Implications of Murat Özçelik’s resignation
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 18 May 2012, Friday 1 0 0 0
EMRE USLU
e.uslu@todayszaman.com

Implications of Murat Özçelik’s resignation

Ambassador Murat Özçelik, undersecretary of Public Order and Security, an institution that was established to coordinate the fight against terror, has resigned from his position.

His resignation is due to a conflict of interest with Deputy Prime Minister Beşir Atalay, the coordinator of the Kurdish initiative.

Ambassador Özçelik is known as one of Turkey’s most knowledgeable diplomats on Iraq, particularly in terms of relations with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in northern Iraq. The outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has long taken shelter in the Kandil Mountains there. Özçelik has advocated cooperation with the Iraqi Kurds against the PKK since the mid-2000s when Turkey’s relations with northern Iraq were chilly. At that time, Ankara rejected any dialogue with them, opting instead to talk to the central government in Baghdad. Before taking over as ambassador to Baghdad in 2009, Özçelik served as Turkey’s special envoy to Iraq. He is considered to be one of the architects of the shift in Turkish foreign policy towards mending fences with Iraqi Kurds, seeking their cooperation against the PKK and improving economic ties.

A few months ago, Özçelik and his institution proposed a new strategy for the government. His plan delivered the most realistic scenario that would bring all Kurdish political actors into a dialogue but kept the PKK out of the negotiations. Instead of the PKK, Özçelik’s proposal aimed to bring the pro-PKK political party, the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP), to the negotiating table so that negotiation attempts would not be hurt if groups within the state or the PKK attempted to destroy the process.

A faction within the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government, led by Beşir Atalay, was not so happy with Özçelik’s proposal. AKP deputies who support Beşir Atalay issued statements that they do not approve of the new strategy and Atalay’s supporters in the media harshly criticized the proposal.

The reason why Atalay and his supporters are not pleased with the proposal is because Özçelik’s proposal differed from failed project by Atalay, which had aimed to negotiate only with the PKK to solve the problem. Atalay’s proposal had many shortcomings. It failed to consider the factions within the PKK and overestimated leader Abdullah Öcalan’s influence over the group. Atalay’s plan was an absolute disaster for the AKP.

It was reported that Atalay did not allow Murat Özçelik to travel outside of Ankara to discuss the Kurdish question with different community leaders. For instance, Özçelik could not travel to Diyarbakır to meet with leading figures in order to find solutions. Atalay had earned his fame with a failed Kurdish initiative proposal and had a fear of being overshadowed by other figures. Because of this, he worked against other politicians and their successful proposals. Due to this dynamic, Ambassador Özçelik was not expected to maintain his position for long.

Atalay, with the support of the National Intelligence Organization (MİT), has been insisting that the initial plan, which did not work because the PKK resumed attacks, would be effective and that the AKP government should insist on implementing it. It seems that Atalay is obsessive about his plan because, in last 9 years as a minister in the AKP government, Atalay has not been able to claim a single instance of success.

When Özçelik came up with a realistic proposal to bring the necessary actors to the negotiating table, Atalay’s proposal became outdated. Atalay could not accept this and decided instead to remove Özçelik from his post. Thus, it is safe to say that in the political sphere, Atalay eclipsed Özçelik from day one.

Aside from rivalries between bureaucrats and ministers, Öçzelik’s resignation suggests much more. It means the Atalay and MİT proposal is again coming to the forefront of the agenda. Given the fact there are many Atalay supporters at media outlets these days, it is expected the Turkish media will once again polish Atalay’s proposal and present it as an updated plan rather than a recently failed one.

Furthermore, the PKK would consider this a victory because it has stayed firm in its demand to be present at the negotiations, and it seems the AKP government is giving the PKK what it wants.

