Turkey and hidden fanaticisms
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
22 May 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 May 2012, Sunday 7 0 0 0
EMRE USLU
e.uslu@todayszaman.com

Turkey and hidden fanaticisms

Recent nonsensical arguments that the Gülen movement wants to control the Fenerbahçe football club and its political and social effect on Fenerbahçe fans once again proved that Turkey is not a country of rational people.

Now, even under the pressure of Fenerbahçe and perhaps for political reasons, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Turkish Football Federation's (TFF) Professional Football Discipline Committee (PFDK) has admitted that Fenerbahçe executives committed the crime of match fixing. The evidence in the court file is so obvious that even the TFF, which was selected to cover the stinking truth about Fenerbahçe and other football clubs' involvement in the match-fixing crime, had to admit that such things took place.

What would rational people, even football fans, do under these circumstances? Question the club executives why they did this, right? In Turkey, even well-known journalists forgot about their names and reputations, forgot about the facts and have created a fictitious world, which they've started to believe in. The Gülen movement wants to control the Fenerbahçe football club. No one question why this movement would want to control this club and make other club fans its adversaries. No one questions what the benefit to the Gülen movement would be if it tries to control the Fenerbahçe club.

That is why I claim that Turkey is not a country of rational people. Rather, it is a country of fanatics -- people who believe in one thing and never question their beliefs.

One can list the areas of fanaticism in Turkey: football, politics, religion and nationalism.

For football, the Fenerbahçe incident has proven that even the most rational of people can lose their mind enough to believe fiction instead of looking at the facts. The fact is that Fenerbahçe President Aziz Yıldırım even admitted himself a number of times that the championships in Turkey cannot be earned on football fields but can only be fixed behind closed doors. Finally, a prosecutor has investigated the match-fixing allegations and proved that the Fenerbahçe president is right. Indeed, Fenerbahçe won its championship title through “usual methods” that other teams also resort to. Now the question those Fenerbahçe fanatics ask is: Why do you punish only Fenerbahçe and not other teams? The answer is simple: Because there was only one “champion” last year. I am sure if it were Galatasaray, the prosecutor would have investigated how Galatasaray become champion.

In politics, throughout the 1970s, Turkey was a country in crisis because of fanaticism in politics. Turkish society was literally divided into two camps: leftist and rightist, which constantly clashed with one another. Thus, we faced military coups, and many crises to end fanaticisms. In the 1990s, Turkish society finally left the fanaticisms aside but this time became an apolitical society that does not care about what politicians do.

Since the 2000s we have a new generation of political fanatics, the fanatics of Erdoğan. For Erdoğan and the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) it is good to have such people who really believe in him and his party; however, it is not good for Turkey because with this much power, no one questions Erdoğan's way of governance. For a healthy democracy and for the future of the country, such fanaticism is not good.

For nationalism, there is no doubt that the ethnic nationalism is dying around the world, but in Turkey people are still dying and killing for their national identity. Turkey now has clashes between Kurdish nationalists and Turkish nationalists. It seems that the fanaticism in nationalism never ends.

As for religion, it is claimed that Turkey is a moderate country that people live in peace and no one interferes in the religious affairs of others. Yet the facts on the ground are obvious. The government of this country, despite the fact that it declared it would open Christian monasteries, could not open them because of religious and nationalist resistance. Permanent religious leaders have openly supported that Turkey should open those monasteries, but because of the fear of public relations in politics, politicians recalculate their decisions.

All in all, in a normal day you could not see any fanaticism in Turkey but the Fenerbahçe incident once again showed that Turkey is a country of hidden fanatics who make themselves known when one questions them for whatever reason.

