Gül to return to politics on his own terms
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
18 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 June 2012, Wednesday 1 0 0 0
LALE KEMAL
loglu@todayszaman.com

Gül to return to politics on his own terms

Though there are another two years before the Turkish presidential race kicks off, a recent court decision has stirred a debate over who will stand for this top post. The reason for this early debate stems from curiosity over whether two good, old friends -- Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and President Abdullah Gül -- will engage in a fierce competition for the position.

Erdoğan is considered a potential candidate for the presidency even if he has not yet openly declared an intention to run. However, it is not expected that Gül will run for the position if Erdoğan declares his intention to do so. It is highly possible that Gül will then return to politics in order to become prime minister. Yet this most likely scenario is not going to be easily or smoothly implemented as there would be a fierce debate within the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) over the prime ministerial position while other political parties attempt to change the scenario in their favor.

The Constitutional Court rejected on Friday an appeal filed by the main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP) requesting the annulment of a law dating 2007 setting the presidential term for Gül at seven years. The law had been passed in Parliament, thanks to the AK Party's majority of votes, in the same year Gül became president. The court also annulled part of the law that barred Gül from running for another term, saying it is unconstitutional to limit his rights. Therefore, pursuant to the court's decision, Gül will serve seven years in office, ending in 2014, and can then run for another term for five years.

Leading AK Party members, such as Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdağ, who were among the architects of the earlier law to limit Gül's term to seven years in order to pave the way for Erdoğan to stand in the presidential election criticized the Constitutional Court's ruling that Gül can run for another five years. The fact that several influential names within the AK Party, which Gül played a significant role in creating, took up an attitude against him on the issue of the presidential election by adopting this law hurt Gül deeply, say his close associates.

Gül is not upset that his term has been limited to seven years but rather is uneasy that his name is being used in the presidential election issue by certain party members. Furthermore, Gül is suspected to be upset because Erdoğan, a close friend he encouraged to join the AK Party while Erdoğan was still the mayor of İstanbul, has not stopped senior party members from being vocal against Gül or from targeting him by openly criticizing the court decision that paves the way for Gül to stand for another five years after his term expires in 2014.

However, nobody expects the two old friends to compete in the presidential race. Gül will withdraw his candidacy for the presidency for another five years in 2014 if Erdoğan declares his candidacy. But there is one hurdle that could keep this most probable scenario from happening, and it is the uncertainty over Erdoğan's health by then. After two intestinal operations prompted months-long speculation that he was gravely ill and had cancer, which Erdoğan denied, this powerful Turkish prime minister has been doing quite well and returned to his extremely active political life. Still, intestinal diseases carry a risk of leading to cancer. It is not a desirable outcome for Erdoğan to become seriously ill and thereby be prevented from active engagement in politics or standing for the presidency. But if this worse case scenario takes place, Gül will definitely declare his candidacy for the presidency in 2014 to run for another five years.

What kind of strategy will Gül pursue if he withdraws from the presidential race in favor of Erdoğan? He will most probably return to politics and seek to become prime minister. This would not be an easy undertaking considering the much-expected fierce battle to take place within the party for the prime ministerial position. Additionally, someone like Erdoğan, who would like to continue asserting power over the party even if he becomes president, would not get along well with a prime minister like Gül, who would not allow anyone to dictate his policies for the executive that he would head.

Nevertheless, for Gül to become prime minister in 2014, he would have to be elected as a deputy. General elections are scheduled to take place in 2015 if an early election is not called. In this case, Gül would be expected to wait a year and then stand with an AK Party ticket to become a deputy. Returning to politics by public support in 2015 would strengthen Gül's hand in becoming prime minister, say well-informed sources. Between 2014 and the general elections in 2015, an AK Party deputy to whom President Erdoğan could dictate policy could be prime minister, according to scenarios being discussed in Ankara.

