Coup by invitation
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 April 2012, Tuesday 6 0 0 0
DOĞU ERGİL
d.ergil@todayszaman.com

Coup by invitation

The soldiers and probably the civilians who designed the postmodern coup of Feb. 28, 1997, are about to be charged in a court of law for overthrowing a democratically elected government or making it impossible for that government to function. It has been 15 years since then. The fact that legal action can be taken now is because the power of the military establishment has been reduced to size by the incumbent government.

Why is the event called a postmodern phenomenon? The coalition government, made up of Necmettin Erbakan’s religious Welfare Party (RP) and Tansu Çiller’s True Path Party (DYP), was forced to resign without the need for the military to resort to brute force as it did in previous coups. The other significant difference was the broad front that had been built to confront the coalition government. In addition to soldiers, the business community, sections of the judiciary, academia, civil society organizations, labor and trade unions/associations and President Süleyman Demirel were involved. The public voice of this opposition front was the mainstream media. The Hürriyet and Sabah dailies were especially instrumental in launching smear campaigns, floating false rumors and organizing character assassinations. There were also a number of murders committed by unidentified persons thought to be connected to official circles.

Cengiz Çandar, a writer for Radikal, witnessed conversations and events that implicated an American group that would later be called the neocons, which was close to Israel and the Israelis, who developed very tight and lucrative relations with the Turkish military. (See an interview with Neşe Düzel in Taraf’s April 16, 2012 edition.) Most instrumental in this relationship was Gen. Çevik Bir, the deputy chief of General Staff at the time.

At the time, the Turkish military had virtually abandoned its role as a professional defense institution and had taken on a purely political role. Its basic aim was to reshape society from top to bottom in a militaristic way and to create a political system whereby the bureaucracy, at the core of which the military stood, would rule without any accountability or competition from civilian forces. All other institutions and the urban bourgeoisie that was the creation of the state would uphold this oligarchic regime.

In order to legitimize its role, termed its “national mission,” it relied on two things: fear of separatist (Kurdish) and obscurantist (Islamic fundamentalism) threats and the cult of Atatürk, which it believed was the founder of the praetorian system. Staging an armed coup would be too hard to explain to the world (it did not care much about the public opinion it had manipulated). So it prepared the stage for its intervention with its civilian accomplices.

One of the most profitable alliances it forged was with the urban business community of western Turkey. Adm. Özden Örnek, commander of the naval forces, noted in his series “Darbe Günlükleri” (Memoirs of a Coup) (ed. Alper Görmüş, Taraf, April 16, 2012, p.9) that “businessmen approach us soldiers and use us as their guardians against others. What they really want is for us to stage coups while they take their (lucrative) share.”

It is a well-known fact that each authoritarian government is not only repressive but also kleptocratic. The banking system was drained completely, and this theft was reflected on the people as a “working loss,” bringing the living standards of the people down considerably. TL 380 billion evaporated from the banks during this time, and Turkey’s annual tax revenue was lower than this number.

The coalition government wanted to reduce the exorbitant amount of interest paid for state-run economic enterprises. The rich made enormous sums of money by lending to these profitless enterprises. In 1977, the interest expenditure in the general budget was TL 1.9 billion. After the fall of the Erbakan government, in 1998, it rose to TL 5.6 billion and reached TL 10.7 billion in 1999. Those businessmen who supported the Feb. 28 coup were given licenses to establish banks, which the businessmen emptied out after a while. Media barons were also among those draining the banks.

As one general put it, “Feb. 28 will last a thousand years.” That is what they thought in an atmosphere in which civil society and popular will was suppressed. Their dream became the nightmare of the nation. Only 15 years later have they, too, awakened to a reality that is not of their making. Gen. Bir has been arrested. He joins other generals in prison who thought they were the kings of the universe just because they bore the arms the nation gave them to defend the country.

