The new AKP
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 01 June 2012, Friday 6 0 0 0
EMRE USLU
e.uslu@todayszaman.com

The new AKP

In my previous piece for Today’s Zaman (May 30, 2012), I underlined a number of points to show that the Justice and Development Party (AKP) has become a conservative party. It is no longer a progressive party that brings major reforms to the country. Thus, it would not be a mistake to define the AKP as the “new AKP.”

The major components of the new AKP are as follows. First, the AKP has turned into a conservative party that promotes a typical conservative agenda, the major points of which I outlined in my previous article. Second, the AKP has turned into an elitist party that has created a hardcore elite group, and the party now mainly serves the interests of this AKP elite. Third, while the AKP used to be the party of periphery, it now is the party of the political center. Fourth, party leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was a popular leader who has become a populist leader.

The AKP has become an elitist party that has created its own elite and either excludes the “other” from the core of the party, government and state or allows those who show absolute obedience to the party to survive near AKP circles. The foundation of the AKP elites is made up of the old Milli Görüş (national outlook) networks, which have three major branches: the Malatyalılar group, the Beşir Atalay School and the Ahmet Davutoğlu School. The Malatyalılar group within the party is a group that was founded by Selahattin Çekmegil and his followers, who reject novelties in Islamic tradition and try to establish a middle-road approach between the thousands of years of madhhab’s (Islamic schools of thought). This group is a small group within the party, but it has an intellectual influence.

The Beşir Atalay group is a group that is sympathetic towards Iran and comes mainly coming from the universities. This group is particularly exclusivist, thinking they are the backbone of the AKP, and thus believe AKP policies should serve their interests. This group does not want to see any person of a different affiliation in a critical position within the bureaucracy, at universities or even within the party. One may consider this group to largely promote localization and isolation. It carries anti-Western sentiments at its core and promotes Easternism. It wants to use the government and its resources to expand its influence as a network.

The Davutoğlu group is the most open-minded group within the core of the AKP, and most members of which have received some form of education at Western universities, thereby enabling them to communicate with the West. The Davutoğlu group has always taken a strategic approach, changing its position and policies according to the circumstances. Their influence is especially visible in Turkey’s foreign policy-making and security analyses.

Although this group also has its own agenda to occupy the center of party, keeping the others away, one could not argue there is obvious competition between the groups I have mentioned above. All of these groups, however, are for now united in keeping the outsiders away from the party and bureaucracy.

When it come to preparing party policies, these groups work hard on preparing reports and various projects for the government to implement. Within the last year, almost all proposals that have come from these groups have one agenda: using government sources and findings to expand their own influence over society and to establish a worldwide religious/conservative network.

Given the facts that the AKP no longer operates in a partnership with the liberal segments of society, no longer promotes a progressive agenda, is no longer an inclusive party, has created its own elite and tries to first serve the interests of these elites, one could easily argue that the AKP is an elitist party that is slowly turning into a religious/conservative replica of the old Kemalist parties.

This issue itself is good enough to make the argument there is a “new AKP.” I will analyze in my coming articles other points that make the AKP a “new party.”

