Discourse on drafting new constitution may push AK Party over 50 percent
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
19 May 2013 Sunday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 24 March 2011, Thursday 0 0 0 0
MEHMET KAMIŞ
m.kamis@todayszaman.com

Discourse on drafting new constitution may push AK Party over 50 percent

There are only a few months left before the elections.

As they prepare for the elections, which are extremely important for the ongoing change and renovation in the country, the political parties seem to be satisfied with the results of pre-election surveys. Still, it is highly beneficial for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) to explain its objectives for its next government term more clearly and build its election strategy accordingly.

To cut a long story short, it should take the lead in drafting a new constitution and fine-tuning efforts to expand the civilian sphere, as the general public expects them to do. As the elections near, the public is waiting for the government to develop and declare a clear discourse on the matter.

One major actor that may affect the election is undoubtedly the outlawed Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). As it did in the run-up to previous elections, it will try to increase tension in the country and mobilize reactionary voters through provocative actions. Indeed, Bengi Yıldız and Sebahat Tuncel of the pro-Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) confirmed this with their actions during Nevruz festivities. This is because the PKK and its political extensions are among the groups most disturbed by a change in the status quo.

The Republican People’s Party’s (CHP) -- or more correctly, its leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu’s -- main goal is beating former leader Deniz Baykal in the elections. That is why he makes election promises that ring a “populist” tune, as they are made without much premeditation. In other words, he gives the impression that he is trying to secure as many votes as possible, knowing that he will not be elected to office.

Nevertheless, the CHP’s move for paid military service, however controversial it may be, was a very good one. It was against the wishes of the military, which the CHP has never criticized, backing it up at every opportunity. This development in itself represents a significant step toward the expansion of the civilian sphere in the country.

But we must actually talk about what the ruling AK Party’s election strategy should be. Being confined to the terms imposed on it by the opposition will be to the disadvantage of the AK Party. Therefore, it must place greater and renewed emphasis on a new and modern constitution to earn the sympathy of groups “otherified” by the state. Only in this way can it win the hearts of the victims of the so-called liberal Constitution of 1961, as well as the later coup Constitution of 1982, which minimized public sovereignty and established tutelary institutions. In other words, the general public expects the AK Party to promise a more modern, freer and more advanced country to the “otherified” groups of this country, including Alevis, Kurds, leftists and actually all citizens in the country, and to keep that promise.

Everyone, albeit some reluctantly, agrees that the AK Party has undertaken great projects during its nine years in office. Turkey has made great strides in economic terms. Six zeros were removed from the national currency and inflation is largely under control. Overall, the level of country’s economic welfare has significantly increased. Major infrastructure projects were completed. The majority of the highways were transformed into divided multi-lane roads, etc.

Turkey enjoys increased influence both in its region and across the globe. Important steps have been taken in respect to expanding the civilian sphere. The referendum held on Sept. 12 was a historic turning point which witnessed an overwhelming “yes” in elections. The AK Party has undoubtedly acted as a driving force for these developments.

