France and the genocide issue
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 May 2013 Monday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 December 2011, Tuesday 0 0 0 0
BERİL DEDEOĞLU
b.dedeoglu@todayszaman.com

France and the genocide issue

The French parliament is about to vote on a bill that would criminalize speech that denies the killings of Armenians in 1915 was genocide. This is one of President Nicolas Sarkozy’s political maneuvers ahead of the 2012 presidential elections. He is not only seeking the support of the strong Armenian community in France, but also trying to revive the anti-Turkish feelings in his country’s public opinion.

Awakening Turkish public consciousness about the 1915 events is imperative because it has the potential to become one of the essential tools for political restructuring in Turkey and it is also an existential problem for the Turkish-Armenian community. The “genocide” debate is of crucial importance as it encourages us to face our own history, to expose the anti-democratic practices this country’s citizens had to suffer until now and it is also a way to discuss how to establish equality for all citizens of different ethnic and religious backgrounds. This issue is also critical for relations between Turks and Armenians and between Turkey and Armenia.

Adopting a law that makes the denial of the Armenian “genocide” punishable in French courts, however, will only make it harder to discuss this matter in Turkey on social and political levels. The pertinence of such a law in the context of freedom of thought and speech should also be discussed.

Pursuing the debate on the Armenian issue in Turkey is necessary because it opens the way for people to ask for a more just and transparent state. It also makes people notice how senseless it is to keep the Turkish-Armenian border closed and persist on an antagonistic policy toward a nation with which Turkey has lived together for centuries. However, foreign political interference, like France’s legislative initiative, do not encourage Turks at all to discuss this matter with a cool head. On the contrary, this law will only exacerbate ultranationalist rhetoric in Turkey by angering public opinion and by stimulating enmity towards both the French and the Armenians. In other words, the French law will not help Turks face their history and it will not fix Turkish-Armenian relations. Not only will the Turks become more nationalistic because of this debate’s electric atmosphere, the Armenians will, too. In brief, a law adopted in one country is not an effective way to normalize relations between two other countries or their peoples.

Those who prepared this bill are certainly aware of its devastating consequences. The “genocide” issue is of course just a cloak for them. France is simply trying to make Turkey toughen its stance and to provoke harsh reactions in order to show once again that Turkey does not belong in Europe. It’s true that an intransigent and bellicose image is not helpful for Turkey’s EU bid. This law is supplementary proof that the “genocide” issue and relations between Turkey and Armenia are simply diplomatic tools used for divergent purposes.

This new crisis between France and Turkey will seemingly cause extensive damage to bilateral relations. It’s odd that despite this sour ambiance France still attempts to win Turkish military procurement bids and to enter into the Turkish energy market. French businessmen are trying hard to win Turkey back, and their efforts are completely sabotaged by such initiatives. It is time to ask ourselves who is going to benefit from bad relations between France and Turkey. It is also legitimate to ask why some people in France are trying so enthusiastically to lose Turkey for good.

Is there anyone in France who believes that this law will make Turkey adopt a more humanistic or just stance regarding the Armenian issue or that it will in any way contribute to resolving any major diplomatic issue?

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
A trial in Germany
14 May 2013
The Reyhanlı attack and Europe
10 May 2013
Sounds from Turkey
7 May 2013
Israel's attacks against Syria
3 May 2013
Turbulent politics
30 April 2013
Trusting the European Union
26 April 2013
The peace process and sabotage
23 April 2013
Terrorism, Chechens and beyond
19 April 2013
Turkey: the land of fear and suspicion
16 April 2013
The Middle East and terror
12 April 2013
Peace-building as a challenge
9 April 2013
The Egyptian case
5 April 2013
The United States is in a hurry
2 April 2013
Fires in Germany
29 March 2013
The peace process and the details
26 March 2013
Turkey-Israel: a new process
22 March 2013
Intervening in Syria
19 March 2013
Cyprus-Turkey: a new period?
15 March 2013
Dealing with technical issues
12 March 2013
Upcoming elections in Iran
8 March 2013
After Hugo Chavez
5 March 2013
The global dimension of the leak
1 March 2013
The PKK and global balances
26 February 2013
An actor's choice
22 February 2013
New initiatives on Syria
19 February 2013
A challenging process
15 February 2013
Explosion at the border
12 February 2013
Peace negotiations and global circumstances
8 February 2013
Turkey-EU: a new debate
5 February 2013
Attacking the US Embassy
1 February 2013
Africa: the new chessboard
29 January 2013
Discrimination
25 January 2013
David Cameron and the EU
22 January 2013
Two journalists
18 January 2013
Attacking a university
15 January 2013
France-Turkey: new problems?
11 January 2013
Negotiating with terrorists
4 January 2013
‘We are so different that nobody understands us'
1 January 2013
Turkey-EU: A proposal from Britain?
28 December 2012
The need for transparency
25 December 2012
Student movements
21 December 2012
Risk assessment
18 December 2012
The EU’s Irish presidency
14 December 2012
A new look at Greece
11 December 2012
A new law for universities
7 December 2012
A real risk for Turkey
4 December 2012
Turkey-France: A new period?
30 November 2012
Israel-Turkey: New communication channels
27 November 2012
The Patriot issue
23 November 2012
US and Russia should open a new page
20 November 2012
Israel, Gaza and beyond
16 November 2012
US’s Israel test
13 November 2012
Reforming the United Nations
9 November 2012
US presidential election
6 November 2012
The other aspect of US elections
2 November 2012
The Middle East and nuclear proliferation
30 October 2012
Celebrating the republic
23 October 2012
Dialogue with terrorists
21 October 2012
From crisis to cooperation
16 October 2012
Brainstorming about the Middle East and Nobel
12 October 2012
A festival in Houston
9 October 2012
Terror and Europe
5 October 2012
The prime minister’s speech
2 October 2012
Palestine’s future
28 September 2012
Another way to negotiate?
25 September 2012
Discussing Muslims
21 September 2012
The Middle East quartet
18 September 2012
A movie and a trap
14 September 2012
Time to resuscitate the EU process?
11 September 2012
The presidential race in the US
7 September 2012
War scenarios between Iran and Israel
4 September 2012
Reforming education
31 August 2012
Turkey’s Syria problem
28 August 2012
Forgetting about the EU and beyond
24 August 2012
The global rivalry enters a new phase
21 August 2012
PKK’s strategy based on hatred
17 August 2012
The Syrian civil war
14 August 2012
Kidnapping a deputy
10 August 2012
Iran and Turkey’s role in Syria
7 August 2012
More deaths, alas
3 August 2012
The foreign minister’s visit to Arbil
31 July 2012
Two pieces of news, one option
27 July 2012
Domestic and international politics
24 July 2012
Can Israel intervene in Syria?
20 July 2012
Bloody Wednesday and Syria
17 July 2012
Democracy, constitution and beyond
13 July 2012
Amnesty International’s report on China
10 July 2012
Visiting the patriarchate
6 July 2012
People, governments and Turkey
3 July 2012
The Erdoğan-Zana meeting
29 June 2012
Russia’s weight in the Syrian problem
26 June 2012
Change in eastern Mediterranean balances
22 June 2012
Those who try to bring the past back
19 June 2012
Maliki, Talabani and new problems
15 June 2012
A methodological problem with coup trials
12 June 2012
The new period in France
8 June 2012
The government-opposition summit
5 June 2012
Is there a risk of ‘going back’?
1 June 2012
The richness of plurality, impossibility of uniformity
29 May 2012
Individuals as pillars of democracy
...