Mubarakization of Turkish generals
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
22 May 2013 Wednesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 04 August 2011, Thursday 0 0 0 0
ALİ H. ASLAN
a.aslan@todayszaman.com

Mubarakization of Turkish generals

Former Egyptian autocrat Hosni Mubarak’s appearance in court this week was dramatic. A powerful leader who once tried “caging” his people is now literally in a cage himself.

In a sense, Turkey’s autocratic-minded generals share a similar fate. Once unchecked and barely accountable, many military officers are now being “caged” by Turkish courts, thanks to a recently empowered democracy. The charge: viciously plotting against the people, their elected leaders and government.

If the suspects were from the Swedish military or something, one might have given them the benefit of the doubt. However, recent history provides us with a lot of reasons to be suspicious, to say the least. After the 1960 coup, for instance, a military-orchestrated court sentenced Turkey’s classy, Kennedy-like Prime Minister Adnan Menderes and two Cabinet members to death based on fabricated evidence for “treason.” Thousands of Turks (and Kurds alike) endured persecution and torture during the 1971 and 1980 military interventions. In 1997, Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan stepped down due to pressure by generals, supported by like-minded civilians in the state and the society. A systematic witch-hunt followed in the name of the struggle against “irtica” (Islamic reactionaries).

It is conceivable that many officers have been craving to do similar things in the 2000s, after Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s Justice and Development Party (AK Party) took over power via democratic elections. The AK Party is not so popular among military brass, mainly because its leadership comes from a pious background. Interestingly, during this decade of internal Cold War in Turkey, one of the anti-civilian operations was code-named the “Cage Action Plan,” according to credible evidence gathered by able Turkish police officers and prosecutors. The alleged military plan involved clandestine attacks on Turkey’s non-Muslim minority to undermine the international legitimacy of Erdoğan’s government. Fortunately, such sadistic plans were thwarted and the alleged masterminds are now undergoing a series of trials. The lesson: Don’t you dare cage your own people; you might be caged yourself one day.

The Turkish nation has reached a  higher level of democratization not by rioting in squares like Tahrir, but by flocking to ballot boxes. Last September 58 percent said “yes” in a referendum for constitutional amendments, which -- among other things -- made it possible to prosecute the leaders of the 1980 coup. The pro-reform AK Party garnered an unprecedented 50 percent of the vote in the June elections. Their political campaign has included promises to go after anti-democratic elements.

In reaction to the ongoing trials, which involve a large number of high-ranking military officers, a few top generals resigned last week. It’s good they don’t resort to violence anymore when they disagree with the civilian government. However, like Mubarak, military suspects will likely continue to deny any wrongdoings until the last minute, as if they have a clean human rights record.

The Mubarakization of Turkish military officers is not only about the way it all ends. It’s also about the way it all started. Some domestic and international circles have practically elevated generals to a “Mubarak” status, which means “blessed” in Arabic. Just like the Mubarak regime, a staunchly secularist and pro-Western quasi-military regime in Turkey has been useful especially for the United States and Israel. For the sake of the Cold War and containing Islamic movements within Turkey, the anti-democratic sins of Turkish officers were usually overlooked. Spoilt by Americans’ fascination and lucrative defense contracts, some generals had their way until recently. Hence, it is no surprise that skepticism runs high in Washington vis-à-vis Ergenekon-type investigations and trials. Americans will not abandon their friends in the Turkish military until the vessel completely sinks. Just like they did with Mubarak.

Washington was surprised with the Arab Spring, which took a heavy toll on Egypt’s Mubarak regime. They had little idea about the transformative social forces that made the revolution possible. Developments in Turkey are met with similar confusion. The American foreign policy elite still cannot grasp the power of transformative currents in the country. How can all-powerful generals be successfully forced into staying away from politics? Can Turkish democracy really survive with a disgruntled military? The predominant role of the pious in Turkey’s process of civilianization only fuels concerns held by Washington’s establishment in the wake of 9/11-boosted Islamophobia and lingering orientalism. What if, like they fear will happen in Egypt, so called “Islamists” take over the state? If they are not checked and balanced by the military, who can stop them, given the shortcomings of the secularist opposition parties such as the Republican People’s Party (CHP)? Is Turkey’s democratization in the US’s interest when Washington’s traditional friends in the military, media, business sector, etc., are gradually losing power?

With such questions, concerns and challenges in mind, Washington has heartburns whenever Turkey comes up nowadays. Americans might have less and less leverage in the country, unless they establish good ties with major transformative elements, whose relatively more Islamic outlook and lifestyle are not so culturally appealing to Westerners. Plus, they don’t want to irritate their good old secularist friends too much. The Pentagon cares about its foreign interlocutors and the White House cares about the Pentagon. The civilian government led by Erdoğan is not necessarily a darling of the US government and vice versa. As a result, unlike Brussels, Washington refrains from openly and loudly saying that they support “civilian supremacy” over the military’ in Turkey.

