Caught unprepared for peace (1)
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 11 May 2011, Wednesday 0 0 0 0
MARKAR ESAYAN
m.esayan@todayszaman.com

Caught unprepared for peace (1)

As you know, when World War II came to an end, some of the Japanese war units, especially those located on islands in the Pacific, continued fighting for some time. These units, which knew nothing about the end of the war, kept on dying and killing although the war had come to an official end.

The Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) was formed in the wake of the destructive effects of the Sept. 12 coup because it rejected the Kurdish reality. Some of the torture inflicted by coup supporters on people, especially at Diyarbakır Prison, caused great resentment. The paradigm spouted by the leader of the coup supporters, Kenan Evren, was that “the Kurds are not a separate people, and thus there is no Kurdish problem.” This paradigm was linked with the banning of Kurdish as a language, all sorts of violations of human rights, the burning-down of villages and the scapegoating of legal Kurdish politics; what all of this did was make violence the only accepted and used language. The PKK, during this period, began to distinguish itself as the most organized of the Kurdish groups around, and began to represent the Kurdish problem. So much so that alternative Kurdish political movements were left voiceless and illegitimate, seemingly in the middle of all of the violence. And as for the Kurdish people, they gave their support to this organization, which appeared to promise that it would protect people from the state. After all, the blood was already running in the streets.

These days, a significant number of Kurds attribute the greatest share in the general recognition of the Kurdish problem and the fact that the Turkish government has started a Kurdish initiative to the PKK itself. Whether or not you agree, this is the reality. Many Kurdish citizens still do not trust the state.

And thus, like the Japanese units that kept right on fighting after WWII was over, the Turks and the Kurds do not seem able to shrug off the spirit of war themselves. The problems may continue, and the steps taken on the Kurdish initiative may be insufficient, but they are not able to digest the idea that warring is not the way towards a solution, and thus, the situation is really tragic.

We are in a state of having been caught unprepared for peace. We have fought so hard, been so exhausted and started to believe so deeply that the situation will never change that we never even consider that the struggle for rights can be carried on through vehicles other than violence. But the worst aspect of this all is that people are truly still dying, and we all live with the fear of hearing news about more deaths at any moment.

Alright, but in what is this all rooted?

The most important reality, and one which we cannot deny, is that we have in our midst an armed and violent organization, the PKK, which manages to carry on existing. No matter how much we distinguish the Kurdish problem from the PKK problem, this particular reality follows the Kurdish problems around and has considerable influence. A group accustomed to keeping arms at hand cannot become integrated into politics, nor can it take the steps necessary to refrain from considering arms as an option. At the same time, just as there are no truly meaningful offers being made to the PKK other than “turn yourselves in,” the PKK also possesses a strong vein that wishes to see the war continue. This is really the correct perspective with which to view attacks in places such as Reşadiye, İskenderun, Dörtyol and Kastamonu.

Just as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has said himself on many occasions, the Kurdish initiative is essentially a political party trying to hold its own against a very deep-rooted and complicated problem. When the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) started this initiative, Prime Minister Erdoğan did not make statements like this. He seemed to have much more confidence on this front, believing fully that the problem could be solved. After all, he had very serious support from the people of the country behind him. But further than that, he knew that the time had really come for a solution, and he knew what needed to be done.

Erdoğan, in defining the problem itself, and in speaking openly about the mistakes made by the state on this issue, has taken great steps on the Kurdish problem front. The problem is no longer a taboo. It has become a problem that can now be solved by political solutions.

But just as Erdoğan has indicated, the AK Party, as a political party shouldering the Kurdish problem on its own, has been negatively affected on the vote front because of this venture. And thus, people in the AK Party ranks are beginning to think that it is rather unfair for the party to have to shoulder all the weight on its own. With the elections fast approaching, this weight has really become a source pressure for the AK Party, and in fact the Kurdish initiative has really petered out lately.

The third reason for the deep-rooted nature of this problem is that neither the Turks nor the Kurds have been able to mourn all the people they have lost, and at the same time, their anger has not been used up either. There have really been no meaningful steps taken in the direction of transcending emotional and psychological barriers. We have not done enough when it comes to rehabilitating the project and doing away with misinformation. Just think, the read on all the human losses and indescribable pain is completely opposite depending on whether you look at it from the east or the west of the nation. We talk about 50,000 people having died over 30 years of fighting. What this really means is hundreds of thousands. During the era of the dirty war, there were 5 million people in the region serving as soldiers. Countless people were seriously traumatized and have learned by heart that the other side is the enemy. Just as the Kurds are seen as the reason for the deaths in the official version of events in the west of Turkey, Kurds in the east see the state -- and by extension its owners, the Turks -- as responsible.

To tell people who believe their children died and were martyred for the state that, actually, this was nothing more than a family squabble, a fight between siblings and that this war did not have to take place, puts the weight of accounting for these losses on the shoulders of the state. And these are accounts that cannot be closed up in any other way than trying those responsible for certain acts that have taken place during this dirty and false war, by bringing about justice and by apologizing to the citizens of the nation.

