The significance of May Day
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
25 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 04 May 2012, Friday 0 0 0 0
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com

The significance of May Day

In many countries, May Day is a day of national celebration. In Turkey, however, May 1 has always had contradictory meanings. Compared to our past experiences on Labor Day as Turkish citizens, some differences in this year’s celebrations were remarkable.

For many years, May Day was perceived as a day celebrated only by the trade unions and also as a day marked by street violence. We also have to note that during these years there was propaganda labeling the trade unions as “leftist,” thus close to communist Russia, and they were accused of having relations with many illegal organizations, even with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

However, trade unions in Turkey are quite different to their counterparts in developed countries; the leaders of some of them are very wealthy people, for example. Besides, the majority of the working class has never given the impression that they were interested in staging a revolution.

In addition, the May Day demonstrations were fertile ground for diverse provocations. The one in 1977 was a turning point for Turkey, as many people lost their lives, and May 1 became a day of great sorrow. Only years later have we learned that this massacre was one of the steps paving the way for the Sept. 12, 1980 military coup and that it was mainly organized by the “deep state.” That’s why May Day is not only an opportunity for workers to express their grievances, but also an opportunity to face the country’s past.

Security forces were a common scene at past May Days. We were used to seeing as many policemen as demonstrators and the country’s big cities looking as if they were under occupation or preparing for an imminent foreign invasion. The high numbers and the overall attitude of the police terrorized everyone, and sometimes the police used violence just to show the people the strength of the state.

We’ve witnessed tanks and automatic weapons being used against the population in the past, not just tear gas or water cannons as nowadays. Some of the marchers were killed, injured or arrested. Their only “crime” was to participate in a political demonstration, because May Day was a “forbidden holiday” for decades.

Finally, May 1 was officially declared to be a public holiday, and the tension suddenly dropped. People joined the demonstrations with more confidence, knowing that this was no longer an illegal act. This confidence didn’t just benefit the trade unions and demonstrators, but the security forces are also more serene now. The number of uniformed policemen we see on the streets on May Day has considerably decreased. Individual acts of vandalism of course remain, but now local people and shopkeepers rather than policemen oppose the troublemakers.

Turkey is learning that it is possible to do politics without fighting in the streets or setting buildings on fire. The majority of the population is fed up with violence and skirmishes.

However, the rhetoric used by some politicians is far from pacifying. They continue to employ an aggressive tone towards each other, blaming their rivals for everything. Nevertheless, society is no longer interested in these sterile struggles because they don’t cast their votes for the one who shouts louder, but in favor of those who propose real and concrete remedies for their real and concrete problems. People care more about who is willing to change the constitution, who is more democratic and who is more capable of protecting the economy from the global crisis.

May Day was the symbol of “fear politics” in Turkey. It seems that society is no longer afraid of May Day. It would be useless from now on to build a political rhetoric based on fear.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
24 May 2013
Before the Geneva conference
21 May 2013
Erdoğan-Obama: Historic initiatives
17 May 2013
A trial in Germany
14 May 2013
The Reyhanlı attack and Europe
10 May 2013
Sounds from Turkey
7 May 2013
Israel's attacks against Syria
3 May 2013
Turbulent politics
30 April 2013
Trusting the European Union
26 April 2013
The peace process and sabotage
23 April 2013
Terrorism, Chechens and beyond
19 April 2013
Turkey: the land of fear and suspicion
16 April 2013
The Middle East and terror
12 April 2013
Peace-building as a challenge
9 April 2013
The Egyptian case
5 April 2013
The United States is in a hurry
2 April 2013
Fires in Germany
29 March 2013
The peace process and the details
26 March 2013
Turkey-Israel: a new process
22 March 2013
Intervening in Syria
19 March 2013
Cyprus-Turkey: a new period?
15 March 2013
Dealing with technical issues
12 March 2013
Upcoming elections in Iran
8 March 2013
After Hugo Chavez
5 March 2013
The global dimension of the leak
1 March 2013
The PKK and global balances
26 February 2013
An actor's choice
22 February 2013
New initiatives on Syria
19 February 2013
A challenging process
15 February 2013
Explosion at the border
12 February 2013
Peace negotiations and global circumstances
8 February 2013
Turkey-EU: a new debate
5 February 2013
Attacking the US Embassy
1 February 2013
Africa: the new chessboard
29 January 2013
Discrimination
25 January 2013
David Cameron and the EU
22 January 2013
Two journalists
18 January 2013
Attacking a university
15 January 2013
France-Turkey: new problems?
11 January 2013
Negotiating with terrorists
4 January 2013
‘We are so different that nobody understands us'
1 January 2013
Turkey-EU: A proposal from Britain?
28 December 2012
The need for transparency
25 December 2012
Student movements
21 December 2012
Risk assessment
18 December 2012
The EU’s Irish presidency
14 December 2012
A new look at Greece
11 December 2012
A new law for universities
7 December 2012
A real risk for Turkey
4 December 2012
Turkey-France: A new period?
30 November 2012
Israel-Turkey: New communication channels
27 November 2012
The Patriot issue
23 November 2012
US and Russia should open a new page
20 November 2012
Israel, Gaza and beyond
16 November 2012
US’s Israel test
13 November 2012
Reforming the United Nations
9 November 2012
US presidential election
6 November 2012
The other aspect of US elections
2 November 2012
The Middle East and nuclear proliferation
30 October 2012
Celebrating the republic
23 October 2012
Dialogue with terrorists
21 October 2012
From crisis to cooperation
16 October 2012
Brainstorming about the Middle East and Nobel
12 October 2012
A festival in Houston
9 October 2012
Terror and Europe
5 October 2012
The prime minister’s speech
2 October 2012
Palestine’s future
28 September 2012
Another way to negotiate?
25 September 2012
Discussing Muslims
21 September 2012
The Middle East quartet
18 September 2012
A movie and a trap
14 September 2012
Time to resuscitate the EU process?
11 September 2012
The presidential race in the US
7 September 2012
War scenarios between Iran and Israel
4 September 2012
Reforming education
31 August 2012
Turkey’s Syria problem
28 August 2012
Forgetting about the EU and beyond
24 August 2012
The global rivalry enters a new phase
21 August 2012
PKK’s strategy based on hatred
17 August 2012
The Syrian civil war
14 August 2012
Kidnapping a deputy
10 August 2012
Iran and Turkey’s role in Syria
7 August 2012
More deaths, alas
3 August 2012
The foreign minister’s visit to Arbil
31 July 2012
Two pieces of news, one option
27 July 2012
Domestic and international politics
24 July 2012
Can Israel intervene in Syria?
20 July 2012
Bloody Wednesday and Syria
17 July 2012
Democracy, constitution and beyond
13 July 2012
Amnesty International’s report on China
10 July 2012
Visiting the patriarchate
6 July 2012
People, governments and Turkey
3 July 2012
The Erdoğan-Zana meeting
29 June 2012
Russia’s weight in the Syrian problem
26 June 2012
Change in eastern Mediterranean balances
22 June 2012
Those who try to bring the past back
19 June 2012
Maliki, Talabani and new problems
15 June 2012
A methodological problem with coup trials
12 June 2012
The new period in France
8 June 2012
The government-opposition summit
5 June 2012
Is there a risk of ‘going back’?
...