COMMENTS
Selahattin Çekmegil. This is a wrong name. It must be SELAMI ÇEKMEGİL. The family of Çekmegil is famous both in Malatya and certain Islamic circles. Malatyalılar ve the Çekmegil Group have particularities of their own.
Numan Sarıgül
Who is Selahattin Cekmegil? First time heard of him. Either author should provide evidence or we should now on read Emre Uslu's pieces as they are just cheap manipulation.
ahmet demir
I think this is AKP which are not change , but some time they shows this their face.
METE
It's not a "new AKP" because these are the exact same people. It is only that their masks are off and you and other liberals are finally willing to accept that Mr. Erdogan is not the liberal, democratic leader that you imagined but rather is aspiring to establish a Putin-like "democratic" regime in ...
Yavuz
You catch on; but slowly. Anyway, better late than wrong.
at last
Turkey has a bunch of religious zealots leading the government. That they don't have beards and wear $ 1000 european suits doesn't make them any less ardent. They intend to turn Turkey away from the west and towards the Islamic middle east. The military has been disempowered so it couldn't stand as ...
Yaacov
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
What did Erdoğan gain from Washington?
17 May 2013
Can we Turkify Turkish intelligence?
15 May 2013
Security weakness
10 May 2013
Why is the CHP so important for the AKP?
8 May 2013
Time for urban battle in Kurdish cities
5 May 2013
Is the MHP on the rise?
3 May 2013
Will Turkey agree to international intervention in Syria?
1 May 2013
The coming election period and the settlement process
26 April 2013
What did Karayılan ask?
24 April 2013
The PKK's new strategy: acts of civil disobedience
21 April 2013
Kurdish nationalism on the rise
19 April 2013
Freedom of Press in Turkey
17 April 2013
Skeptics and optimists
12 April 2013
Hizbullah-PKK clashes
10 April 2013
Plan B for peace
7 April 2013
Questions for wise men committee
5 April 2013
The role of the wise-man committee
3 April 2013
New moves in the solution process
31 March 2013
Finding solutions (2)
29 March 2013
Finding solutions
24 March 2013
How is peace with the PKK being made?
22 March 2013
What is in Öcalan's message
20 March 2013
Ergenekon's bomb message
17 March 2013
Something fishy going on?
15 March 2013
The Turkish flag at Nevruz celebrations?
13 March 2013
Let PKK hostages be ambassadors for peace
10 March 2013
Who will lose?
8 March 2013
Why is Erdoğan so furious?
6 March 2013
Why were the İmralı minutes leaked?
3 March 2013
Abdullah Öcalan: ‘a man of peace'
1 March 2013
MİT targets us
27 February 2013
Erdoğan and Öcalan took the right steps, but...
24 February 2013
What to make of the visit to Öcalan?
22 February 2013
What is happening in the CHP?
20 February 2013
The BDP's Black Sea trip and the violent protests
17 February 2013
Would the PKK suicide attack again?
15 February 2013
Erdoğan's new friends: generals
13 February 2013
Where is the solution process heading?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new enemy: the EU
6 February 2013
An open letter to the American ambassador to Turkey
3 February 2013
Causes behind DHKP/C shock among diplomats
1 February 2013
Paris killings' impact on negotiation process
30 January 2013
Ömer Güney was a courier
27 January 2013
Erdoğan considering Shanghai Five
25 January 2013
Is the PKK exhausted?
23 January 2013
Forecasting politics in 2013
20 January 2013
Abdullah Öcalan benefits from peace process
18 January 2013
Discussing the peace process
16 January 2013
Would the PKK agree with the government?
13 January 2013
Killing in Paris
9 January 2013
Sledgehammer verdicts: Professor Rodrik 'deserves' Nobel Prize
6 January 2013
PKK perspective on laying down arms
2 January 2013
Can the PKK lay down its arms?
30 December 2012
Yet again Öcalan-MİT meeting
28 December 2012
Disgusting
23 December 2012
The Patriot missiles and politics
21 December 2012
Bülent Arınç and the Kurdish portfolio
19 December 2012
Kurdish politics without Talabani
16 December 2012
Taraf, democracy and freedom of the press
14 December 2012
Washington, Syria and al-Qaeda
12 December 2012
Give that medal to Öcalan and the Oslo trumpeters!
7 December 2012
A Kurdish faction within the AKP?
5 December 2012
Bring EU process back to Turkish politics
2 December 2012
Putin's visit: What to do with him?
25 November 2012
The return of Erdoğan?
23 November 2012
Kenan Evren's confession and the Sledgehammer coup
21 November 2012
Hunger strike act: the return of Abdullah Öcalan
18 November 2012
Is Turkish-Kurdish peace on the horizon?
16 November 2012
Déjà vu
14 November 2012
Erdoğan’s way
11 November 2012
Was the chopper crash in Siirt an accident or a conspiracy?
9 November 2012
How does Öcalan think? What does he want?
7 November 2012
Obama: a Thanksgiving gift to the world
4 November 2012
PKK is winning
2 November 2012
Who recorded the Oslo meetings?
31 October 2012
Is Öcalan the right actor to solve the Kurdish problem?
28 October 2012
The Öcalan theater
24 October 2012
A storm looming after Eid
21 October 2012
Erdoğan's grave mistake
17 October 2012
The state was on the verge of shelling its own people
14 October 2012
Erdoğan's fear
10 October 2012
Political implications of Diyarbakır police chief’s statements
8 October 2012
AKP’s election strategy: 50 percent threshold
5 October 2012
What is wrong with our Syrian policy?
30 September 2012
10 years in power: the AKP as ‘perception changer'
28 September 2012
‘Peace' season has arrived once more
26 September 2012
The untold tragedies of PKK parents
23 September 2012
After the Sledgehammer trial: the defendants' strategy
20 September 2012
Where is Turkey heading?
16 September 2012
Innocence of Turks, thanks to the Ergenekon investigation
14 September 2012
Kurdish nationalists' perception of PKK violence
12 September 2012
Time to discuss a Kurdish curriculum
9 September 2012
Would a ‘wise man committee' work against the PKK?
7 September 2012
Operation against Taraf on three levels
5 September 2012
What should the AKP do against the PKK’s strategy?
2 September 2012
Turkey-Iran cold war
31 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK (3): intelligence
29 August 2012
Turkey’s mistakes against the PKK (2): lack of understanding of PKK strategy
26 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK: bureaucrat rotation and YAŞ meeting
24 August 2012
Can the PKK achieve its goal?
...