Lausannian Turks and their adventures
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 04 May 2012, Friday 4 0 0 0
İHSAN YILMAZ
ihsan.yilmaz@todayszaman.com

Lausannian Turks and their adventures

I remember writing about Lausannian Islam here. It is a form of Turkish Islam devised by Kemalists within the borders of the Turkey set by the Lausanne Treaty of 1923 that ended World War I for Turkey.

Knowing that they would not be able to eradicate Islam totally and that allowing it some autonomy would challenge their hegemony, they decided to totally control and shape Islam in accordance with their Westernistic, modernistic, laicist and nationalist needs.

Even though this Islam was a sort of Turkish Islam, it did not address the Turks living outside the borders of the Lausannian-defined Turkish Republican borders. It did not have any transnational aspirations, claims or even sentiments. The word ummah was almost a taboo. Arabs were traitors. The main texts, call to prayer and worship were all translated into Turkish to jettison Turks’ universal ties with their fellow brethren and the whole ummah. Lausannian Islam would be used as a helping hand in Durkheimian mentality and would be used to build the most perfect citizen, whom I call LAST.

As I have written here before, LAST is an acronym for Laicist, Atatürkist, Sunni, Turk. To be a first-class citizen, one needs to be all of these four simultaneously. Any missing component would qualify one to be an enemy of the state. I also call this perfect citizen the LAST-MAN, and thinking about it again, it appeared to me that it has also a patriarchal dimension: LAST-MAN, but not LAST-WOMAN. There have of course been many first-class LAST women, but they were to a great extent always in supplementary and secondary roles. The Kemalists, being children of these lands, were also patriarchal and never treat women as equal human beings. One may also dub this perfect human type “Homo Lastus.” It is the same with Alevis, who serve the interests of Kemalists, are given some positions, prestige and power to a certain degree but are never fully trusted.

This Homo Lastus is also a Lausannian Turk. A Lausannian Turk does not have to be ethnically Turkish and as long as he is assimilated in Turkishness, has a good İstanbul accent, is a good Atatürkist and a non-practicing Sunni, he is also a first-class citizen. A Lausannian Turk, similar to the Lausannian Muslim, is not supposed to have any transnational links, brotherhoods, affiliations, ideology, claims or aspirations. Kemalists do not like anything they cannot control. That is why Turanist ideology, for instance, was not espoused by officials in the country, and fear of the Soviets is only one of the reasons. If the Lausannian Muslim were the Kemalistly loved practicing Muslim type, the Lausannian Turk is the Kemalistly loved Turkish nationalist type, who is generally a non-practicing Sunni Muslim.

The members of Homo Lastus (Lausannian Muslims and Lausannian Turks) worship the state and they do everything they can to help its ideology and power. The state uses Homo Lastus for surveillance purposes. They ubiquitously check and control other members of the society to see if they are under control and do not do anything wrong.

