Once there was a Garaudy
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 02 July 2012, Monday 6 0 0 0
ALİ BULAÇ
a.bulac@todayszaman.com

Once there was a Garaudy

In early 1980s, Roger Garaudy, one of the most distinguished minds of the century, announced that he had chosen Islam as his religion.

 He died last month. Garaudy was not only politically active, but also had a deeply philosophical nature and legal knowledge. As a prominent theorist of Marxist ideology, his conversion to Islam was perceived as a great event by many. It should be noted that people cannot add honor or dignity to Islam. Rather, people earn honor or dignity by becoming Muslim. To be a Muslim was to the benefit of Garaudy, and he chose the correct path as he was able to think deeply.

I had an opportunity to know him when he came to Turkey; we were together at two symposiums in İstanbul and Diyarbakır. My initial impression was of a humble person. He had deep intellectual insight; he did not show any sign of arrogance when he advocated his ideas with resolve.

Personally, I have always held certain reservations about Garaudy’s ideas. His basic thesis was one of transcendental unity suggesting all religions are in essence the same. His ideas about the historicity of Sharia, provision of Islamic jurisprudence and Islam are equally important. They are certainly open to discussion. Many unfair criticisms have been hurled against him. I must note that Garaudy was a not a mujtahid, properly equipped to utter independent rulings on Islamic jurisprudence. Yet his analysis and assessment of the problems faced by both the world and the Muslim world was deep-running. As Garaudy put it, he became Muslim for the same reason he had become a Christian and then a Marxist. Finally, he found what he was searching for.

Of course, Garaudy had both controversial and uncontroversial views. Those who opposed him did so with nationalistic motives, not by the means available to them in the authentic traditions of Islam.

Nationalism is a hard-to-cure disease. “Are we supposed to learn our religion from a French man?” exclaimed one person, who had been a Maoist for many years before converting to Islam; this individual couldn’t accept the idea that, French or not, Garaudy could provide us with inspiring ideas. I personally feel indebted to anyone who can teach me something. I do not have an inferiority complex in this regard. If any person has anything I can learn, I try to learn it without being distracted by his or her ethnic or national identity. Imam al-Ghazali says there are two things that prevent one from learning new things: shyness and pride. Both lead to ignorance and hardheartedness. Many Muslim leaders and authors have tended to build insurmountable walls between themselves and everyone else as they have failed to keep their carnal selves in check and overcome their arrogance. Yet the most basic injunction of religion is to combat our carnal selves, which are controlled by Satan. Modesty is a Muslim’s decoration.

Just as we can learn something about Islam from an Easterner, we can do the same from a Westerner. There is no rule or implication that Islam can be taught only by people from the Middle East or from a historically Muslim nation. To argue otherwise is to kindle a “Muslim nation prejudice.” “To God belong the East and the West” (Baqara: 2/115). Let us not forget that prejudice may rebound on our own nation or on our national borders, creating the paranoid thought that “no one knows Islam better than us.” Indeed, we have seen many people in this country who would say: “Are we supposed to learn Islam from Arabs or non-Arabs? Who are Sayyid Qutb, Abul A’la Maududi or Ali Shariati to teach us Islam?” French Muslims like Garaudy or René Guénon who seriously criticize the modern world should not go unnoticed.

Everyone, except prophets, is prone to err; so Garaudy’s views are open to criticism. Yet we should not approach this with a “Muslim nation or Middle Eastern arrogance.” A well-justified criticism may be rendered void by an unfair motive.

According to his last wishes, Garaudy’s corpse was incinerated. In my opinion, his last wishes did not have to be complied with as they did not comply with Islam’s principles. Indeed, Islam tells us to maintain the integrity of a corpse, wash it, shroud it and bury it in soil, except in the case of war, accident or other unavoidable circumstances. Still, this practice does not make Garaudy non-Muslim. May God have mercy on him.

