State of Ergenekon: alive and kicking
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 June 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 21 March 2012, Wednesday 2 0 0 0
İHSAN YILMAZ
ihsan.yilmaz@todayszaman.com

State of Ergenekon: alive and kicking

Even though some Justice and Development Party (AKP) politicians seem to think that the mafioso deep state -- aka the Ergenekon terrorist organization -- is dead, recent developments have shown once again that it is in good shape, alive and kicking. The deep state tradition in Turkey goes back at least 100 years, and it is not easy to dismantle it. So far only some of its legs and arms have been captured by the judiciary, but not the body, nor the brain.

Only the most recent Uludere incident, which shocked the AKP government, is a telling example that democratic forces are still not in full control of the state. This is the case, despite the fact that we have a ruling party with a 50 percent mandate. Imagine what could happen if today’s Republican People’s Party (CHP) and Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) form a coalition government. As soon as they come to power, the bureaucracy will immediately start serving them. These two parties have employed thousands of their ideological fellow travelers in the state bureaucracy, and they keep silent and remain passive nowadays thanks to the strong one-party rule. There are only about 250 people -- some 50 of them in prison -- being tried in Ergenekon cases, and it is obvious that a deep state cannot be run by only 250 people. In addition to the brain there must be many sleeping cells. The recent psychological war campaign launched against some judges, prosecutors and police officers that deal with the case shows that Ergenekon has not given up and, quite to the contrary, it is still very strong.

Let us start with the recent European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decision on Ergenekon. The ECtHR noted that evidence such as reports of wiretaps suggested that the applicant (Tuncay Özkan) had followed the instructions of a military organization. Documents and materials were seized during various house searches before the applicant’s arrest. It was on the suspicion of a crime that he was charged and severely punished by the penal code.

“It is therefore appropriate to conclude that the applicant can be said to have been arrested and detained on the basis of ‘plausible reasons to be suspected’ of having committed a criminal offense… The Court therefore finds that there is no evidence in this case that the interpretation and application of legal provisions cited by the domestic authorities were arbitrary or unreasonable as to confer on the applicant’s arrest an irregular character… the Court considers that the length of the proceedings, taken as a whole, did not exceed, to date, a reasonable time.”

This was a huge blow to the manifest and latent Ergenekon supporters who have constantly and staunchly claimed that the politicized judiciary and police have been imprisoning the critics of the AKP government and/or the Hizmet (Gülen) movement. But guess what? The Turkish public, especially the followers of the Doğan Media Group, are largely uninformed about this decision. A few days ago I was talking to a friend of mine who is Turkish, lives in Turkey and, above all, is a full professor of Turkish politics, and I was astonished to learn that he was not aware of the ECtHR’s Tuncay Özkan decision. This professor reads newspapers, watches TV and could be said to be a pro-AKP person but did not hear about the Özkan case. Can you imagine if the Özkan verdict was in the opposite direction? We would be witnessing a huge media campaign and everybody in Turkey would know about the case.

Another interesting case is Nedim Şener and Ahmet Şık’s release from prison. It appears that the court believes time served to be equivalent or more than the possible sentence. Thus, keeping them in custody would be unjust. Disregarding this and also the fact that their trial still continues – with hundreds of other suspects who aren’t in prison -- the pro-Ergenekon camp has declared their innocence. Ahmet Şık stated very harshly that the police, prosecutors and judges in the Hizmet movement were behind their illegal arrest and that they will soon be imprisoned. Supporting Şık, the former editor-in-chief of the bureaucratic oligarchy’s Hürriyet daily, Ertuğrul Özkök, wrote that in the medium term Turkey will have a court case to try these police officers, prosecutors and judges. What is more, the general mood in the Ergenekon-friendly media is also similar. So much so that the Sabah daily’s Nazlı Ilıcak sarcastically wrote that we should therefore imprison those police, prosecutors and judges who have been working against the Ergenekon terror organization.

It is high time to remember what the Ergenekon legend is all about: “The legend takes its name from the Central Asian valley in which Gökturks fleeing from the Chinese sought refuge. There was only one way leading into this place. They lived there for over 400 years. After that time they decided to leave the mountain. But they didn’t know the way out. A blacksmith said the mountain was full of iron ore. So they made a huge fire to smelt the iron. They fed the fire for days until they melted a passage out of the mountain.”

A legend is never just a legend!