In the final analysis, Gül appears to be the best choice for prime minister if Erdoğan becomes president because he is renowned for his democratic stance. As a veteran politician, he also has the potential to prevent a serious division that may occur within the AK Party, which is in power for its third term following last year's general elections.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
15 May 2013
Will the Syrian tragedy be Turkey's, too?
13 May 2013
Who will benefit from shortened military service?
8 May 2013
What will be the next move?
6 May 2013
Turkey's mishandling of the JSF
1 May 2013
Bureaucratic war over democratic oversight
29 April 2013
Presidential system and authoritarianism
24 April 2013
Erdoğan will obtain presidential powers
22 April 2013
Peace process and reduction of military power
17 April 2013
Turkish-Israeli military ties will not resume soon
15 April 2013
Al-Nusra's growing influence prompts frequent Turkey visits by Kerry
10 April 2013
Military-government covert deal doomed to fail
8 April 2013
National strategy lacking in Turkish peace process
3 April 2013
Why this stubbornness to kill transparency?
1 April 2013
Government push for unrealistic demands risks peace process
27 March 2013
Military response to solution process is an open question
25 March 2013
Turkish-Israeli reconciliation to help thwart regional threats
20 March 2013
PKK disarmament will come later
18 March 2013
Shortcomings in judicial reform to slow peace process
13 March 2013
Favoritism poisons ethical values in Turkey
11 March 2013
Peace process and presidential system
6 March 2013
PKK's European wing weighs in on peace process
4 March 2013
Where does the military stand in the peace process?
27 February 2013
Achieving peace also requires open debate on state mistakes
25 February 2013
Uludere and making peace
20 February 2013
Decentralization is critical in Kurdish peace process
18 February 2013
Alternative to current peace process is catastrophe
13 February 2013
Turkish military's morale from a historic perspective (2)
11 February 2013
Turkish military's morale from a historic perspective (1)
6 February 2013
Is Turkey seeking to revive pan-Turkism?
4 February 2013
Turkish-US conflicts are at tactical level
30 January 2013
Society necessitates the emergence of a new democratic movement
28 January 2013
In a radical move, Turkey opts for co-development of long-range missiles
23 January 2013
US delivers democracy message to Turkey
21 January 2013
Kurdish issue haunts CHP
15 January 2013
What will happen if China suffers from famine?
9 January 2013
'I can make everything' policy will weaken defense industry
7 January 2013
Yet another process to beat terror
2 January 2013
Getting rid of a state of siege mood
31 December 2012
Beginning new year with good news for transparency
28 December 2012
Invitation crisis implicates PM
26 December 2012
Grave violation of soldier rights
24 December 2012
Turkey's unclear direction raises concerns
20 December 2012
Russia should cooperate if it wants to protect post-Assad interests in Syria
17 December 2012
Why was Taraf important?
13 December 2012
Why has the Turkish commander received a medal?
10 December 2012
Why didn't Russia ask for the return of seized military equipment from Turkey?
5 December 2012
Immunity debate demonstrates Turkey's Kurdish deadlock
3 December 2012
Scrutiny over defense industry activities
26 November 2012
Turkish nationalism prone to exploitation
21 November 2012
Turkish Parliament surprised me
19 November 2012
End of hunger strikes may revive peace talks
14 November 2012
Is Turkey seeking a 19th-century constitutional monarchy?
12 November 2012
In Turkey causes of incidents are left in the dark
7 November 2012
Göktürk satellite project recalls reform in defense industry
5 November 2012
Hunger strike opens a new page in Kurdish question
1 November 2012
Curiosity surrounds Babacan's replacement
29 October 2012
Turkey's security-centric approach and its repercussions
24 October 2012
Turkey's choice: modernity over democracy
22 October 2012
Erdoğan is hedging his bets
17 October 2012
Turkey should not criticize, it is doing poorly
15 October 2012
Turkey should make efforts to diffuse tension with Syria
11 October 2012
Transparency will beat corruption
9 October 2012
Civilian protection and state transparency
3 October 2012
Nations run out of ideas on Syria as FSA runs out of ammunition
1 October 2012
Another Oslo cannot come out from this speech
26 September 2012
New party scenarios are discussed in Ankara
24 September 2012
Future coups or coup plans will freeze Turkey's NATO membership
19 September 2012
War to gain psychological superiority
17 September 2012
Dealing with arms in post-Assad period
12 September 2012
One step forward, two steps back
10 September 2012
Transparency and accountability are key for democracy
29 August 2012
Alarm bells do not ring despite danger on its way
27 August 2012
Returning to normalcy
22 August 2012
A nation that can't finish the war
15 August 2012
Why media becomes vulnerable
13 August 2012
Turkey's gamble on Syria
8 August 2012
Rethinking Kurdish question as Burkay talks
6 August 2012
What is YAŞ?
1 August 2012
Between paranoia and reality
30 July 2012
Indifference to police misconduct
26 July 2012
Critical questions not asked in F-4 downing
23 July 2012
Turkey’s difficult times as Syrian conflict intensifies
18 July 2012
Is the CHP the same old story, same old song?
16 July 2012
Turkey played all cards in Syrian conflict
11 July 2012
Transparency will shed light on jet downing
9 July 2012
Helping Kurds explore avenues other than guns
4 July 2012
Turkish media deceives public over strength of locally developed arms
2 July 2012
Government is taken hostage by Huntington’s theory
20 June 2012
Gül to return to politics on his own terms
18 June 2012
Turkey should beat fear to thwart extreme Kurdish demands
13 June 2012
AK Party faces risk of losing popular support
11 June 2012
Restrictions on human rights poison positive Turkish climate
6 June 2012
‘New CHP’ undergoes critical test on Kurdish issue
4 June 2012
Why is Turkey in reform fatigue?
30 May 2012
I liked the AK Party because it was reformist
28 May 2012
Turkey presses for arms but not a Kurdish solution
23 May 2012
Who is in the driver’s seat in Turkey?
21 May 2012
Carelessness in target selection results in killing of 34 civilians
16 May 2012
State of Turkish media is hopeless
14 May 2012
Turkey, EU agree to avert political crisis in relations
...