The nature of the beast and of the CHP
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 June 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 20 May 2010, Thursday 0 0 0 0
ANDREW FINKEL
a.finkel@todayszaman.com

The nature of the beast and of the CHP

It was true even of Britain’s great wartime leader Winston Churchill. It is the nature of the beast. No politician resigns while they are on top; they are forced out of office when they are no longer in control.
“All political careers end in failure,” said the very philosophical British politician Enoch Powell, who went on to add that this included his own. This adage is worth considering as we watch the leader of Turkey’s opposition party, Deniz Baykal, thrashing about in his death throes, wondering whether to hang on to the office he disgraced. He will not be the first politician who outstayed his welcome, and it is a slightly embarrassing spectacle watching him trying to salvage the nation’s respect. A politician with his trousers still round his ankles will always find it difficult walking gracefully out the door. As Powell might have said, “Some political careers end in greater failure than others.”

Let’s get the story straight. I do not share the Turkish prime minister’s high moral stand that Mr. Baykal’s adulterous affair of itself disqualifies him for high office. Indeed, Mr. Erdogan has made himself a hostage to fortune by declaring he would not tolerate such behavior among his own team. On the other hand, the opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP) may well consider that Turkey is no Italy or France, where the electorate turn a blind eye or even applaud the extramarital affairs of their leaders. Mr. Baykal’s truly unacceptable act was to make his mistress a parliamentarian. That, on the surface or at least until Mr. Baykal chooses to explain himself, is a show of contempt for the democratic selection process, let alone the cause of women’s dignity and equality, which his party is meant to champion.

Mr. Baykal continues to humiliate himself by not appearing to realize his tenure at the party he led for so long has come to its logical conclusion. He resigned but assumed that he’d quickly be back. In part this is because a hierarchy within the CHP so used to being beholden to his patronage felt unable to let him go. However, the party grandees have now got used to the idea that their former leader is damaged goods that it is becoming increasingly unlikely that there will be a stage-managed call for him to return. It is the nature of the beast as well that once support in a hierarchical system erodes, it erodes very quickly. The CHP’s natural allies in the press have long since migrated to supporting Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, the deputy who led a moderately spirited campaign as the CHP’s İstanbul mayoral candidate. The opinion polls they publish suggest that Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu is the only credible alternative and that he enjoys a head start in the uphill task of turning his party into a credible opposition to the current government. The growing assumption is that the delegates to the forthcoming CHP congress to elect a new leader will not follow their former leader in throwing themselves off a cliff. This sense of self-preservation may yet confound those who assumed Mr. Baykal’s departure would splinter his party into many pieces.

