Divide and rule
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 04 June 2012, Monday 2 0 0 0
NICOLE POPE
n.pope@todayszaman.com

Divide and rule

The abortion debate shows no sign of abating as women take to the streets in their thousands around the country to protest a proposed change in the legislation that will severely restrict, if not ban, the termination of an unwanted pregnancy.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan needed a new controversy to distract popular attention from the Uludere fiasco and it appears he has been successful, at least in part. His confrontational ruling style, however, will have a long-term impact on society. The AK Party has often be praised for the stability it has brought to Turkey over the past decade, but under the veneer of political continuity, social fractures have been getting deeper in recent times as the government turned more authoritarian.

On the gender front, the government has improved the legislative framework first with the Civil Code of 2002, then with the Turkish Penal Code (TCK) introduced in 2005, which radically changed legal perceptions of women and more recently with the Law on the Protection of the Family, aimed at curbing domestic violence. But at the same time, a more conservative view of the role played by women in the society has gradually crept in.

Anyone has the right to oppose abortion, but the level of misogyny expressed by politicians defending a ban in recent days is disturbing. It demonstrates a lack of respect for women as individuals that does not bode well for the improvement of gender relations in this country.

Statements on the fate of women left pregnant after a rape were particularly shocking. Mere embryos, however they are conceived, suddenly seem to have more rights than the women themselves. Ankara Mayor Melih Gökçek went as far as suggesting that women who get pregnant after a rape should kill themselves rather than hurt an “innocent” child. Rape victims, clearly, are not innocent in his eyes. His attitude only underlines why women in this unfortunate situation would choose a termination: They would forever be stigmatized by a society that sees all women as potentially guilty of violating the community’s honor, and so would their offspring.

It is worth remembering that even without human intervention, 15-20 percent of detected pregnancies end in spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. Some experts place this figure at up to 50 percent because many embryos are naturally terminated before their existence is even detected. At 10 weeks of gestation, the time limit currently imposed by Turkish law, the tiny embryo is only just turning into a fetus. It is a potential baby, but it isn’t one yet.

The male politicians who launch such ferocious verbal attacks against women talk with great emotion about the children and souls potentially lost. But we never hear them react so strongly to the steady flow of news about women killed by their partners, nor do they have much to say when teenage girls are raped by large groups of men, often involving notables from the community. In the latest such story to emerge, two policemen were among 17 people involved in the sexual abuse of a 14-year-old in Sakarya. The trauma suffered by the victims of such assaults never attracts as much political attention as unborn embryos have done in recent days.

What women demand is the right to choose and to have control over their bodies. It is not for the state to dictate how many children a woman should bear or in what circumstances. The prime minister’s statements suggest, however, that he views women primarily as instruments of his grand design to expand the Turkish population. He is clearly unaware of the daily hardship experienced by many of his female compatriots. Women who choose to terminate a pregnancy always do so as a last resort: Abortion is an invasive procedure that no one would turn to unnecessarily.

The head of the Religious Affairs Directorate has now weighed into the debate and expressed support for Prime Minister Erdoğan’s view that abortion is murder. But this is a fight Turkish women won’t give up easily and more tension can be expected in the coming weeks.

Abortion was not a hot topic of debate in Turkish society until Prime Minister Erdoğan chose to bring it onto the agenda. He may get the legislative change he wants, but he has also unnecessarily increased tension in the country and created yet another fault line in an increasingly polarized and divided Turkey.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 May 2013
A festering case
13 May 2013
Wrong target
9 May 2013
A heavy toll
6 May 2013
TESEV calls for security sector reforms
2 May 2013
Building bridges or drawing them?
29 April 2013
An İstanbul state of mind
25 April 2013
Europe in crisis
22 April 2013
Investing in early childhood
18 April 2013
Festering wounds
15 April 2013
Institutional violence
11 April 2013
Focus on children
8 April 2013
A confusing picture
1 April 2013
The other war
28 March 2013
The limits of solidarity
25 March 2013
Nurturing hope
21 March 2013
Work in progress
18 March 2013
UN pledge to fight violence against women
14 March 2013
Humanitarian crisis
11 March 2013
Talking peace
7 March 2013
'Enough is enough'
4 March 2013
On liberals and taking sides
28 February 2013
A heavy cost
25 February 2013
Demonstrating intent
21 February 2013
Child protection
18 February 2013
We are what we eat
14 February 2013
Yes without ‘but'
11 February 2013
Re-energizing the EU project
7 February 2013
A bygone era?
4 February 2013
A lack of determination
31 January 2013
Slower demographic expansion
28 January 2013
Failure to deliver
24 January 2013
Hate speech, hate crimes?
21 January 2013
What kind of human capital?
17 January 2013
Justice not served
14 January 2013
Combating rape
10 January 2013
Hope springs
7 January 2013
Gun control
3 January 2013
What prospects are there for change?
31 December 2012
Identities in flux
27 December 2012
A year on
24 December 2012
Global trends, local trends
20 December 2012
Monitoring education
17 December 2012
Taraf shockwaves
13 December 2012
Lost years
10 December 2012
Statistics and real lives
6 December 2012
Ruling by controversy
3 December 2012
Let’s talk about safe sex
29 November 2012
Zero tolerance?
26 November 2012
Below the surface
22 November 2012
Plenty more to be done
19 November 2012
Crisis ended, for now
12 November 2012
Disconnect
8 November 2012
Shifting demographics
5 November 2012
The world will be watching
1 November 2012
A perfect storm
29 October 2012
The great divide
22 October 2012
A gloomy picture
18 October 2012
Media, politics and women
15 October 2012
Tackling violence in the army
11 October 2012
Defending the rights of the girl child
4 October 2012
Confirming trends
1 October 2012
Animal charm
27 September 2012
Partly free
24 September 2012
Shifting power
20 September 2012
From the ground up
17 September 2012
The next education debate
13 September 2012
Journalists on trial
10 September 2012
Stop the clock!
6 September 2012
Hostile environment
3 September 2012
We are what we eat
30 August 2012
School burden
27 August 2012
No rape is legitimate
23 August 2012
After Gaziantep
16 August 2012
Déjà vu
13 August 2012
Up… and down
9 August 2012
Student rules
6 August 2012
Inside out, outside in
2 August 2012
Cause and effect
30 July 2012
Self-inflicted wounds
26 July 2012
On morality and maturity
23 July 2012
Down memory lane
19 July 2012
Olympic dreams
12 July 2012
Confusing signals
9 July 2012
Child policies under scrutiny
5 July 2012
Lightning speed
2 July 2012
Pieces of a jigsaw
28 June 2012
Selective change
25 June 2012
Handling it wrong, consistently
21 June 2012
Cycle of violence
18 June 2012
Prison tragedy
14 June 2012
Without consent
11 June 2012
Guilty until proven innocent
7 June 2012
Could do better
4 June 2012
Divide and rule
31 May 2012
Contradictions
28 May 2012
Courting controversy
24 May 2012
Shifting responsibility
21 May 2012
A hothouse atmosphere
17 May 2012
Justice delayed
14 May 2012
On the road to Çankaya
...