COMMENTS
Cowboy,read German militarism’s connivance with Committee of Union and Progress by Ümit Kardaş in this issue of TZ
VTiger
The Armenian commentators easily understand that Turkey has a fabricated history. I am sure What Armenians understand and what the author of this article meant is different. If you want to see a manufactured history go and educate yourself . Read especially the memories of the Armenian militias foug...
john the turk
There is hidden fanaticism in many countries and alot of these countries have had immense problems allowing the muslim sector to build mosques but sadly you have commented on Turkey as if the only fanatics come out of Turkey. As for Tayyip Erdogan governing Turkey well just look at the boost in the ...
zuleyha
I understand what you say. People don't think rationally.
Friend of Turks
I agree with you, fanaticism is what forbids one to accept the facts of the past but believes the fabricated history that is officially disseminated without questions.
Uncle Billy
The question should be what can be done about this? These pathologies cannot and will not disappear overnight, and transforming Turkey into a "normal" country will take a long; in the meantime something needs to be done to prevent further damage, especially to those who have been on the receiving e...
Jack Kalpakian
Excellent article. One of the few columnists who always writes with reason and ratio. Bravo!
Johan
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
What did Erdoğan gain from Washington?
17 May 2013
Can we Turkify Turkish intelligence?
15 May 2013
Security weakness
10 May 2013
Why is the CHP so important for the AKP?
8 May 2013
Time for urban battle in Kurdish cities
5 May 2013
Is the MHP on the rise?
3 May 2013
Will Turkey agree to international intervention in Syria?
1 May 2013
The coming election period and the settlement process
26 April 2013
What did Karayılan ask?
24 April 2013
The PKK's new strategy: acts of civil disobedience
21 April 2013
Kurdish nationalism on the rise
19 April 2013
Freedom of Press in Turkey
17 April 2013
Skeptics and optimists
12 April 2013
Hizbullah-PKK clashes
10 April 2013
Plan B for peace
7 April 2013
Questions for wise men committee
5 April 2013
The role of the wise-man committee
3 April 2013
New moves in the solution process
31 March 2013
Finding solutions (2)
29 March 2013
Finding solutions
24 March 2013
How is peace with the PKK being made?
22 March 2013
What is in Öcalan's message
20 March 2013
Ergenekon's bomb message
17 March 2013
Something fishy going on?
15 March 2013
The Turkish flag at Nevruz celebrations?
13 March 2013
Let PKK hostages be ambassadors for peace
10 March 2013
Who will lose?
8 March 2013
Why is Erdoğan so furious?
6 March 2013
Why were the İmralı minutes leaked?
3 March 2013
Abdullah Öcalan: ‘a man of peace'
1 March 2013
MİT targets us
27 February 2013
Erdoğan and Öcalan took the right steps, but...
24 February 2013
What to make of the visit to Öcalan?
22 February 2013
What is happening in the CHP?
20 February 2013
The BDP's Black Sea trip and the violent protests
17 February 2013
Would the PKK suicide attack again?
15 February 2013
Erdoğan's new friends: generals
13 February 2013
Where is the solution process heading?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new enemy: the EU
6 February 2013
An open letter to the American ambassador to Turkey
3 February 2013
Causes behind DHKP/C shock among diplomats
1 February 2013
Paris killings' impact on negotiation process
30 January 2013
Ömer Güney was a courier
27 January 2013
Erdoğan considering Shanghai Five
25 January 2013
Is the PKK exhausted?
23 January 2013
Forecasting politics in 2013
20 January 2013
Abdullah Öcalan benefits from peace process
18 January 2013
Discussing the peace process
16 January 2013
Would the PKK agree with the government?
13 January 2013
Killing in Paris
9 January 2013
Sledgehammer verdicts: Professor Rodrik 'deserves' Nobel Prize
6 January 2013
PKK perspective on laying down arms
2 January 2013
Can the PKK lay down its arms?
30 December 2012
Yet again Öcalan-MİT meeting
28 December 2012
Disgusting
23 December 2012
The Patriot missiles and politics
21 December 2012
Bülent Arınç and the Kurdish portfolio
19 December 2012
Kurdish politics without Talabani
16 December 2012
Taraf, democracy and freedom of the press
14 December 2012
Washington, Syria and al-Qaeda
12 December 2012
Give that medal to Öcalan and the Oslo trumpeters!
7 December 2012
A Kurdish faction within the AKP?
5 December 2012
Bring EU process back to Turkish politics
2 December 2012
Putin's visit: What to do with him?
25 November 2012
The return of Erdoğan?
23 November 2012
Kenan Evren's confession and the Sledgehammer coup
21 November 2012
Hunger strike act: the return of Abdullah Öcalan
18 November 2012
Is Turkish-Kurdish peace on the horizon?
16 November 2012
Déjà vu
14 November 2012
Erdoğan’s way
11 November 2012
Was the chopper crash in Siirt an accident or a conspiracy?
9 November 2012
How does Öcalan think? What does he want?
7 November 2012
Obama: a Thanksgiving gift to the world
4 November 2012
PKK is winning
2 November 2012
Who recorded the Oslo meetings?
31 October 2012
Is Öcalan the right actor to solve the Kurdish problem?
28 October 2012
The Öcalan theater
24 October 2012
A storm looming after Eid
21 October 2012
Erdoğan's grave mistake
17 October 2012
The state was on the verge of shelling its own people
14 October 2012
Erdoğan's fear
10 October 2012
Political implications of Diyarbakır police chief’s statements
8 October 2012
AKP’s election strategy: 50 percent threshold
5 October 2012
What is wrong with our Syrian policy?
30 September 2012
10 years in power: the AKP as ‘perception changer'
28 September 2012
‘Peace' season has arrived once more
26 September 2012
The untold tragedies of PKK parents
23 September 2012
After the Sledgehammer trial: the defendants' strategy
20 September 2012
Where is Turkey heading?
16 September 2012
Innocence of Turks, thanks to the Ergenekon investigation
14 September 2012
Kurdish nationalists' perception of PKK violence
12 September 2012
Time to discuss a Kurdish curriculum
9 September 2012
Would a ‘wise man committee' work against the PKK?
7 September 2012
Operation against Taraf on three levels
5 September 2012
What should the AKP do against the PKK’s strategy?
2 September 2012
Turkey-Iran cold war
31 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK (3): intelligence
29 August 2012
Turkey’s mistakes against the PKK (2): lack of understanding of PKK strategy
26 August 2012
Turkey's mistakes against the PKK: bureaucrat rotation and YAŞ meeting
24 August 2012
Can the PKK achieve its goal?
...