The end of bunga bunga politics?
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 May 2013 Monday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 March 2011, Sunday 0 0 0 0
ANDREW FINKEL
a.finkel@todayszaman.com

The end of bunga bunga politics?

We’ve all said it once. In fact, we’ve said it so many times that we are peacock-blue in the face. In a democracy, it takes two to tango and it doesn’t help one little bit if Turkey’s opposition has spent nearly a decade trying to dance the fandango with its shoelaces untied. It is not that the government is gripped by the arrogance of power, it is that it suffers from the over-confidence of those who rule unopposed.

One can’t really expect more from the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP). Its appeal, almost by definition, is to its own particular tribe. This is not to say that there aren’t some sensible people on the team or even that the party is still caught in the street gang politics of the 1970s. It’s just that its room for maneuver is limited. The moment it moves too far towards the political center, that place where most of the votes are to be had, it becomes invisible -- a party without umph. A moderate nationalist is like a vegan vampire or a business consultant given to self-doubt. If you don’t rant at Kurdish television or shake your fist at Brussels, you appear to lack conviction. So the question for the coming election is not whether the MHP can form a government, but whether they can get over the 10 percent threshold to win any seats at all. What would help them most is some terrible event that would help polarize public opinion, and frankly that isn’t much of a recommendation in their favor.

The real culprits, of course, are the Republican People’s Party (CHP), who have the history and even the potential to make them a real genuine alternative. Alas, they saddled themselves with a credibility problem as big as their former leader’s ego. Under Deniz “Bunga Bunga” Baykal, the party took a strange turn indeed. It is as if it was set to turn back the clock to before 1972, when Bülent Ecevit became its leader with a “left of center” message that was meant to address the demands of a society caught in the throes of urbanization -- for a new and better life. Instead Mr. Baykal went into denial and tried to turn the CHP into the citadel of state power. He did not so much oppose the Justice and Development (AK) party, so much as refute their right to exist. This never gave him much chance to figure out why they were getting more votes than himself. And he never thought of resigning and never gave the party a chance to bring in fresh blood.

The CHP under new management has not exactly hit the ground running. Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, the disgraced Mr. Baykal’s successor, has been able to distance himself from the backroom style of politics for which the CHP had become notorious. Yet Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu appears to possess one important quality Mr. Baykal lacked. He wants to see his party win the election. To this end, his party has actually started producing not just policies, but policies that may even win it votes. Only this week the CHP has taken a hard look at the thing that obsesses every Turkish male once they come of legal age -- the obligation to do compulsory military service. Turkey does not need such a large standing army and for many the time spent in uniform is a wasteful distraction from their future careers. In the past, people have been able to buy an exemption to do a reduced stint, but this is clearly unjust. So with a bit of lateral thinking the CHP has come up with a scheme which would allow people to do an abbreviated tour of duty not by forking out a whacking fee but what they can afford.

OK. It’s not a revolution but it is a start. For those who cry “foul,” saying that it is a bit of pre-election populism, that is exactly what it is. But it is not irresponsible and it has made the government flinch. As for the electorate, perhaps they may come to like the idea of political parties actually competing for their vote.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
27 March 2011
Whose model is it anyway?
24 March 2011
Front-page news
22 March 2011
Libya and the fashionable vice
20 March 2011
The end of bunga bunga politics?
17 March 2011
A nuclear melody
15 March 2011
A story in search of a moral
13 March 2011
Ergenekon cooks with pomegranates
10 March 2011
A sense of hurt
8 March 2011
Justice on trial
6 March 2011
Scary stuff
3 March 2011
Whither Turkey now?
1 March 2011
Necmettin Erbakan
27 February 2011
Building a political base
24 February 2011
Ten years on
22 February 2011
Europe, MENA and the biggest fish
20 February 2011
How many wrongs make a right?
17 February 2011
The deep state changes its image
15 February 2011
Sex, drugs, the crocus and a bee
13 February 2011
Pınar Selek
10 February 2011
Kanal 84
8 February 2011
‘Do as I say’
6 February 2011
Coffee break
3 February 2011
Dominoes versus okey
1 February 2011
Right makes might and vice versa
30 January 2011
The politics of everyday life
27 January 2011
The murder of İstanbul
25 January 2011
How to win the next election
23 January 2011
Points on the political compass
20 January 2011
What a robust Turkey brings to the table
18 January 2011
Welcome to political hell
16 January 2011
Turkey’s greatest threat
13 January 2011
Hrant Dink and Gabrielle Giffords
11 January 2011
Whose history is it anyway?
9 January 2011
Tweeting for God and country
6 January 2011
The headscarf and Kurdish rights
4 January 2011
Third Bosporus bridge? Transport for lemmings
2 January 2011
Zero problems with bags
30 December 2010
And the winner is…
28 December 2010
Man or Woman of the Year
26 December 2010
Sarah, Orhan Pamuk and Europe
23 December 2010
Chipping away at the government’s lead
21 December 2010
CHP shoots an arrow in the air
19 December 2010
Uncovering Komitas
16 December 2010
A democratic election?
14 December 2010
Bad vibrations
12 December 2010
An organization in search of a logo
9 December 2010
Fire-fighting diplomacy
7 December 2010
Leaking accountability
5 December 2010
WikiLeaks in Turkey -- Cui bono?
2 December 2010
Wikileakioğlu
30 November 2010
WikiLeaks: a strange interlude
28 November 2010
The calligrapher’s art -- then and now
25 November 2010
Creeping past the threshold
23 November 2010
The Boron Syndrome
21 November 2010
Turkey do’s and Turkey don’ts
16 November 2010
A NIMBY approach to Ergenekon
14 November 2010
Ruminations on ruminants
11 November 2010
The president gets a prize
9 November 2010
Beltwayology
7 November 2010
We resemble ourselves
4 November 2010
The bomb in Taksim Square
2 November 2010
A columnist bites the dust
28 September 2010
The Stuxnet Worm turns
26 September 2010
Tophane
23 September 2010
Turkey’s Ground Zero
21 September 2010
The Hrant Dink Award
19 September 2010
Referendum 2010 (it’s how you play the game)
14 September 2010
The morning after
12 September 2010
The referendum and Sunday lunch
9 September 2010
Dead cats can bounce
7 September 2010
Yes or no
5 September 2010
İstanbul 1910, European Capital of Change
2 September 2010
Referendum: no longer a done deal
31 August 2010
The great smear
29 August 2010
Asil Nadir -- a moral tale
26 August 2010
Yes, Minister
24 August 2010
Accountability, the referendum and Lame-Brain Pete
15 August 2010
Referendum risk
12 August 2010
‘No, No, Recep’
10 August 2010
The reform paradigm
8 August 2010
It’s (almost) too darn hot
5 August 2010
A referendum on what?
3 August 2010
Turkey through the looking glass
1 August 2010
Change Turkey can believe in?
29 July 2010
Cameron comes to town
27 July 2010
Analyze this
25 July 2010
The new Turkey
22 July 2010
Recovering in time for elections
20 July 2010
Giving the Kurdish question an answer
18 July 2010
İstancool (And not Constantinople)
15 July 2010
St. Augustine and Turkey’s opposition
13 July 2010
İstanbul, UNESCO and paving paradise
11 July 2010
A tutorial on tutelage
8 July 2010
What about the Kurds?
6 July 2010
Houston, we’ve got zero problems
4 July 2010
A chat in a Brussels hotel
1 July 2010
The politics of resentment
29 June 2010
Turkey, Iran and regime change
27 June 2010
A sudden case of adolescence?
24 June 2010
The hard task of drawing the line in the sand
...