COMMENTS
MR ERGIL It might be nice to do a follow up to see who exactly is getting rich in Turkey today from forming banks, and taking over public utilities, and construction the massive projects? hmmmmmm
Me
DANIEL I have seen a much better bumper sticker that applies to religion across the board. "The Religious Right is neither" meaning they aren't religious and they aren't right. NASER Oddly enough in the bible is says "Vengance is mine sayeth the LORD" Meaning that the only one who should seek r...
Me
There is no evidence that Satan has harmed anyone. But the followers of prophets like Moses, Jesus and Mohammad have slaughtered millions of human beings in the name of their gods -and continue to perpetrate all sorts of inequality, injustice and cruel oppression. A bumper sticker reads, "Oh! Jesus,...
Daniel
Neither Allah nor Zeus will save Turkey, but democracy along with its checks and balances, independent judiciary, free media and a well-entrenched culture of respect for the right of fellow citizens to be heard will! All these things are not quite possible as long as the sick and despotic Kemalist v...
David
"He said: Whoever doth wrong, him shall we punish; then shall he be sent back to his Lord; and He will punish him with a punishment unheard-of (before)", The Wise Qur'an (18:87). Thus, Allah punishes the followers of the Pharaohs in this world and the next. However, in every opportunity they let the...
Naser Chowdhury
May Allah save Turkey from the clouts of these ruthless beasts forever.
Nageyec
Click here to read all user comments
Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
18 June 2013
Butterfly effect
15 June 2013
Symbols and sensitivities
10 June 2013
Messages from Taksim Square (2)
9 June 2013
Messages from Taksim Square (1)
4 June 2013
Secularism and authority
30 May 2013
The near abroad
28 May 2013
Trouble on the horizon
26 May 2013
The unnoticed revolution
20 May 2013
Syria in the eye of the beholder
19 May 2013
Syria between a rock and a hard place
14 May 2013
Syria exploding
12 May 2013
Awakening
7 May 2013
Iraq in turmoil (1)
5 May 2013
Questions and sincerity
30 April 2013
Poisonous questions
28 April 2013
Pride and Prejudice
23 April 2013
Scenes from Central Anatolia
21 April 2013
Official vs. Civic
16 April 2013
Iraqi Turkmens
14 April 2013
Oh Kurd (2)
9 April 2013
Oh Kurd (1)
7 April 2013
Oh Turk, (2)
2 April 2013
Oh Turk,
31 March 2013
Syria and Kurds
26 March 2013
Israel's apology
24 March 2013
Time to celebrate
19 March 2013
Meltdown
17 March 2013
A new phase in globalization
12 March 2013
A day for women
10 March 2013
EU membership: realities and aspirations
5 March 2013
The leak and the aftermath
3 March 2013
Where to tap?
26 February 2013
Syrian stalemate and the tragedy of inaction
24 February 2013
Presidency and the ‘grand peace’ offer
19 February 2013
Hope and caution
17 February 2013
Political perceptions
12 February 2013
Europe vs. Asia; elite vs. public
10 February 2013
Scenarios in the Syrian conflict
5 February 2013
Assessment of political and economic trends
3 February 2013
From Brussels to Shanghai
29 January 2013
Egypt and Iran
27 January 2013
‘Open Networks, Closed Regimes’
22 January 2013
Kurdish landscape is bustling
20 January 2013
Dividends of peace
15 January 2013
Peace with the dragon
13 January 2013
Dangers ahead
8 January 2013
Changes and challenges to understanding the Kurdish problem
6 January 2013
New year, new constitution?
1 January 2013
The 8 most interesting things we learned in 2012
30 December 2012
A 2012 account of Turkish foreign policy
25 December 2012
Interesting developments
23 December 2012
Iraqi prospects in Kurdish parentheses
18 December 2012
Turkey’s popularity in the Middle East
16 December 2012
Civil war in words and deeds
11 December 2012
Suicides in the army
9 December 2012
The pro-coup makeup in our DNA
4 December 2012
The secret army
2 December 2012
Violence against women
27 November 2012
The Kurdish house
25 November 2012
After the hunger strikes
20 November 2012
Is this a war?
18 November 2012
Life is a mirror: You get what you give
13 November 2012
Remembering and contemplating Atatürk
11 November 2012
Ending hunger strikes and political folly
6 November 2012
Elections and US foreign policy debate
23 October 2012
A slightly different competition
21 October 2012
Syria tough test for goals of ex-Ottomans
16 October 2012
Strategic depth (1)
9 October 2012
On war
7 October 2012
Another name for Syria: uncertainty
2 October 2012
Regional dynamics at play at the AKP congress
30 September 2012
The AKP congress
25 September 2012
Turkey, Israel and Egypt
23 September 2012
Systemic flaws
18 September 2012
On extremism
16 September 2012
Shadow boxing
11 September 2012
Tenacity of Syrian regime
9 September 2012
Questions and prejudices
4 September 2012
The Syrian enigma
2 September 2012
A bold new world?
28 August 2012
Here we stand?
26 August 2012
Questioning the Kurdish question
21 August 2012
US elections frivolous games
19 August 2012
One more time
14 August 2012
Syrian challenges
12 August 2012
Turkey’s Kurdish imbroglio as seen from outside
7 August 2012
Brotherhood?
5 August 2012
Syria unfolding
31 July 2012
Syria and Turkey: a friendship that went astray
29 July 2012
Whither goes the regime change in Syria
24 July 2012
Two-tier war in Syria
22 July 2012
Living with the hegemon
17 July 2012
Differing official rhetoric and common problems
15 July 2012
Turkey in the Syrian ‘problem’
10 July 2012
Strangers in their own land
8 July 2012
Russia and Israel on Syria
3 July 2012
The princess and the phoenix
1 July 2012
Reciprocity
26 June 2012
An intricate strategy
24 June 2012
Egypt’s hijacked spring
...
Bloggers