Given all this, I believe that the AK Party must now bring all these efforts for democratization to a successful conclusion, resting its entire strategy on the project of drafting a new constitution and starting debates on this project. If this is not done, Turkey may see another 1993 situation, God forbid. As you will recall, late Prime Minister Turgut Özal, elected to office after the military rule of Sept. 12, undertook important steps toward democratization, but he died, possibly through assassination, in 1993 and the deep state made sure to undo everything he had accomplished.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
12 December 2012
Auditing and public conscience
6 June 2012
20 years ago, 10 years later
5 June 2011
CHP-BDP brotherhood
21 April 2011
Oligarchic bureaucracy is carrying out an operation via YSK
16 April 2011
Period of political mastery
31 March 2011
A historic opportunity before the prime minister
24 March 2011
Discourse on drafting new constitution may push AK Party over 50 percent
24 February 2011
Time to say ‘stop’ to terror conspiracies
12 February 2011
Concerned moderns
7 February 2011
The Middle East is finally finding itself 100 years later
29 January 2011
A plastic bottle or sorrow for loss of a son
8 January 2011
Does this hand of darkness not scare you?
25 December 2010
The ill-intentions of the BDP
27 November 2010
CHP-BDP Alliance
13 November 2010
What would you do if your child was there?
6 November 2010
Who is behind the Taksim bomb?
30 October 2010
Who really conceded goals in the Germany-Bosnia match?
3 October 2010
The fate of the CHP
31 July 2010
Being undecided during a historic turning point
24 July 2010
Where words come to a standstill
26 June 2010
What has changed in 26 years?
12 June 2010
Blood brothers
5 June 2010
Turkish passport
22 May 2010
Long referendum process and Öcalan’s statements
15 May 2010
Should it be like this?
8 May 2010
Where are Armenian intellectuals?
17 April 2010
BDP, status quo giving each other the glad eye
3 April 2010
Being a part of the ‘no’ front
27 March 2010
A choice between proponents of change and status quo
20 March 2010
Either the state or a raven’s carcass
6 March 2010
A historic confession
27 February 2010
CHP to face trouble when it goes abroad
13 February 2010
Wounds that can’t self-heal
19 January 2010
Germany at work trying to repair its damaged image in Turkey
9 January 2010
Keeping abreast of a changing Turkey
2 January 2010
Coup museum
20 December 2009
Vaccination against established order: Terror
9 December 2009
What was our mistake in Switzerland?
6 December 2009
İzmir, İzmir
21 November 2009
It wasn’t a slip of the tongue for Öymen
31 October 2009
Enough of road stories, get to the murder
24 October 2009
A Middle East peace will suit Jewish interests the most
17 October 2009
The paradigm’s collapse
10 October 2009
Glass walls
3 October 2009
The spear will not fit into the sack
19 September 2009
…And then the day came when you, too, needed the law!
5 September 2009
The war between the status quo and change
22 August 2009
Caesar’s right
15 August 2009
Politics over blood
8 August 2009
Please, do not stop pursuing the murderers
1 August 2009
Hizb ut-Tahrir Drama Corp.
27 July 2009
Why would the HSYK not want the KCK to end?
18 July 2009
A HSYK that is against the law in Turkey
4 July 2009
Shall we stand guard with baseball bats as well?
27 June 2009
Another office in İstanbul is needed for Islamophobia
20 June 2009
How many games have been played over the Alevis?
6 June 2009
Last week in Arbil
30 May 2009
When did the military’s codes change?
23 May 2009
Politicized judiciary wants president to stand trial
16 May 2009
What does the army do in Turkey?
9 May 2009
Baykal takes one step forward, two steps back
2 May 2009
Constitutional Court President Kılıç’s speech on Turkey’s ‘autoimmunity’
29 April 2009
To be terror or to be government
18 April 2009
Why did the chief of general staff talk?
11 April 2009
Terror disguised in beards and cloaks
21 March 2009
The end of Feb. 28 in Turkey and the world
28 February 2009
DTP is fueling the fire of the ‘strict supporters’
21 February 2009
What a photo tells us
7 February 2009
The law of incompatibility in the Middle East
31 January 2009
I applaud the prime minister of the Turkish Republic
24 January 2009
The octopus called Ergenekon
17 January 2009
Baykal al-Sahaf
10 January 2009
Ahmed from Gaza
3 January 2009
If security is at issue, life has no value
20 December 2008
Apologizing to the Armenians
6 December 2008
Global terror from India to Turkey
29 November 2008
Western hypocrisy on Armenian issue
25 November 2008
From Ertuğrul Günay’s remarks to urbanization policy
8 November 2008
Sad homeland Germany!
1 November 2008
The public and oligarchy
25 October 2008
The fatal virus spreading in Anatolia
16 October 2008
No more beating people with the state’s stick
11 October 2008
An open letter to the PKK
7 October 2008
Message of terror goes to chief of general staff
27 September 2008
The deaths of others
13 September 2008
Never without confronting Sept. 12
6 September 2008
Abdullah Gül’s hand extended for peace!
30 August 2008
Baykal gets impolite treatment
23 August 2008
Is the PKK trying to fill in for Ergenekon?
18 August 2008
CHP unable to accept that Turkey is a modern and contemporary country
2 August 2008
Constitutional Court too powerful
26 July 2008
Will Karadzic’s punishment absolve Europe of its sins?
19 July 2008
Or do they not want unsolved murders to be solved?
12 July 2008
Terror companies
5 July 2008
Sept. 12, Hudson, Eruygur: always the same scenario
21 June 2008
Saving science from the hands of rectors
7 June 2008
Institutional kingdom
31 May 2008
What if the Ottomans had Turkish schools?
24 May 2008
Judiciary
17 May 2008
Deep status quo, deep PKK
...