Turkey’s civilianization is undergoing a process of reform, not a revolution. The US supports it reluctantly from the sidelines. Time will tell whether keeping such a low profile will pay off. It wasn’t easy for America to let Mubarak go. It will certainly not be easy to let the Turkish generals and their civilian comrades go. My advice: If you can’t beat the Turkish Spring or are unable to join it now, you better get prepared for the days when you will have to jump the old boat no matter what. Believe me; those days are getting closer and closer.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
14 May 2013
Details of White House visit
20 March 2013
Turkish American ‘balance alignment'
5 March 2013
Vicious cycle with Israel and the US
22 January 2013
Obama's oath and the lopsided tango in Iraq
25 April 2012
Will America's attitude on Feb. 28 last 1,000 years?
16 March 2012
US-Turkey cycle on Syria
2 March 2012
Does the Gülen movement securitize the Kurdish question?
13 February 2012
Why does Davutoğlu attract great attention in the US?
17 November 2011
Old world paranoia
3 November 2011
41 times maşallah!
15 September 2011
Turkey-Israel tension: High stakes for US
18 August 2011
Turkey’s need for mature discussion about US
4 August 2011
Mubarakization of Turkish generals
19 June 2011
Old Turkey dying, US must let go
7 June 2011
US misses out on ‘Turkish Spring'
19 May 2011
Hizmetophobia: A by-product of the Turkish Muslim Spring
12 May 2011
A recipe for an invincible US
16 April 2011
How about press freedom at the State Department?
12 March 2011
Shame on the Republican Party
7 January 2011
Another ride with ‘holocoaster’?
11 December 2010
Entrapment
23 October 2010
A recipe to overcome US-Turkish hurdles
22 September 2010
The 58 percent factor in Washington
16 September 2010
Washington must drink some ayran
10 August 2010
An American victory: a mosque near Ground Zero
5 June 2010
The law of unintended consequences
29 May 2010
New US strategy, old habits
15 May 2010
The rise of Turkish Americans
30 April 2010
A misguided crusade against pious Turks in the US
11 March 2010
Inside a ‘hyphenated-American’ war
23 January 2010
Israel and Turkey: a difficult couple
2 January 2010
Obama's intelligence surplus
29 December 2009
Ambassador Tan: The right choice for Washington
25 December 2009
Is US complicit in non-Muslim sufferings in Turkey?
19 December 2009
Erdoğan’s message to the Jewish lobby
27 November 2009
Murky American minds, murky Turkey
27 November 2009
Murky American minds, murky Turkey
14 November 2009
The Hasan murders and the US immune system
11 November 2009
Zero problems with minorities?
31 October 2009
When will the US be honest with the Turkish military?
22 October 2009
Turkish-Armenian dialogue initiative by Harvard University
2 July 2009
Tendencies and opportunities in Washington
15 June 2009
How many more Watergates?
10 May 2009
NATO and freedom in Turkey
24 January 2009
Why do I feel freer?
19 January 2009
The Bush torture is finally over
10 January 2009
G(Ross) mistake?
3 January 2009
Why is Obama silent on Gaza?
27 December 2008
America's crisis,public spirit and Obama
20 December 2008
Apology (in)ability
13 December 2008
Recommendation season
22 November 2008
Beware of crisis builders
12 November 2008
What awaits the Obama administration
8 November 2008
Congratulations, America
1 November 2008
Expectations
24 October 2008
Powell's America must win
18 October 2008
Turkish military: a win-win scenario
11 October 2008
Obsession
4 October 2008
Palin: a bigger disaster than the economy?
6 September 2008
Under the Bush shadow
30 August 2008
Obama and McCain as commanders-in-chief
22 August 2008
Bumping into Turkey somewhere down the road
12 July 2008
Hard Turkey or soft Turkey?
27 June 2008
Turkey’s soul and the US soul
21 June 2008
From Guantanamo to US elections
13 June 2008
How to deal with Turkey’s bureaucratic sovereigns
6 June 2008
Obama and change
31 May 2008
Gone with the wave
9 May 2008
Israeli-Syrian peace test
25 April 2008
Tested by time
18 April 2008
Turkey’s American prosecutors
11 April 2008
Don’t be afraid, US: Talk
4 April 2008
No more freedom of persecution
28 March 2008
Convictions in Ankara and Washington
21 March 2008
Look Turkey, think about Iraq
14 March 2008
Sins and elections
7 March 2008
Has the Pentagon lost its mind?
29 February 2008
Why all the noise?
22 February 2008
Welcoming religious diplomacy
15 February 2008
Guantanamo forever?
8 February 2008
Bad news for Erdoğan?
1 February 2008
Sense and senselessness
25 January 2008
How about Turkey’s Rosa Parks?
18 January 2008
Good shepherd, bad shepherd
11 January 2008
US, Turkey: Keep communication alive
28 December 2007
Angles and tangles
7 December 2007
Playing ‘Deal or no deal’ with Iran
30 November 2007
Judge Bush?
23 November 2007
Thanksgivings and misgivings
16 November 2007
What to expect from Annapolis?
9 November 2007
Impressed upon
2 November 2007
Act now, or…
26 October 2007
In-actionable unintelligence
19 October 2007
Losers in the congressional saga
5 October 2007
Senseless of Congress
28 September 2007
With an enemy like Ahmadinejad
14 September 2007
The biggest challenge to the US
7 September 2007
War of reports
31 August 2007
Turkish foreign policy in the new era
24 August 2007
Time for a plan B over ‘genocide’
...