Moreover, a faction within the PKK may consider this attempt a sign of weakness and consider resuming intensive fight once again. It is well documented that whenever the PKK considers the government in Ankara weak, it intensifies its terrorism campaign. All in all, Özçelik’s resignation indicates much more than just a sign of internal conflict within the government.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
16 June 2013
Is Erdoğan a dictator?
14 June 2013
Erdoğan's world: fear and fantasy
12 June 2013
MİT in breach of law
7 June 2013
How Erdoğan sees the protests in Turkey
5 June 2013
The one-man show has ended
2 June 2013
Understanding people's anger at Tayyip Erdoğan
31 May 2013
How MİT manipulated the media: the case of Reyhanlı
29 May 2013
Turkish media and MİT
26 May 2013
Intelligence wars
24 May 2013
Do Kurdish-Turkish marriages prevent division?
22 May 2013
Syrian crisis, Ankara crisis
19 May 2013
What did Erdoğan gain from Washington?
17 May 2013
Can we Turkify Turkish intelligence?
15 May 2013
Security weakness
10 May 2013
Why is the CHP so important for the AKP?
8 May 2013
Time for urban battle in Kurdish cities
5 May 2013
Is the MHP on the rise?
3 May 2013
Will Turkey agree to international intervention in Syria?
1 May 2013
The coming election period and the settlement process
26 April 2013
What did Karayılan ask?
24 April 2013
The PKK's new strategy: acts of civil disobedience
21 April 2013
Kurdish nationalism on the rise
19 April 2013
Freedom of Press in Turkey
17 April 2013
Skeptics and optimists
12 April 2013
Hizbullah-PKK clashes
10 April 2013
Plan B for peace
7 April 2013
Questions for wise men committee
5 April 2013
The role of the wise-man committee
3 April 2013
New moves in the solution process
31 March 2013
Finding solutions (2)
29 March 2013
Finding solutions
24 March 2013
How is peace with the PKK being made?
22 March 2013
What is in Öcalan's message
20 March 2013
Ergenekon's bomb message
17 March 2013
Something fishy going on?
15 March 2013
The Turkish flag at Nevruz celebrations?
13 March 2013
Let PKK hostages be ambassadors for peace
10 March 2013
Who will lose?
8 March 2013
Why is Erdoğan so furious?
6 March 2013
Why were the İmralı minutes leaked?
3 March 2013
Abdullah Öcalan: ‘a man of peace'
1 March 2013
MİT targets us
27 February 2013
Erdoğan and Öcalan took the right steps, but...
24 February 2013
What to make of the visit to Öcalan?
22 February 2013
What is happening in the CHP?
20 February 2013
The BDP's Black Sea trip and the violent protests
17 February 2013
Would the PKK suicide attack again?
15 February 2013
Erdoğan's new friends: generals
13 February 2013
Where is the solution process heading?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new enemy: the EU
6 February 2013
An open letter to the American ambassador to Turkey
3 February 2013
Causes behind DHKP/C shock among diplomats
1 February 2013
Paris killings' impact on negotiation process
30 January 2013
Ömer Güney was a courier
27 January 2013
Erdoğan considering Shanghai Five
25 January 2013
Is the PKK exhausted?
23 January 2013
Forecasting politics in 2013
20 January 2013
Abdullah Öcalan benefits from peace process
18 January 2013
Discussing the peace process
16 January 2013
Would the PKK agree with the government?
13 January 2013
Killing in Paris
9 January 2013
Sledgehammer verdicts: Professor Rodrik 'deserves' Nobel Prize
6 January 2013
PKK perspective on laying down arms
2 January 2013
Can the PKK lay down its arms?
30 December 2012
Yet again Öcalan-MİT meeting
28 December 2012
Disgusting
23 December 2012
The Patriot missiles and politics
21 December 2012
Bülent Arınç and the Kurdish portfolio
19 December 2012
Kurdish politics without Talabani
16 December 2012
Taraf, democracy and freedom of the press
14 December 2012
Washington, Syria and al-Qaeda
12 December 2012
Give that medal to Öcalan and the Oslo trumpeters!
7 December 2012
A Kurdish faction within the AKP?
5 December 2012
Bring EU process back to Turkish politics
2 December 2012
Putin's visit: What to do with him?
25 November 2012
The return of Erdoğan?
23 November 2012
Kenan Evren's confession and the Sledgehammer coup
21 November 2012
Hunger strike act: the return of Abdullah Öcalan
18 November 2012
Is Turkish-Kurdish peace on the horizon?
16 November 2012
Déjà vu
14 November 2012
Erdoğan’s way
11 November 2012
Was the chopper crash in Siirt an accident or a conspiracy?
9 November 2012
How does Öcalan think? What does he want?
7 November 2012
Obama: a Thanksgiving gift to the world
4 November 2012
PKK is winning
2 November 2012
Who recorded the Oslo meetings?
31 October 2012
Is Öcalan the right actor to solve the Kurdish problem?
28 October 2012
The Öcalan theater
24 October 2012
A storm looming after Eid
21 October 2012
Erdoğan's grave mistake
17 October 2012
The state was on the verge of shelling its own people
14 October 2012
Erdoğan's fear
10 October 2012
Political implications of Diyarbakır police chief’s statements
8 October 2012
AKP’s election strategy: 50 percent threshold
5 October 2012
What is wrong with our Syrian policy?
30 September 2012
10 years in power: the AKP as ‘perception changer'
28 September 2012
‘Peace' season has arrived once more
26 September 2012
The untold tragedies of PKK parents
23 September 2012
After the Sledgehammer trial: the defendants' strategy
20 September 2012
Where is Turkey heading?
...
Bloggers