February 28 and beyond
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 17 April 2012, Tuesday 1 0 0 0
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com

February 28 and beyond

It is simply not possible for Turkey to strengthen its democracy without having faced past coups and coup attempts. This is also necessary in order to succeed in elaborating a new, democratic and pluralist constitution. We know that the present constitution and the structures it created are frequently used to justify coup attempts. That’s why it is inevitable to rewrite the constitution and implement structural reforms in order to look at the country’s democratic future with more confidence.

The majority of the people in Turkey have realized at last that it is pointless to label some coups as bad and others good, according to the perpetrators or the coup’s targets. What is important is to admit that coups are unjustifiable once you agree to live according to democratic principles. It is also crucial to be able to judge anyone who has tried, or succeeded, to topple elected governments. The coup trials will reinforce the struggle against all actions and groups that have supported the coups, keeping in mind that some civilians, too, have played their role in those coups and coup attempts.

Until now, those who have been brought to justice in the context of coup trials were mostly retired or active duty officers. Some journalists who have tried to justify the coup attempts by several means were also included in these trials. However, we have to admit that Turkey’s judicial system and the trial procedures have some serious failures; thus, the coup trials are sometimes accused of not being democratic. It is essential to have a judiciary that will not allow accidents that can derail the entire process.

Military coups are, by definition, perpetrated by the armed forces. However, we mustn’t neglect the fact that the armed forces don’t prepare and implement their coups without civilian assistance. In other words, every coup and coup attempt has civilian and political supporters.

There are two groups of politicians who help the elaboration of the coups: The first group prepares the groundwork for the coup willingly or unwillingly by making sure that the normal democratic processes don’t work. The second group openly collaborates with the plotters in the hope of replacing the current government. Moreover, these politicians always enjoy some support from the business world, too. In other words, coups are carried out with the cooperation of three kinds of actors: military, political and economic. Until now, the trials about Turkey’s past coups were focused on the military aspect of the coups, while the other segments behind the coups have been neglected.

The political and economic actors who have played important roles in the coups are not yet totally exposed. Society has an opinion about their identities and what roles they have played, but one, of course, needs tangible proof to bring them to justice.

Nevertheless, exposing the contribution of the political and economic actors in the coups may be hard, as most of these people are still active in the country’s political and economic life. Besides, some of them have pretty sinister relationships, including with terrorist organizations, foreign intelligence agencies or gangs involved in smuggling, which not surprisingly makes us wonder about possible connections with Turkey’s Southeast problem.

To give a concrete example, one of the most important issues to be investigated are the links between those political and economic actors and the arms industry. A thorough investigation into weapons purchases and modernization contracts may provide important clues about the economic dimension of the coup attempts. Divulging a number of ugly truths is the only way to prevent a repetition of Feb. 28-like postmodern coup attempts.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
A trial in Germany
14 May 2013
The Reyhanlı attack and Europe
10 May 2013
Sounds from Turkey
7 May 2013
Israel's attacks against Syria
3 May 2013
Turbulent politics
30 April 2013
Trusting the European Union
26 April 2013
The peace process and sabotage
23 April 2013
Terrorism, Chechens and beyond
19 April 2013
Turkey: the land of fear and suspicion
16 April 2013
The Middle East and terror
12 April 2013
Peace-building as a challenge
9 April 2013
The Egyptian case
5 April 2013
The United States is in a hurry
2 April 2013
Fires in Germany
29 March 2013
The peace process and the details
26 March 2013
Turkey-Israel: a new process
22 March 2013
Intervening in Syria
19 March 2013
Cyprus-Turkey: a new period?
15 March 2013
Dealing with technical issues
12 March 2013
Upcoming elections in Iran
8 March 2013
After Hugo Chavez
5 March 2013
The global dimension of the leak
1 March 2013
The PKK and global balances
26 February 2013
An actor's choice
22 February 2013
New initiatives on Syria
19 February 2013
A challenging process
15 February 2013
Explosion at the border
12 February 2013
Peace negotiations and global circumstances
8 February 2013
Turkey-EU: a new debate
5 February 2013
Attacking the US Embassy
1 February 2013
Africa: the new chessboard
29 January 2013
Discrimination
25 January 2013
David Cameron and the EU
22 January 2013
Two journalists
18 January 2013
Attacking a university
15 January 2013
France-Turkey: new problems?
11 January 2013
Negotiating with terrorists
4 January 2013
‘We are so different that nobody understands us'
1 January 2013
Turkey-EU: A proposal from Britain?
28 December 2012
The need for transparency
25 December 2012
Student movements
21 December 2012
Risk assessment
18 December 2012
The EU’s Irish presidency
14 December 2012
A new look at Greece
11 December 2012
A new law for universities
7 December 2012
A real risk for Turkey
4 December 2012
Turkey-France: A new period?
30 November 2012
Israel-Turkey: New communication channels
27 November 2012
The Patriot issue
23 November 2012
US and Russia should open a new page
20 November 2012
Israel, Gaza and beyond
16 November 2012
US’s Israel test
13 November 2012
Reforming the United Nations
9 November 2012
US presidential election
6 November 2012
The other aspect of US elections
2 November 2012
The Middle East and nuclear proliferation
30 October 2012
Celebrating the republic
23 October 2012
Dialogue with terrorists
21 October 2012
From crisis to cooperation
16 October 2012
Brainstorming about the Middle East and Nobel
12 October 2012
A festival in Houston
9 October 2012
Terror and Europe
5 October 2012
The prime minister’s speech
2 October 2012
Palestine’s future
28 September 2012
Another way to negotiate?
25 September 2012
Discussing Muslims
21 September 2012
The Middle East quartet
18 September 2012
A movie and a trap
14 September 2012
Time to resuscitate the EU process?
11 September 2012
The presidential race in the US
7 September 2012
War scenarios between Iran and Israel
4 September 2012
Reforming education
31 August 2012
Turkey’s Syria problem
28 August 2012
Forgetting about the EU and beyond
24 August 2012
The global rivalry enters a new phase
21 August 2012
PKK’s strategy based on hatred
17 August 2012
The Syrian civil war
14 August 2012
Kidnapping a deputy
10 August 2012
Iran and Turkey’s role in Syria
7 August 2012
More deaths, alas
3 August 2012
The foreign minister’s visit to Arbil
31 July 2012
Two pieces of news, one option
27 July 2012
Domestic and international politics
24 July 2012
Can Israel intervene in Syria?
20 July 2012
Bloody Wednesday and Syria
17 July 2012
Democracy, constitution and beyond
13 July 2012
Amnesty International’s report on China
10 July 2012
Visiting the patriarchate
6 July 2012
People, governments and Turkey
3 July 2012
The Erdoğan-Zana meeting
29 June 2012
Russia’s weight in the Syrian problem
26 June 2012
Change in eastern Mediterranean balances
22 June 2012
Those who try to bring the past back
19 June 2012
Maliki, Talabani and new problems
15 June 2012
A methodological problem with coup trials
12 June 2012
The new period in France
8 June 2012
The government-opposition summit
5 June 2012
Is there a risk of ‘going back’?
1 June 2012
The richness of plurality, impossibility of uniformity
29 May 2012
Individuals as pillars of democracy
...