COMMENTS
@proppen: Mr. Bulac s very good in providing propaganda but lacks the skills of writing a normal column. Besides that, he thinks that the readers here, mainly foreigners, are the same educated as his bras. We spent once a lecture about Garaudy...the guy is simple a dummy...perfectly fitting in Musl...
Johan
Just because Jordanian Intellectuals thought him important and a former Syrian vice-president AbdulHamil Khaddam and also Gaddafi said he was the greatest contemporary Western philosopher, this does not make it so. None of the above have made any significant philosophical contributions of their own,...
Shaun
Mr Bulac, you and I know that your beloved friends are in no way less chauvinistic than "ex-Maoist" IÖ, yet you were very protective of them last year when there was a debate on that.
Ferhat B
I think the article has missed some rather important pieces of information about Mr Garaudy, so I filled in the gap below. In 1996 Garaudy published his controversial work, Les Mythes fondateurs de la politique israelienne, later translated into English as The Founding Myths of Modern Israel. B...
Proppen
What message or point did the author want to make with this piece? I did not see a clear structure nor any issue he want me to remember after reading it.
Sugman
Please don't mix since with your weird thoughts about religion. Backwardness is the core of political Islam as Garaudy simple stated it. 1400 years of a parasitic civilization must do the math now, even for you Sr.
Johan
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
10 June 2013
The real problem is deep down
3 June 2013
A new approach
27 May 2013
Does secularization modernize societies? (2)
21 May 2013
Does secularization modernize societies? (1)
13 May 2013
If the world is not possible, then man isn't either!
6 May 2013
Testing liberal theory in practice
29 April 2013
Moral marginals
22 April 2013
Demanding rights!
15 April 2013
Authentic pluralism
8 April 2013
Higher reference
1 April 2013
Is democracy a sword of Damocles?
25 March 2013
Ways of cancelling the will of the majority
18 March 2013
Liberal contradiction
11 March 2013
What does democracy offer religion?
4 March 2013
Changing criteria for Muslims
25 February 2013
Who is testing whom?
18 February 2013
The democracy test
11 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (2)
4 February 2013
A comparison between mosques and churches (1)
28 January 2013
Is non-Western modernization possible?
21 January 2013
Modernization, Westernization and secularism (1)
14 January 2013
Can religion be separated from life?
7 January 2013
Burning in fire of dissension sparked by unprincipled people
31 December 2012
Escape from chaos
24 December 2012
Lumpenization of bedouins
17 December 2012
Turkey’s Islam
10 December 2012
Reasons not to trust the EU
3 December 2012
Genius and taqwa
26 November 2012
What is ‘national’?
19 November 2012
UN must be restructured
12 November 2012
The world in the new era
5 November 2012
What about hunger strikes?
29 October 2012
What are we sacrificing?
22 October 2012
Turkish model
15 October 2012
Three models of Islam
8 October 2012
New political culture
1 October 2012
The way we perceive problems (2)
24 September 2012
The way we perceive problems (1)
17 September 2012
Global conspiracy
10 September 2012
A way out
3 September 2012
Religion in the name of what?
27 August 2012
Europe’s conscience
13 August 2012
Prayer
6 August 2012
Culture
30 July 2012
Society
23 July 2012
Tragedy of intellectuals
16 July 2012
Soroush’s fallacy
9 July 2012
Return to reason
2 July 2012
Once there was a Garaudy
25 June 2012
Founding actors of the region
18 June 2012
Some day, the West will realize
11 June 2012
Change of political name
4 June 2012
Search for a new model
28 May 2012
Islam is like a river
21 May 2012
What are the media? What do they do?
14 May 2012
Does anybody really know?
7 May 2012
On the army
30 April 2012
The political destiny of the Middle East
23 April 2012
The Middle East: tribe, spoils and faith
19 April 2012
Reading change (2)
16 April 2012
Reading change (1)
9 April 2012
Pluralism within Islam
5 April 2012
A single standard
2 April 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (2)
29 March 2012
Religion and politics in Turkey (1)
26 March 2012
A new authority
26 March 2012
A new authority
22 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (2)
19 March 2012
Philosophy of reforms (1)
15 March 2012
Handling the modernity crisis
12 March 2012
Democratization of education
8 March 2012
What is wisdom and purpose?
5 March 2012
Finding what we have lost
1 March 2012
Those who migrate, those who force others to migrate
27 February 2012
A challenging solution for Syria
24 February 2012
From Alparslan to Salahuddin!
16 February 2012
How does Iran get stronger?
13 February 2012
The state on target: Iran
9 February 2012
Sunni-Shiite-secular
6 February 2012
Wars of religion
2 February 2012
Sectarian wars
30 January 2012
The ‘other’ and our need to be ‘threatened’
26 January 2012
Salvation, not welfare
23 January 2012
Modern meaning of history
19 January 2012
Rational basis of religious violence
16 January 2012
Righteous reason and a pure disposition
12 January 2012
Enlightenment, Islam and intellect
9 January 2012
Controversy within Europe
5 January 2012
Could Christianity transform?
2 January 2012
Return to Christianity
29 December 2011
Reminding Europe of its identity
26 December 2011
Social gender
22 December 2011
NATO and Afghanistan
15 December 2011
Cause of the problem
12 December 2011
Two steps forward, one step back
8 December 2011
Thought crime
5 December 2011
Point of reference for our rights and freedoms
1 December 2011
Mistakes in Syria
28 November 2011
Concerns over Syria
24 November 2011
The single article of the Constitution
...
Bloggers