Ceausescus never die; neither do Bashars!
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 29 February 2012, Wednesday 1 0 0 0
CENGİZ AKTAR
c.aktar@todayszaman.com

Ceausescus never die; neither do Bashars!

On Dec. 25, 1989, Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife were sentenced to death after a hasty trial, and they were executed on the same day.

 I still remember, as may a few fans in Romania, a protest was held only in Turkey where the demonstrators chanted, “Ceausescus never die.” Some of the reactions to the ongoing mass slaughter in Syria today are a reflection of the same wicked and twisted state of mind. A group of institutions claiming to represent either the right or the left, including some remnants of Ergenekon, closely sticking to an “anti-imperialist” cause, has been defending the brutal dictatorship in Syria. They had done this before for former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Take the demonstration the other day in Hatay (Antioch), called “End to the Imperialist Interventions in the Middle East and Syria.” In a press statement, it was argued that what has been going in Syria was part of a plan devised by the US and Israel, that the peoples of Turkey, as well as the people in Syria, will not be deceived by this plot and that there was a strong need for return to the ties of brotherhood between Turkey and Syria. It is like a time tunnel, is it not? The new Cold War-like alliance composed of China, Iran and Russia that care for Syria nowadays has an extension here in those who drafted this insane press statement.

I wonder where the organizers of this protest and drafters of the press statement live. How could they speak from a place where they are isolated from the facts and events and the torture that Syrians are being subjected to, where thousands of them are killed by the regular army? How could one ignore the reaction, dissatisfaction and objections raised by the people over there just because the US or Israel would supposedly benefit at the end from the popular uprising? Is it so difficult to realize that the Syrian army, which failed to fire a single bullet at the Israeli army Tsahal, can show its teeth only against its own people?

Faruk Loğoğlu from the CHP [Republican People’s Party] has also made several statements on Syria over the last month. His statements are no different than the useless position I described above: “Turkey should be in search of how we could bring stability, peace and reconciliation to Syria rather than options to interfere with its internal affairs. Like we, the CHP, recommended, Turkey should call for a meeting in Turkey or in the region that will bring together the UN Secretary-General and representatives from the Arab League, European Union, Russia and Iran as well as delegates from the opposition groups in Syria. The goal of the meeting should be to draft a roadmap that would put an end to violence in Syria. Turkey’s part, in terms of humanitarian obligations, is limited to extending help and assistance to the people in need within legitimate restrictions. Turkey’s intervention in Syrian affairs other than for humanitarian reasons will take our country and the entire region into a deadlock. We warn the AKP [Justice and Development Party] government and invite them to act carefully and cautiously.” Alice in Wonderland!

How could they ignore the fact that the government has been doing everything it could with respect to the Syrian issue? First, they attempted to normalize the state of affairs in Syria by working in cooperation with the current administration. The attempts included visa exemption, enhancement of commercial ties and maintenance of dialogue. There was even more. Turkey tried to explain the situation to the US. Every attempt failed. Now, there are ongoing projects to ensure a regime change in the country. Despite the shaky situation, the embassy in Damascus is still open. The opposition is supported, the doors are open to asylum seekers and the government, in cooperation with other countries, tries to do everything it can. While it is obvious that the UN Security Council will not offer any remedy after the double veto by China and Russia, is it reasonable to call on all related parties? The Friends of Syria, a bold initiative launched after it became evident that the UN would no longer serve as an appropriate venue for talks, is now on the move. The recent meeting in Tunis, boycotted by China and Russia but honored by more than 60 countries, was the first leg of this initiative. We should also note the assignment of former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan as the representative of both the UN and Arab League Special Envoy for Syria with consent from Russia.

It is not certain how long the China-Iran-Russia front, as well as our “anti-imperialist” groupies, will remain opposed to effective action in face of the military campaign in Homs against its inhabitants, the growing casualties -- the death toll has risen to 7,600 -- as well as countless wounded people and the terror against reporters. What is certain is the motto of almost all ethnic and religious groups in Syria, with the exception of a few still benefitting from the regime: “Yalla irhal, ya Bashar” (Get out, Bashar).