And this, in turn, is precisely how it is that we have been caught unprepared for peace. Because really, it is not that we love war or anything. I will continue with this topic.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
National unity and solidarity
17 May 2013
No libretto for history?
15 May 2013
Why all this violence?
12 May 2013
Turkey has to grow up
10 May 2013
Polarization and deep state
8 May 2013
Turkey's dilemma
5 May 2013
Getting rid of this shame
3 May 2013
What happened in Taksim on May 1?
1 May 2013
Is 1915 genocide or what?
28 April 2013
My father
26 April 2013
It's now democratization's turn
24 April 2013
Exit from a well 1,915 meters deep
21 April 2013
How should the events of 1915 be perceived
19 April 2013
This is almost the end for Kılıçdaroğlu
17 April 2013
All that is solid melts into air
14 April 2013
Without creating new ‘others'
12 April 2013
Will anything good come from Muslims?
10 April 2013
The price CHP pays for its stance
7 April 2013
As the CHP is dragged towards euthanasia
3 April 2013
Significance of new constitution for Turkey
31 March 2013
Gökçeada Greek Primary School and ghosts from the past
29 March 2013
The butterfly effect of the solution
27 March 2013
Leyla Zana's contribution to peace
24 March 2013
Hizmet movement and the peace process
22 March 2013
As the poisonous parentheses close
20 March 2013
If there was no Ergenekon trial
18 March 2013
CHP, not Turkey, will be partitioned
15 March 2013
Redeeming democracy
13 March 2013
CHP and peace
10 March 2013
The big peace gong has not rung yet
6 March 2013
Chemistry of and roadblocks to solution
3 March 2013
The provocations that have come to nothing
1 March 2013
When will big peace come?
27 February 2013
Kurdish politics on a test drive
24 February 2013
Logic of peace
22 February 2013
Are we really getting closer to peace?
20 February 2013
Transformation of nationalism
17 February 2013
Kurds, Muslims and neo-nationalists
15 February 2013
The CHP's İmralı ‘correction'
13 February 2013
Baykal coup in the CHP
10 February 2013
The dignity of politics and the deep state
8 February 2013
Opportunity for urban transformation
6 February 2013
Getting rid of the straitjacket
3 February 2013
Problems exhausted too
1 February 2013
Turkey's CHP problem
30 January 2013
Turkish issue and the CHP
27 January 2013
Kılıçdaroğlu's choice
25 January 2013
Why can't we postpone the reforming of the state?
23 January 2013
Paris killings and their wake
20 January 2013
A tough week
18 January 2013
Dink case and democratization
16 January 2013
Post-PKK Turkey
13 January 2013
The PKK issue and provocations
11 January 2013
Supreme Court head prosecutor: Dink killed by an organization
9 January 2013
Tragedy in Zonguldak
6 January 2013
The new process
2 January 2013
While the deep state waits…
30 December 2012
Polarization and stability
28 December 2012
The state apparatus resurfaced
26 December 2012
What is deep state?
23 December 2012
Coup changes appearance
19 December 2012
Human rights struggle in the new age
16 December 2012
As the state tries itself
14 December 2012
Search for common sense in AK Party
12 December 2012
What were in those reports?
9 December 2012
Let us make sure history does not repeat itself
7 December 2012
Turkey in past decade and past week
5 December 2012
The Kurdish issue and populism
2 December 2012
Turkey: a country of paradoxes
30 November 2012
What is Turkey’s role in the imminent comeback of the East?
28 November 2012
Why can’t we make a new constitution?
25 November 2012
Özal: Once again
23 November 2012
Where does Kenan Evren’s self-confidence come from?
21 November 2012
Gaza and three possibilities
18 November 2012
Price of delay: paid
16 November 2012
Mastering time and price of delay
14 November 2012
Death penalty debate and questions
11 November 2012
Golden Age or Stone Age?
9 November 2012
Key to a victory: politics of non-deception
7 November 2012
A radical package
4 November 2012
Özal and the Kurdish issue
2 November 2012
Changing the factory settings: thoughts on the AK Party and the Turkish Republic
31 October 2012
Continued reforms or chaos?
28 October 2012
Hunger strikes and political constriction
24 October 2012
Link between economy and democracy
21 October 2012
Murder of Christian missionaries and the deep state
19 October 2012
The importance of coup trials
17 October 2012
Why is EU membership important?
14 October 2012
We could have shared the Nobel
12 October 2012
EU progress report and recent times in Turkey
10 October 2012
A deus ex machina: Recep Güven
7 October 2012
No to war… but
5 October 2012
Turkish foreign policy and Syria
3 October 2012
Differences between two speeches
30 September 2012
Turkey's red lines
26 September 2012
Post Balyoz, pressure mounts on Court
23 September 2012
Turkey's future and the Balyoz decision
21 September 2012
Turkey’s military problem
19 September 2012
Kılıçdaroğlu’s Menderes visit
16 September 2012
Film provocation as the East returns
...