On morality and maturity
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 26 July 2012, Thursday 1 0 0 0
NICOLE POPE
n.pope@todayszaman.com

On morality and maturity

When Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was elected mayor of İstanbul in 1994, rumors spread rapidly that alcohol would be banned and, weirdly, that brothels would be closed down. People took to the streets in pre-emptive protests. This was a period when torture was almost systematic in police stations and death squads were shooting people daily in the Southeast, often in broad daylight and with total impunity. While I sympathized to a certain extent with their concerns, I found it disturbing that the prospect of a ban on alcoholic beverages generated stronger reactions than the widespread violations of fundamental human rights.

Today, fundamental freedoms are still defended very selectively in this country. But at a time when every week seems to bring a new ban of one sort or another, the decision not to sell alcohol at the One Love Music Festival held earlier this month at Bilgi University, which was made at the last minute by the organizers, apparently under pressure from local conservative groups, inevitably becomes part of a wider picture of official interference in people’s private lives. Far from expanding individual rights and diverse lifestyles as it had promised, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government is in fact increasingly seeking to impose its own political understanding and morality on the public.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has just admitted that he personally intervened in this particular case because he believes alcoholic beverages should not be served on a university campus. “They want to turn our youths into alcoholics,” Erdoğan said. His intervention adds a new dimension to this incident. The legal age limit for drinking may differ in various countries, but implementation of existing laws should not be left to individual politicians. These days, a public statement by the prime minister, whether he expresses his dislike of a sculpture, as was the case in Kars in 2011, or his disapproval of C-sections or abortion, seems to dictate the political agenda and mobilize the bureaucracy into immediate action.

For decades, Turks suffered under the heavy hand of “devlet baba,” a harsh paternalistic state that believed it knew what was best for its citizens. Now, state and government are in the same hands, and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has chosen to become the forbidding paternal figure who dictates what is acceptable, morally and politically.

Morality, however, is a very elastic concept and so, it seems, is the age of personal responsibility. Turks are adults at 18, but they can legally marry at 17. While the prime minister last year justified implementing new rules that set at 24 the age limit for attending events where alcohol is consumed, young Turks are considered criminally responsible at the age of 12 and numerous minors have been arrested under the country’s anti-terrorism legislation.

The prime minister worries about the effect of excessive alcohol consumption on the young, but the recent appointment of a police chief accused of torturing and raping female detainees does not appear to set off moral alarm bells ringing in Ankara. The level of official outrage was also limited when it emerged that jailed teens had suffered abuse at the hands of older prisoners in Pozantı and other detention centers.

And how well does the state protect the thousands of teenage girls who, every year, are still forced into illegal marriages? Not well enough, even if awareness of the issue and of domestic violence has improved.

Melek Karaaslan, whose case has just made media headlines, died in Ağrı province at the age of 24. Only 16 when she married, she apparently succumbed to eight years of ill-treatment at the hands of her husband and in-laws. According to media reports, she was recently found, driven mentally insane by the abuse and weighing only 30 kilograms, in a small toilet where she had been locked up for three months. Her father, mindful of the family “honor” and public morality, had repeatedly returned her to her abusive husband. Her violent relatives were taken in for questioning, but they were later released, having denied wrongdoing. Her case may be extreme, but it is far from unique. She -- and others like her, married at an early age and often abused -- would have needed protection, but the authorities appear more willing to limit young people’s public freedoms than to interfere in family affairs.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 May 2013
A festering case
13 May 2013
Wrong target
9 May 2013
A heavy toll
6 May 2013
TESEV calls for security sector reforms
2 May 2013
Building bridges or drawing them?
29 April 2013
An İstanbul state of mind
25 April 2013
Europe in crisis
22 April 2013
Investing in early childhood
18 April 2013
Festering wounds
15 April 2013
Institutional violence
11 April 2013
Focus on children
8 April 2013
A confusing picture
1 April 2013
The other war
28 March 2013
The limits of solidarity
25 March 2013
Nurturing hope
21 March 2013
Work in progress
18 March 2013
UN pledge to fight violence against women
14 March 2013
Humanitarian crisis
11 March 2013
Talking peace
7 March 2013
'Enough is enough'
4 March 2013
On liberals and taking sides
28 February 2013
A heavy cost
25 February 2013
Demonstrating intent
21 February 2013
Child protection
18 February 2013
We are what we eat
14 February 2013
Yes without ‘but'
11 February 2013
Re-energizing the EU project
7 February 2013
A bygone era?
4 February 2013
A lack of determination
31 January 2013
Slower demographic expansion
28 January 2013
Failure to deliver
24 January 2013
Hate speech, hate crimes?
21 January 2013
What kind of human capital?
17 January 2013
Justice not served
14 January 2013
Combating rape
10 January 2013
Hope springs
7 January 2013
Gun control
3 January 2013
What prospects are there for change?
31 December 2012
Identities in flux
27 December 2012
A year on
24 December 2012
Global trends, local trends
20 December 2012
Monitoring education
17 December 2012
Taraf shockwaves
13 December 2012
Lost years
10 December 2012
Statistics and real lives
6 December 2012
Ruling by controversy
3 December 2012
Let’s talk about safe sex
29 November 2012
Zero tolerance?
26 November 2012
Below the surface
22 November 2012
Plenty more to be done
19 November 2012
Crisis ended, for now
12 November 2012
Disconnect
8 November 2012
Shifting demographics
5 November 2012
The world will be watching
1 November 2012
A perfect storm
29 October 2012
The great divide
22 October 2012
A gloomy picture
18 October 2012
Media, politics and women
15 October 2012
Tackling violence in the army
11 October 2012
Defending the rights of the girl child
4 October 2012
Confirming trends
1 October 2012
Animal charm
27 September 2012
Partly free
24 September 2012
Shifting power
20 September 2012
From the ground up
17 September 2012
The next education debate
13 September 2012
Journalists on trial
10 September 2012
Stop the clock!
6 September 2012
Hostile environment
3 September 2012
We are what we eat
30 August 2012
School burden
27 August 2012
No rape is legitimate
23 August 2012
After Gaziantep
16 August 2012
Déjà vu
13 August 2012
Up… and down
9 August 2012
Student rules
6 August 2012
Inside out, outside in
2 August 2012
Cause and effect
30 July 2012
Self-inflicted wounds
26 July 2012
On morality and maturity
23 July 2012
Down memory lane
19 July 2012
Olympic dreams
12 July 2012
Confusing signals
9 July 2012
Child policies under scrutiny
5 July 2012
Lightning speed
2 July 2012
Pieces of a jigsaw
28 June 2012
Selective change
25 June 2012
Handling it wrong, consistently
21 June 2012
Cycle of violence
18 June 2012
Prison tragedy
14 June 2012
Without consent
11 June 2012
Guilty until proven innocent
7 June 2012
Could do better
4 June 2012
Divide and rule
31 May 2012
Contradictions
28 May 2012
Courting controversy
24 May 2012
Shifting responsibility
21 May 2012
A hothouse atmosphere
17 May 2012
Justice delayed
14 May 2012
On the road to Çankaya
...