They also monitor their fellow-traveler Homo Lastus and newcomers who claim to be assimilated. For instance, the old Homo Lastus does not hesitate to check the garbage of the new Homo Lastus to see if there are empty wine or beer bottles in it. Or they invite them to ball parties and observe if the new one is happy when his wife is dancing with someone else. Or they take them to beaches to see if they are comfortable in their bikinis. All these are obviously worse than Daniel Pipes’ notorious Campus Watch. In social gatherings, the old Homo Lastus would closely watch you to see if you enjoy your wine or are just faking it. I call this activity the “Kemalist orgasmic watch.” It is there to see if you are enjoying your new identity or just faking it.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
Turkey, US and Russia on Syria
15 May 2013
Reyhanlı, the next 25 years and Alevis
10 May 2013
Politicians, privileges and Islamic law
8 May 2013
Politicians and corruption in Turkey
3 May 2013
Polarization
1 May 2013
Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul
26 April 2013
1915 (2)
24 April 2013
1915 (1)
19 April 2013
From Islamism to either post-Islamism or ‘lost Islamism'
17 April 2013
Erdoğan: both an asset and a liability for the new Turkey
12 April 2013
Disappointment in Turkish Islamists vis-à-vis press freedoms
10 April 2013
The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel
3 April 2013
‘General Will,' Kemalists and neo-Kemalists
29 March 2013
Practicing Muslims and social (in)justice
27 March 2013
Wise men?
22 March 2013
Öcalan, PKK, AKP, Erdoğan
20 March 2013
From Hasan Cemal
15 March 2013
The İmralı peace process and defaming Hizmet
13 March 2013
Freedom of the press in Turkey
8 March 2013
Criticizing authoritarian tendencies and practices of today
6 March 2013
Apo TV
1 March 2013
Turkish nationalism and my Said Nursi
27 February 2013
I am not a nationalist
22 February 2013
Modern age slavery and practicing Muslims
20 February 2013
The new constitution and social-engineering the “best” citizen
15 February 2013
How my message was distorted by a Western ‘journalist'
13 February 2013
Practicing Muslims, human rights and global Hilf al-Fudul
8 February 2013
Caring for the 42 percent, the new constitution and Abant spirit
6 February 2013
Shanghai criteria, the EU and our Islamists
1 February 2013
Social (in)justice in Turkey
30 January 2013
Quality of academics and scholars in Turkey
25 January 2013
The Kurdish initiative, the AKP and losing the Kurds
18 January 2013
In memory of Mehmet Ali Birand
9 January 2013
Practicing Muslims and negotiating with the Kurdists
4 January 2013
Practicing Muslims' old and new problems with meritocracy
2 January 2013
Meritocracy and practicing Muslims
28 December 2012
Erdoğan and Ergenekon: two options
26 December 2012
Kemalo-Islamists
21 December 2012
Taxation, social justice, neo-liberalism, AKP and the Turkish Islamists
19 December 2012
Taraf and its enemies
14 December 2012
AKP and the Kurdish problem
12 December 2012
Turkish readings of Egyptian politics
7 December 2012
The AKP and the religious Kurds
5 December 2012
The ‘Patriots’ and the difficulty of being a Turkish Islamist
30 November 2012
The Palestinian state
28 November 2012
Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia
23 November 2012
Israeli brutality and the democratic gap in the Middle East
21 November 2012
‘Sacred, Secular, Twin Tolerations and the Hizmet’
16 November 2012
Syria, Israel and Turkey’s predicaments in the Middle East
9 November 2012
Failure of post-Islamism and construction of official Islam
7 November 2012
Who is tarnishing Turkey’s image?
2 November 2012
AKP as both asset, liability to worldwide Muslim politics
31 October 2012
The miserable opposition
24 October 2012
Qurbani in the Islamophobic Turkish media
19 October 2012
Kurdish villagers, Erdoğan and Gül
17 October 2012
The difficulty of criticizing the AKP
12 October 2012
Crying for the terrorists
10 October 2012
Positive signs at the İstanbul Forum
5 October 2012
Syrian cul-de-sac and remembering Cyprus 1974
3 October 2012
2023 vision: excellent; 2013 vision: absent
28 September 2012
Understanding Balyoz officers: the military as a total institution
26 September 2012
Anti-Erdoğanism and 2014
21 September 2012
Difficulty of being critical
19 September 2012
Reforming the army?
14 September 2012
Criticizing Hizmet
12 September 2012
MİT, the army, the Foreign Ministry and I
7 September 2012
Is Davutoğlu the culprit?
5 September 2012
Erdoğan and the PKK, his Achilles’ heel
31 August 2012
AKP, Hizmet and politics
29 August 2012
Defeating the AKP in elections?
24 August 2012
Silent intellectuals and talking to the PKK?
22 August 2012
The PKK and speaking the unspeakable
17 August 2012
The PKK and the people’s wish
10 August 2012
A failed fairy tale of a poor imprisoned German-Turk
9 August 2012
Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet Movement
8 August 2012
Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
3 August 2012
7 arrows of Kemalo-Islamism
1 August 2012
The AKP and the Alevi problem in Turkey
27 July 2012
Zero problems with (Kurdish) neighbors?
25 July 2012
Mor Gabriel Monastery and the new AKP
20 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (2)
18 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (1)
13 July 2012
AKP: No longer a democratizing force
11 July 2012
Domestic humanistic depth: missing dimension of Turkish foreign policy
6 July 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Quo vadis?
4 July 2012
Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet
29 June 2012
Syria and Turkish foreign policy
27 June 2012
Syria: winner take all?
22 June 2012
Abant Platform: perspectives on Turkey
20 June 2012
Hizmet and the Kurdish question
13 June 2012
‘Shallow-land’
8 June 2012
Kurdish issue, AKP and MHP
6 June 2012
Pluralism in Turkey and Islamism
1 June 2012
AKP: reverting back to Islamism?
30 May 2012
Revisiting the AKP
25 May 2012
The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists
23 May 2012
Who has infiltrated the Turkish state?
18 May 2012
Are there a few Hizmet(s)?
16 May 2012
The game against Hizmet
11 May 2012
Why do we need a presidential system?
...