Democracy and the Arab World
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 24 January 2011, Monday 0 0 0 0
ÖMER TAŞPINAR
o.taspinar@todayszaman.com

Democracy and the Arab World

As the discussion continues about which country may be next after Tunisia, it is important to remember that the Arab world is not a monolith. We therefore need to compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges. It is certainly true that there is an Arab exceptionalism to democracy.

Out of the 22 countries in the Arab League, only Lebanon has regular elections. Yet, even there, chronic instability fights the image of a successful democracy. Why is there such an Arab exception to democracy? I don’t think culture or religion is the answer. There are many democracies in the Islamic world, after all. Turkey, Malaysia and Indonesia come to mind.

According to political scientists and political economists, there are structural impediments to democracy in the Arab world. One of them is the resource curse, sometimes also known as the “rentier state” theory. According to this school of analysis, if an underdeveloped country discovers that it has natural resources, its chances of becoming a democracy significantly diminish. The reason is the correlation between taxation and representation.

Let’s take the example of Saudi Arabia and oil. When an economically underdeveloped country discovers that it has oil, the public sector becomes the owner of the newfound wealth. The state owns the land and the energy sector. If the oil sector is large enough to dominate the economy, there is no longer any incentive to develop other sectors of the economy. Therefore, oil wealth comes at the expense of economic diversification and the development of a productive, competitive private sector. The country may get rich, as Saudi Arabia did. But this does not mean that it is productive and successful.

Perhaps more important is the connection between taxation and democracy. Is there any need for a rich state like Saudi Arabia, which owns the largest oil reserves in the world, to tax its people? The answer is “no.” The Saudi state has so much oil revenue that its fiscal balance does not depend on tax income. This is why there is no income tax in Saudi Arabia. And when a state has no need to tax its people, the most important part of the social contract that defines the democratic relationship between state and society is missing.

When citizens don’t pay taxes, they don’t develop a sense of civic consciousness or sense of ownership for their political system. There is no real driver for human and political rights when there is no responsibility. In other words, no taxation often leads to no representation. The Saudi state can safely assume that it can buy the loyalty of its citizens as long as it can economically provide for them.

The same dynamics that apply to Saudi Arabia are valid in most Arab states that have natural resources and use them as economic rent. The Gulf region, Libya and Algeria are all to some extent rentier states. But what about Arab states such as Jordan and Egypt, which do not have significant natural resources?

Most Arab states have strategic importance for the West, and particularly Washington, for two reasons: proximity to energy resources and proximity to Israel. Proximity to oil means revenue from the transportation of oil. Egypt has the Suez Canal, and many other countries such as Jordan have pipelines that produce revenue unrelated to economic productivity. It is the strategic importance of their geographic location that creates income. Most Arab states have workers in the Gulf and depend on the remittances of their citizens for their fiscal balance.

But perhaps most important is their ability to translate their relationship with Israel into cash. It is no coincidence that Egypt and Jordan are big recipients of foreign aid from the United States and Europe. They may not have energy rent but they receive strategic rent because of their strategic importance for peace in the Middle East. In that sense, foreign aid is just like oil. It creates unearned easy income, unrelated to economic productivity. And foreign aid also creates addiction and dependency, just like in the case of oil.