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
14 June 2013
Turkey: one country, several nations?
12 June 2013
Tension within the AKP
7 June 2013
New politics in Turkey
5 June 2013
Saving the AKP from neo-con democrats
31 May 2013
The İstanbul problem
29 May 2013
Polarization, polarization, polarization
24 May 2013
Islamism, Muslim politics and Islam-compatible politics
22 May 2013
The AKP's presidential system?
17 May 2013
Turkey, US and Russia on Syria
15 May 2013
Reyhanlı, the next 25 years and Alevis
10 May 2013
Politicians, privileges and Islamic law
8 May 2013
Politicians and corruption in Turkey
3 May 2013
Polarization
1 May 2013
Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul
26 April 2013
1915 (2)
24 April 2013
1915 (1)
19 April 2013
From Islamism to either post-Islamism or ‘lost Islamism'
17 April 2013
Erdoğan: both an asset and a liability for the new Turkey
12 April 2013
Disappointment in Turkish Islamists vis-à-vis press freedoms
10 April 2013
The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel
3 April 2013
‘General Will,' Kemalists and neo-Kemalists
29 March 2013
Practicing Muslims and social (in)justice
27 March 2013
Wise men?
22 March 2013
Öcalan, PKK, AKP, Erdoğan
20 March 2013
From Hasan Cemal
15 March 2013
The İmralı peace process and defaming Hizmet
13 March 2013
Freedom of the press in Turkey
8 March 2013
Criticizing authoritarian tendencies and practices of today
6 March 2013
Apo TV
1 March 2013
Turkish nationalism and my Said Nursi
27 February 2013
I am not a nationalist
22 February 2013
Modern age slavery and practicing Muslims
20 February 2013
The new constitution and social-engineering the “best” citizen
15 February 2013
How my message was distorted by a Western ‘journalist'
13 February 2013
Practicing Muslims, human rights and global Hilf al-Fudul
8 February 2013
Caring for the 42 percent, the new constitution and Abant spirit
6 February 2013
Shanghai criteria, the EU and our Islamists
1 February 2013
Social (in)justice in Turkey
30 January 2013
Quality of academics and scholars in Turkey
25 January 2013
The Kurdish initiative, the AKP and losing the Kurds
18 January 2013
In memory of Mehmet Ali Birand
9 January 2013
Practicing Muslims and negotiating with the Kurdists
4 January 2013
Practicing Muslims' old and new problems with meritocracy
2 January 2013
Meritocracy and practicing Muslims
28 December 2012
Erdoğan and Ergenekon: two options
26 December 2012
Kemalo-Islamists
21 December 2012
Taxation, social justice, neo-liberalism, AKP and the Turkish Islamists
19 December 2012
Taraf and its enemies
14 December 2012
AKP and the Kurdish problem
12 December 2012
Turkish readings of Egyptian politics
7 December 2012
The AKP and the religious Kurds
5 December 2012
The ‘Patriots’ and the difficulty of being a Turkish Islamist
30 November 2012
The Palestinian state
28 November 2012
Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia
23 November 2012
Israeli brutality and the democratic gap in the Middle East
21 November 2012
‘Sacred, Secular, Twin Tolerations and the Hizmet’
16 November 2012
Syria, Israel and Turkey’s predicaments in the Middle East
9 November 2012
Failure of post-Islamism and construction of official Islam
7 November 2012
Who is tarnishing Turkey’s image?
2 November 2012
AKP as both asset, liability to worldwide Muslim politics
31 October 2012
The miserable opposition
24 October 2012
Qurbani in the Islamophobic Turkish media
19 October 2012
Kurdish villagers, Erdoğan and Gül
17 October 2012
The difficulty of criticizing the AKP
12 October 2012
Crying for the terrorists
10 October 2012
Positive signs at the İstanbul Forum
5 October 2012
Syrian cul-de-sac and remembering Cyprus 1974
3 October 2012
2023 vision: excellent; 2013 vision: absent
28 September 2012
Understanding Balyoz officers: the military as a total institution
26 September 2012
Anti-Erdoğanism and 2014
21 September 2012
Difficulty of being critical
19 September 2012
Reforming the army?
14 September 2012
Criticizing Hizmet
12 September 2012
MİT, the army, the Foreign Ministry and I
7 September 2012
Is Davutoğlu the culprit?
5 September 2012
Erdoğan and the PKK, his Achilles’ heel
31 August 2012
AKP, Hizmet and politics
29 August 2012
Defeating the AKP in elections?
24 August 2012
Silent intellectuals and talking to the PKK?
22 August 2012
The PKK and speaking the unspeakable
17 August 2012
The PKK and the people’s wish
10 August 2012
A failed fairy tale of a poor imprisoned German-Turk
9 August 2012
Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet Movement
8 August 2012
Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
3 August 2012
7 arrows of Kemalo-Islamism
1 August 2012
The AKP and the Alevi problem in Turkey
27 July 2012
Zero problems with (Kurdish) neighbors?
25 July 2012
Mor Gabriel Monastery and the new AKP
20 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (2)
18 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (1)
13 July 2012
AKP: No longer a democratizing force
11 July 2012
Domestic humanistic depth: missing dimension of Turkish foreign policy
6 July 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Quo vadis?
4 July 2012
Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet
29 June 2012
Syria and Turkish foreign policy
27 June 2012
Syria: winner take all?
22 June 2012
Abant Platform: perspectives on Turkey
20 June 2012
Hizmet and the Kurdish question
13 June 2012
‘Shallow-land’
8 June 2012
Kurdish issue, AKP and MHP
...
Bloggers