The reality is that the CHP has already splintered and Mr. Baykal managed to hang on to the reins for so long by forcing those factions who opposed him into the wilderness. He has been a unifying force only by stripping the CHP to a core faction that is far too small to ever win an election. The difficulty which faces his successor is how to expand that base. Political parties are meant to use their time in opposition as an opportunity to redefine their message and to reconnect to the country at large. It has long been the conventional wisdom that one of the great weaknesses of Turkish politics has been the failure of the Baykal-led CHP to do exactly that. The failure of the CHP to mount a respectable challenge during the general elections has legitimated the extra-parliamentary challenges to the government both from the courts and from the military. Mr. Kılıçdaroğlu may feel he has already moved a mountain in getting out front in the contest for the CHP leadership. If he is elected, he will have yet another mountain to move.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
27 March 2011
Whose model is it anyway?
24 March 2011
Front-page news
22 March 2011
Libya and the fashionable vice
20 March 2011
The end of bunga bunga politics?
17 March 2011
A nuclear melody
15 March 2011
A story in search of a moral
13 March 2011
Ergenekon cooks with pomegranates
10 March 2011
A sense of hurt
8 March 2011
Justice on trial
6 March 2011
Scary stuff
3 March 2011
Whither Turkey now?
1 March 2011
Necmettin Erbakan
27 February 2011
Building a political base
24 February 2011
Ten years on
22 February 2011
Europe, MENA and the biggest fish
20 February 2011
How many wrongs make a right?
17 February 2011
The deep state changes its image
15 February 2011
Sex, drugs, the crocus and a bee
13 February 2011
Pınar Selek
10 February 2011
Kanal 84
8 February 2011
‘Do as I say’
6 February 2011
Coffee break
3 February 2011
Dominoes versus okey
1 February 2011
Right makes might and vice versa
30 January 2011
The politics of everyday life
27 January 2011
The murder of İstanbul
25 January 2011
How to win the next election
23 January 2011
Points on the political compass
20 January 2011
What a robust Turkey brings to the table
18 January 2011
Welcome to political hell
16 January 2011
Turkey’s greatest threat
13 January 2011
Hrant Dink and Gabrielle Giffords
11 January 2011
Whose history is it anyway?
9 January 2011
Tweeting for God and country
6 January 2011
The headscarf and Kurdish rights
4 January 2011
Third Bosporus bridge? Transport for lemmings
2 January 2011
Zero problems with bags
30 December 2010
And the winner is…
28 December 2010
Man or Woman of the Year
26 December 2010
Sarah, Orhan Pamuk and Europe
23 December 2010
Chipping away at the government’s lead
21 December 2010
CHP shoots an arrow in the air
19 December 2010
Uncovering Komitas
16 December 2010
A democratic election?
14 December 2010
Bad vibrations
12 December 2010
An organization in search of a logo
9 December 2010
Fire-fighting diplomacy
7 December 2010
Leaking accountability
5 December 2010
WikiLeaks in Turkey -- Cui bono?
2 December 2010
Wikileakioğlu
30 November 2010
WikiLeaks: a strange interlude
28 November 2010
The calligrapher’s art -- then and now
25 November 2010
Creeping past the threshold
23 November 2010
The Boron Syndrome
21 November 2010
Turkey do’s and Turkey don’ts
16 November 2010
A NIMBY approach to Ergenekon
14 November 2010
Ruminations on ruminants
11 November 2010
The president gets a prize
9 November 2010
Beltwayology
7 November 2010
We resemble ourselves
4 November 2010
The bomb in Taksim Square
2 November 2010
A columnist bites the dust
28 September 2010
The Stuxnet Worm turns
26 September 2010
Tophane
23 September 2010
Turkey’s Ground Zero
21 September 2010
The Hrant Dink Award
19 September 2010
Referendum 2010 (it’s how you play the game)
14 September 2010
The morning after
12 September 2010
The referendum and Sunday lunch
9 September 2010
Dead cats can bounce
7 September 2010
Yes or no
5 September 2010
İstanbul 1910, European Capital of Change
2 September 2010
Referendum: no longer a done deal
31 August 2010
The great smear
29 August 2010
Asil Nadir -- a moral tale
26 August 2010
Yes, Minister
24 August 2010
Accountability, the referendum and Lame-Brain Pete
15 August 2010
Referendum risk
12 August 2010
‘No, No, Recep’
10 August 2010
The reform paradigm
8 August 2010
It’s (almost) too darn hot
5 August 2010
A referendum on what?
3 August 2010
Turkey through the looking glass
1 August 2010
Change Turkey can believe in?
29 July 2010
Cameron comes to town
27 July 2010
Analyze this
25 July 2010
The new Turkey
22 July 2010
Recovering in time for elections
20 July 2010
Giving the Kurdish question an answer
18 July 2010
İstancool (And not Constantinople)
15 July 2010
St. Augustine and Turkey’s opposition
13 July 2010
İstanbul, UNESCO and paving paradise
11 July 2010
A tutorial on tutelage
8 July 2010
What about the Kurds?
6 July 2010
Houston, we’ve got zero problems
4 July 2010
A chat in a Brussels hotel
1 July 2010
The politics of resentment
29 June 2010
Turkey, Iran and regime change
27 June 2010
A sudden case of adolescence?
24 June 2010
The hard task of drawing the line in the sand
...
Bloggers