At the end of the day, oil rent and strategic rent explain why major parts of the Arab world did not develop like the West. Simply put, they were able to depend on easy income without genuine economic development, private sector growth, the emergence of an industrial bourgeoisie, a middle class and, most importantly, taxation and representation.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
Turkey-US: trading places
12 May 2013
Who is behind Reyhanlı ?
5 May 2013
Iraq is the real problem in Turkish-American relations
28 April 2013
Root causes of terrorism in Boston
21 April 2013
The timing of Turkey's Kurdish strategy
14 April 2013
The urgent versus the important in the Middle East
7 April 2013
The AKP paradox and the Kurdish question
31 March 2013
A new American approach to Syria?
24 March 2013
A good week for Turkey
17 March 2013
Turkey and the transatlantic alliance
10 March 2013
Iraq: 10 years after
3 March 2013
Anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism
24 February 2013
Better coordination needed between US, EU, Turkey
17 February 2013
America's self-inflicted economic problem
10 February 2013
Syria and the Congo in the eyes of Obama
3 February 2013
Turkish perceptions of the United States (2)
27 January 2013
Turkish perceptions of the United States (1)
20 January 2013
Turkey and Britain: privileged partners in the EU?
13 January 2013
Israeli elections, Iran and the US reaction
6 January 2013
From fiscal to political cliff
30 December 2012
America's China policy (II)
23 December 2012
America's China policy (1)
16 December 2012
Can Turkey be multicultural?
9 December 2012
America's Syria dilemma
2 December 2012
Turkey and Saudi Arabia: strange bedfellows in Syria
25 November 2012
A war with no winners
18 November 2012
The Middle East will not wait for Obama
11 November 2012
New Washington, old problems
4 November 2012
The Day After Scenarios in Washington
28 October 2012
No good option in Syria
21 October 2012
Final stretch in US elections
14 October 2012
The Syrian crisis and Turkey's credibility gap
7 October 2012
Washington's Syria policy viewed from Ankara
30 September 2012
US election and Turkey
23 September 2012
Turkey's image in the Western media
16 September 2012
The American public and the Islamic world
9 September 2012
Foreign policy in US elections
2 September 2012
The Arab Spring and the Kurdish Awakening
26 August 2012
Israel, Iran and the US elections
12 August 2012
Syria and US options
5 August 2012
Syrian lessons for Turkey
29 July 2012
The future of Turkish-Israeli relations
22 July 2012
Post-Assad Syria: civil war or harmony?
15 July 2012
Armenia-Turkey and 2015
8 July 2012
Washington’s Syria policy
1 July 2012
No good options with Syria and Iran
24 June 2012
Turkey’s Syria policy: What’s next?
17 June 2012
Understanding relative deprivation
10 June 2012
The root causes of Turkish anti-Americanism
4 June 2012
Syria, Europe and inaction
27 May 2012
A new phase in Syria?
20 May 2012
The story behind the story and US lobbies
13 May 2012
Austerity versus growth: a false debate
6 May 2012
Explaining Turkey's inaction in Syria
29 April 2012
Turkey’s strategic visions and Syria
22 April 2012
Turkey's Kurdish predicament
15 April 2012
Playing for time in Iran and Syria
8 April 2012
Turkish economy: between hard and soft landing
1 April 2012
Turkish-Iranian relations: engagement and rivalry
25 March 2012
The West and military tutelage in Egypt
18 March 2012
Syria and Iraq: Disturbing similarities
11 March 2012
Obama’s Iran dilemma
4 March 2012
Turkey’s options in Syria (II)
26 February 2012
Turkey’s options in Syria (I)
19 February 2012
The future of China (II)
12 February 2012
Time for Turkey to match words with deeds
5 February 2012
Turkey’s Syria dilemma
29 January 2012
The future of China (1)
22 January 2012
Double standards in dealing with deep state
15 January 2012
Will Turkey support sanctions against Iran?
8 January 2012
Turkish-Iranian solidarity in the Middle East?
1 January 2012
Europe's reaction to the Arab awakening
25 December 2011
Iraq and Syria are unraveling
19 December 2011
Taking stock in Iraq
11 December 2011
What’s next for Egypt?
4 December 2011
The zigzag in Turkish-American relations
27 November 2011
Turkey's illiberal democratization
21 November 2011
America's return to the Pacific
13 November 2011
The anatomy of the European debt crisis
30 October 2011
Turkey’s cyclical appeal as a model
23 October 2011
The PKK and the Kurds
16 October 2011
Is the EU still relevant for Turkey?
9 October 2011
The US-Pakistan crisis
2 October 2011
Obama and the democratic base
25 September 2011
A successful visit to New York
18 September 2011
Turkey and Israel: Divergence because of resemblance?
11 September 2011
Time to focus on the Kurdish question
5 September 2011
Deciphering Israel’s behavior
21 August 2011
Darkening clouds over Turkey
14 August 2011
The Saudi reaction to Syria
7 August 2011
The Arab Spring and the duality of the Turkish model
31 July 2011
Civil military relations and the roots of the Kurdish problem (2)
24 July 2011
The roots of Turkey’s Kurdish challenge (1)
17 July 2011
The Kurdish question and the AKP
10 July 2011
The Turkish model and the Arab world (2)
3 July 2011
The Turkish model and the Arab world (1)
26 June 2011
Foreign policy challenges after AKP’s victory (2)
19 June 2011
Foreign policy challenges after AKP’s victory (1)
12 June 2011
Post-election Turkey and the Kurdish challenge
5 June 2011
Turkish elections and Washington ( 2)
...