkish foreign policy?
23 October 2011
Killing is no solution
16 October 2011
Pangs of regime change in Egypt
9 October 2011
What's wrong with the PKK's logic?
2 October 2011
Regime change in Turkey
25 September 2011
Long live free Palestine!
18 September 2011
Invaluable asset to Arabs and West
11 September 2011
Spoiled and ungrateful
5 September 2011
Turkey moves to consolidate democracy
28 August 2011
Confessions of an ex-chief of General Staff
21 August 2011
Not nation-state, but country-state
14 August 2011
What can Turkey do for Syria?
7 August 2011
The challenge of militarism
31 July 2011
Uniculturalism breeds violence
10 July 2011
Demythologizing Atatürk
3 July 2011
Difficulties of regime change in Turkey
26 June 2011
What’s next for Turkey?
19 June 2011
An election without losers
12 June 2011
Turkey will not veer towards authoritarianism
5 June 2011
June 12 election as viewed from Diyarbakır-Amed
29 May 2011
Turkey's political topography ahead of the June 12 elections
22 May 2011
Paradox of press freedom in Turkey
...