A transitional period fight (1)
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 16 February 2012, Thursday 0 0 0 0
ETYEN MAHÇUPYAN
e.mahcupyan@todayszaman

A transitional period fight (1)

Turkey as a country is becoming increasingly difficult to understand. The reason for this is the emergence in the public sphere of societal dynamics that were previously invisible. These dynamics have begun to gain more and more political influence.

At the same time, this particular development took place during a period when the country’s most important political power, the bureaucracy, was going through an enormously turbulent period. In fact, we are really talking about a period and a process during which societal actors are searching out places for themselves within the bureaucracy and, at the same time, expanding their arenas while doing so.

In the past, it was possible to get an idea of where Turkey stood by simply focusing on the military and scrutinizing the relations between the elected government and the military. But our world is now filled with multiple actors. And then there is the presence of many sub-groups -- either trying to forge alliances with one another, or which are at odds with one another -- within the state and society. The general situation means that new analyses are necessary on a daily basis now, because it is nearly impossible to predict what tactical steps these sub-groups might take. The reality is, however, even more complicated than this because it is only an assumption we are making when we say these sub-groups are homogenous. In fact, a more realistic approach calls for us to base our calculations on the presumption that these sub-groups are not fully in control of their own inner structures, and that their political ventures overlap at many critical junctures.

In the end, we are forced to consider that we inhabit a country whose legal foundation is in fact very weak, a country crumbling under the force of a wave like that of the Kurdish issue, a wave strong enough to shake the state itself. It was against this backdrop that the attempt by prosecutors to open up investigations into some National Intelligence Agency (MİT) agents, including former and new undersecretaries, took place. It now appears that in the police report, which made its way to the prosecutor’s office, there are allegations that MİT itself has maintained a presence in the illegal Kurdish Communities Union (KCK), and that it has supported this organization as well as working as an interlocutor between Abdullah Öcalan and the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) cadres in the Kandil Mountains. This allegation, which no doubt has a lot of truth to it, can be explained in two ways. The first is that MİT has knowingly staked out a place for itself within the ranks of the KCK with the ultimate objective of creating a substructure that will allow it to destroy the KCK. The second reasoning here is that a sub-group within MİT crossed the professional line in their relations with the KCK, and began acting according to some other sort of volition. It seems most likely that the truth lies in the middle. In other words, it appears that MİT’s operation to infiltrate the KCK wound up being used by a subset group within the ranks of MİT with its own aims in mind.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
9 May 2013
Of what use are ‘wise people'?
2 May 2013
What should the Armenians not do?
25 April 2013
Peace is easy, but settlement will take time
18 April 2013
State of second-hand smoking
11 April 2013
A good panel in Washington
4 April 2013
Paradox of democracy
28 March 2013
CHP no longer normal
20 March 2013
When peace becomes rational
14 March 2013
The secularists who are disturbed by peace
7 March 2013
Opportunities the West missed
28 February 2013
Educated ignorance
21 February 2013
Political veracity or political folly
14 February 2013
Dani Rodrik for the last time
7 February 2013
The Sledgehammer facts
31 January 2013
Dani Rodrik's facts
24 January 2013
Who conspired against Dani Rodrik?
17 January 2013
Maturation
10 January 2013
AKP peace via Öcalan
3 January 2013
What will happen to the new constitution?
27 December 2012
Ergenekon’s recent tactics
20 December 2012
With such a shabby opposition...
13 December 2012
Prime minister’s anesthetic effect
6 December 2012
A cliché from Europe
29 November 2012
The foundation for a solution
22 November 2012
PKK’s path and PM’s language
15 November 2012
Why is pro- Kurdish politics tainted with urgency?
8 November 2012
Place of EU in AK Party universe
1 November 2012
Is the CPJ Report fair?
24 October 2012
Structural prejudice
18 October 2012
The ‘harakiri’ era in the West
11 October 2012
Will Erdoğan and Gül really clash?
4 October 2012
Manipulation campaign and Balyoz
27 September 2012
What does the freedom of expression protect?
23 September 2012
Freedom of expression and coexistence
13 September 2012
Limit of soft power
6 September 2012
The Kurdish people face forced normalization
30 August 2012
Political insensitivities all around
23 August 2012
PKK detaches from reality
16 August 2012
Some paradoxes
9 August 2012
Is Gül an alternative?
2 August 2012
Why is the prime minister being provocative?
26 July 2012
The era of soft neo-nationalism at the CHP
19 July 2012
Realpolitik in the Kurdish issue
12 July 2012
Religious Affairs Directorate on brink of illegitimacy
5 July 2012
Last chance, but for who?
28 June 2012
Limits of soft power
21 June 2012
The AKP’s new republic
14 June 2012
A new center?
7 June 2012
Reunion of values
31 May 2012
Ode to inconsistency
24 May 2012
Anatomy of a deadlock
17 May 2012
Towards a semi-presidential system?
10 May 2012
The way out for the new constitution
3 May 2012
A headscarved woman at the April 24 commemoration
26 April 2012
Responsibility towards history
19 April 2012
A final blow to tutelage
12 April 2012
From ‘Bayrak’ to ‘Balyoz’: Society finally calls spade a spade
5 April 2012
Loophole in EP report
29 March 2012
A few days in Brussels
22 March 2012
Why did the Kurdish issue evolve into a deadlock?
15 March 2012
Does the AKP want a new constitution?
8 March 2012
Did AKP become pro-status quo?
1 March 2012
An opportunity for the AKP to become a ‘master’
23 February 2012
An instructive crisis
17 February 2012
A transitional period fight (2)
16 February 2012
A transitional period fight (1)
9 February 2012
Why does the AKP still attract support?
2 February 2012
Hrant’s parasites
26 January 2012
The Uludere massacre as a political move
19 January 2012
The jester is naked
12 January 2012
Illegal acts are no longer normal
5 January 2012
A coup against the government from within
29 December 2011
The French bill and Armenians
22 December 2011
There will not be a recession in Turkey
15 December 2011
Why are the reforms stalled?
8 December 2011
The constitution of ‘new Muslims’
1 December 2011
The meaning of the Dersim apology
24 November 2011
AKP takes over the republic
17 November 2011
Turning points for Turkey’s religious people
10 November 2011
KCK operation and democracy’s nuances
3 November 2011
Humanity and racism in the aftermath of an earthquake
27 October 2011
Strategic suicide
20 October 2011
The Kurds’ Arab Spring
13 October 2011
Kurdish issue and social grounds
6 October 2011
How has Turkey become a global actor?
29 September 2011
Dissociation in the Kurdish issue
22 September 2011
Erdoğan’s secular opening
15 September 2011
Neo-Ottomanism
8 September 2011
‘Native aliens’ become citizens
1 September 2011
End of the story
25 August 2011
Breivik as a reflex
18 August 2011
The media's passive Breiviks
11 August 2011
The 'pluralist' scenario of the modernist delusion
4 August 2011
Resignation of the top military commanders
28 July 2011
Breivik's empathy
21 July 2011
PKK’s dilemma
14 July 2011
Turkey from a Western perspective
7 July 2011
Boycott policies
30 June 2011
A policy of crisis
23 June 2011
Dangerous reformer
...