Lightning speed
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 July 2012, Thursday 1 0 0 0
NICOLE POPE
n.pope@todayszaman.com

Lightning speed

Six weeks: That is, by my count, the time it took for Parliament to turn into legislation the feelings expressed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on May 24, when he condemned C-sections and abortion during a speech to the women’s wing of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), unleashing a torrent of protests.

We should be thankful that the government has apparently given up the idea of making abortion illegal, though women lawfully seeking a termination may well find new obstacles in their way. On C-sections, however, Parliament has now ruled: It declared them unlawful unless warranted for medical reasons, and it managed to do so at the 11th hour, just before the National Assembly went into summer recess.

That this issue, which wasn’t on anyone’s radar until Erdoğan placed it at the center of the political agenda, was given priority over the many pressing problems facing this country says a lot about the functioning of this government. When it came to power, the AKP claimed it would put an end to a top-down approach form of governance, which party leaders linked to military tutelage. It clearly has done nothing of the sort.

According to the new rules adopted by Parliament, doctors are no longer allowed to perform cesarean sections unless required by medical circumstances. In previous articles, I pointed out that if the government, not unreasonably, felt the ratio of C-sections was too high, it could have boosted medical infrastructure and raised awareness of alternatives to encourage more women to seek a natural delivery and thus avoid an unnecessary surgical procedure.

But regulating childbirth through prohibitions that invade people’s privacy and limit their right to make their own choices is an ill-conceived idea, and one that is frankly absurd.

It also raises an interesting question: Is Turkey going to ban all unnecessary surgical procedures or only the ones that the prime minister believes might prevent Turkish families from reaching a size judged appropriate?

If you open the glossy magazines that are always left lying around in the waiting rooms of doctors, dentists or at the hairdresser, filled with photos of the rich and famous attending various functions in all their finery, you’ll see plenty of wind-tunnel faces and plumped-up lips that reveal how many members of the Turkish elite, men as well as women, resort to cosmetic surgery. Should this be prohibited, too? No medical reason underpins their decision to go under the knife, unless you consider fear of ageing a medical condition.

A few days ago, I had my eyes checked for a new prescription at one of the many Turkish eye hospitals that are attracting a growing foreign clientele. Their website advertises very attractive packages: Three nights in Istanbul plus a flight on Turkish Airlines (THY) from Europe plus corrective laser eye surgery at very competitive prices.

In fact, health tourism is a rapidly expanding sector that holds a lot of potential for Turkey’s economy. A growing number of hospitals, many of them major chains, are targeting European tourists/patients, who often combine medical treatments with a holiday in coastal resorts. While some of these patients do come for cancer treatments or heart surgeries, the vast majority of the procedures carried out on foreign visitors are elective.

Spot the contradiction here? Ban C-sections when not medically required, but encourage foreigners to undergo elective surgical procedures in Turkey to boost the country’s economy.

The most absurd aspect of the whole C-section affair, of course, is that the new ban will most likely never be strictly implemented. Health Minister Recep Akdağ has already acknowledged that “fear of childbirth” could provide justification for a C-section. From now on, more expectant mothers will express angst at the thought of delivering their babies. And they won’t even have to lie: All mothers feel a degree of trepidation ahead of giving birth. These natural concerns could easily be raised to justify bypassing a ban that shouldn’t have been introduced in the first place.

Why then alienate a large segment of the population of this country to introduce legislation that was not wanted and will probably have limited application? Perhaps because the government, facing no credible opposition, feels it can afford to impose its will because keeping the political agenda in constant flux prevents anyone from delving too deep into more serious unresolved issues and above all, because too many in this patriarchal society still approve of controlling women’s lives.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 May 2013
A festering case
13 May 2013
Wrong target
9 May 2013
A heavy toll
6 May 2013
TESEV calls for security sector reforms
2 May 2013
Building bridges or drawing them?
29 April 2013
An İstanbul state of mind
25 April 2013
Europe in crisis
22 April 2013
Investing in early childhood
18 April 2013
Festering wounds
15 April 2013
Institutional violence
11 April 2013
Focus on children
8 April 2013
A confusing picture
1 April 2013
The other war
28 March 2013
The limits of solidarity
25 March 2013
Nurturing hope
21 March 2013
Work in progress
18 March 2013
UN pledge to fight violence against women
14 March 2013
Humanitarian crisis
11 March 2013
Talking peace
7 March 2013
'Enough is enough'
4 March 2013
On liberals and taking sides
28 February 2013
A heavy cost
25 February 2013
Demonstrating intent
21 February 2013
Child protection
18 February 2013
We are what we eat
14 February 2013
Yes without ‘but'
11 February 2013
Re-energizing the EU project
7 February 2013
A bygone era?
4 February 2013
A lack of determination
31 January 2013
Slower demographic expansion
28 January 2013
Failure to deliver
24 January 2013
Hate speech, hate crimes?
21 January 2013
What kind of human capital?
17 January 2013
Justice not served
14 January 2013
Combating rape
10 January 2013
Hope springs
7 January 2013
Gun control
3 January 2013
What prospects are there for change?
31 December 2012
Identities in flux
27 December 2012
A year on
24 December 2012
Global trends, local trends
20 December 2012
Monitoring education
17 December 2012
Taraf shockwaves
13 December 2012
Lost years
10 December 2012
Statistics and real lives
6 December 2012
Ruling by controversy
3 December 2012
Let’s talk about safe sex
29 November 2012
Zero tolerance?
26 November 2012
Below the surface
22 November 2012
Plenty more to be done
19 November 2012
Crisis ended, for now
12 November 2012
Disconnect
8 November 2012
Shifting demographics
5 November 2012
The world will be watching
1 November 2012
A perfect storm
29 October 2012
The great divide
22 October 2012
A gloomy picture
18 October 2012
Media, politics and women
15 October 2012
Tackling violence in the army
11 October 2012
Defending the rights of the girl child
4 October 2012
Confirming trends
1 October 2012
Animal charm
27 September 2012
Partly free
24 September 2012
Shifting power
20 September 2012
From the ground up
17 September 2012
The next education debate
13 September 2012
Journalists on trial
10 September 2012
Stop the clock!
6 September 2012
Hostile environment
3 September 2012
We are what we eat
30 August 2012
School burden
27 August 2012
No rape is legitimate
23 August 2012
After Gaziantep
16 August 2012
Déjà vu
13 August 2012
Up… and down
9 August 2012
Student rules
6 August 2012
Inside out, outside in
2 August 2012
Cause and effect
30 July 2012
Self-inflicted wounds
26 July 2012
On morality and maturity
23 July 2012
Down memory lane
19 July 2012
Olympic dreams
12 July 2012
Confusing signals
9 July 2012
Child policies under scrutiny
5 July 2012
Lightning speed
2 July 2012
Pieces of a jigsaw
28 June 2012
Selective change
25 June 2012
Handling it wrong, consistently
21 June 2012
Cycle of violence
18 June 2012
Prison tragedy
14 June 2012
Without consent
11 June 2012
Guilty until proven innocent
7 June 2012
Could do better
4 June 2012
Divide and rule
31 May 2012
Contradictions
28 May 2012
Courting controversy
24 May 2012
Shifting responsibility
21 May 2012
A hothouse atmosphere
17 May 2012
Justice delayed
14 May 2012
On the road to Çankaya
...
Bloggers