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
15 May 2013
Europe Week: legitimacy crisis versus bright spots
8 May 2013
Last constitution of ancient Turkey
1 May 2013
What was April 24?
24 April 2013
Economy and waste
17 April 2013
Realpolitik and the new ethic
10 April 2013
Towards regionalization?
3 April 2013
Negotiation time for AK Party
27 March 2013
Israel and its apology
20 March 2013
What if we simply call it the ‘democratization process'?
13 March 2013
European Charter of Local Self-Government revisited
6 March 2013
An alarming act against nature conservation
27 February 2013
Allowing time for the constitution
20 February 2013
Regional policy
13 February 2013
Shànghǎi Hézuò Zǔzhī
6 February 2013
Labor unions and job security
30 January 2013
The Touareg
23 January 2013
Parliamentary inquiry commission on military coups and memorandums
16 January 2013
Conflict resolution
9 January 2013
A time tunnel to 2013
2 January 2013
Presidential system, not Constitution, on agenda
26 December 2012
Concentration of powers
19 December 2012
Brotherhood by homeland
12 December 2012
Empathy, justice, humility
5 December 2012
Environmental notes
28 November 2012
New functions for metropolitan municipalities
21 November 2012
Urban hardship
14 November 2012
‘We are alive; we survived’
7 November 2012
Debating GMOs
31 October 2012
Turkey’s place in a multi-speed Europe
24 October 2012
This time the EU has lingered on the agenda
17 October 2012
Europe’s peace
10 October 2012
Turkish military’s unending public legitimacy
3 October 2012
Solutions to conflicts will make agenda sooner or later
26 September 2012
Loyalty, voice and exit
19 September 2012
Any ideas about the meaning of war?
12 September 2012
Local refugee policy
5 September 2012
Foretastes from our new models
29 August 2012
National matrix
22 August 2012
Online freedom of expression
1 August 2012
Disarmament and art
25 July 2012
Inclusive and exclusive foreign policies
18 July 2012
Syriacs are full Turkish citizens
11 July 2012
What about a second time zone?
4 July 2012
Beating our history
27 June 2012
Inclusion of Kurdish language in education system
20 June 2012
Unattended Cyprus issue
13 June 2012
Development at any cost
6 June 2012
Anatolia’s recovery from amnesia
30 May 2012
A positive agenda
23 May 2012
Rather a systemic crisis
16 May 2012
This presidential system would lead Turkey to autocracy
9 May 2012
Turkish-French relations after Sarkozy
2 May 2012
France’s election
25 April 2012
After denial
18 April 2012
Time to settle all accounts with the military mentality
11 April 2012
The new investment incentive package
4 April 2012
Playing amongst ourselves
28 March 2012
Syrian refugees and the state of asylum policy
21 March 2012
Accidents and deaths in workplace are not destiny
14 March 2012
New constitution should be brought back to the agenda
7 March 2012
Turkey’s Armenian policy subcontracted to Azerbaijan?
29 February 2012
Ceausescus never die; neither do Bashars!
22 February 2012
Taksim Square and the Black Sea Highway
15 February 2012
New Arab actors versus fresh Cold War
8 February 2012
A new phase in demilitarization
1 February 2012
Consultation
25 January 2012
Dealing with national causes
18 January 2012
We shall keep on talking like Hrant
11 January 2012
Law of armed conflict
4 January 2012
2012: a difficult year that should motivate us
28 December 2011
Balance sheet after ‘Boyer Act’
21 December 2011
Saving the day by selling the future
14 December 2011
We are all in the same boat
7 December 2011
Russian restoration Act II
30 November 2011
Eurocynicism
23 November 2011
Recommence the speech where it ended
16 November 2011
Human development and Turkey’s rankings
9 November 2011
Yugoslavia 20 years ago
2 November 2011
Towards the multilateral conference on Cyprus
26 October 2011
Annotated agenda
19 October 2011
‘Kosovoization'?
12 October 2011
The week of the report
5 October 2011
‘You don’t make peace with your friends, do you?’
28 September 2011
Eastern Mediterranean fossil fuels: a lose-lose-lose scenario
...