Signs of a dangerous bipolarity in politics
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
20 June 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 September 2008, Friday 0 0 0 0
YAVUZ BAYDAR
y.baydar@todayszaman.com

Signs of a dangerous bipolarity in politics

As I hopefully will have reached Yerevan early this morning, not only to watch football, but to witness an unprecedented visit -- the first in history -- by a Turkish president, my initial intention was to write about glimpses of my earlier personal encounters with this mysterious, sad city and its sorrowful and deeply proud people, to comment about the true meaning of rapprochement between those who are truly Anatolians -- Armenians and Turks -- in that order.

I meant to express a wish, however unrealistic it may be, that President Abdullah Gül might pass beyond the threshold of denial and pray at the "Genocide Monument," mourning the tragic fate of Ottoman Armenians, who perished in the folly of war some 90 years ago.

Alas, the shaky agenda of Turkey never leaves you alone. Wherever you go, part of your mind is always kept occupied with the notion of "what's next?" And the puzzle of politics never leads to closure but only becomes more intriguing.

The main questions before me and my readers, as I understand it, is what to expect in the coming months of politics and where we stand in the ongoing, seemingly endless battle for power in "deep Ankara."

In a way, we have seen cards being reshuffled recently and that redistribution has begun. I am referring to some major turning points and minor events. With the Justice and Development Party (AKP) "having received a severe warning" -- to use an expression by a top court judge -- Turkey is to continue with a new top command, which made its stand clear in recent days on how much more deeply involved in politics the military will be. The picture is reminiscent of an older one depicting an arduous, uphill battle between the elected and the appointed.

The annual ceremony of the top command handovers told us the same story: filled with lengthy robot talk, it was, as some pro-military columnists already wrote, made "obvious even for those with differing levels of understanding" (referring to domestic and foreign observers who question the current military-civilian relations in Turkey) that issues linked with "sine qua non" of the republic will be kept under strict scrutiny by the military and that most of the matters related to the EU reform process were seen as unacceptable by those who are keen on the "unitary" nature of Turkey. In short, the top command says between the lines that the AKP should "forget" a new, liberal constitution.

There are symptoms of trouble already. I mentioned in an earlier article an apparent clash at the decision making level in Cyprus, where Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (KKTC) President Mehmet Ali Talat was sidelined by the Turkish military over a temporary opening of the border gate for Greek Cypriot worshipers, a minor scandal that could not have happened without the knowledge of İlker Başbuğ.

The other incident was a "political statement" by the top command: As reported extensively, two generals under arrest in the Ergenekon case were visited in prison by a three-star general two days ago in Kandıra. The fact that the visit was done under the orders of the top command and in the name of the chief of general staff is undoubtedly an intervention in the judicial process and likely to have significant consequences in the process of the criminal case.

Add to this a fresh survey on the "state of politics" in Turkey. Today's Zaman reported yesterday on the findings of a Metropoll survey, which somehow seems to confirm what I have been hearing from other "pulse-takers." Let's look at part of yesterday's story: "Asked who they would vote for if there was an election today, 50.9 percent of respondents said they would vote for the AK Party. The figure demonstrated the ruling party's considerable increase in popularity in less than a month, as around 42 percent of those polled had said in early August they would vote for the AK Party if parliamentary elections were to be held the day of the poll. The survey revealed that the CHP and the MHP would remain below the election threshold should general elections be held on the poll date. Only 9.5 percent of respondents said they would vote for the CHP; 6.6 percent said they would favor the MHP and 2.6 percent said they would vote for the Democratic Society Party (DTP)."

Metropoll is a serious opinion investigator. And what it tells us in this crucial segment is of serious concern. It tells us that a) regardless of the "vacuum" of political pledges, the AKP is simply rising; b) after distributing the undecided, the AKP now has around 60 percent of the vote; and c) the opposition is sliding severely, although two parties may pass the 10 percent threshold. The result, therefore, in the upcoming national elections would have to be the AKP dominating more than 90 percent of the municipalities.

With the lack of opposition, the center of antagonism may shift even more to the already tense area between the military and the AKP. Considering the apparent "change of route" of top command, together with the picture above taken by Metropoll, this all comes inevitably as a message for extreme "caution" -- if not alarm -- for Turkey.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
18 June 2013
AKP's voters into uncharted waters
16 June 2013
Wounded city, crushed dreams
13 June 2013
Ambiguity prevails, as do dangers
11 June 2013
Battle for the elms
9 June 2013
Bad seeds in the slime of old politics
6 June 2013
Existential watershed
4 June 2013
Hitting a road bump
2 June 2013
İstanbul's ‘one minute!' to Erdoğan
30 May 2013
Despite mistrust, ‘yes' to Kurdish peace
28 May 2013
Cause and effect
26 May 2013
Kulturkampf out in the open
23 May 2013
And the winner is…
21 May 2013
Destructive obsession with news control
19 May 2013
Building bridges in Los Angeles
16 May 2013
Driving each other to the edge
14 May 2013
Between anger and deception
12 May 2013
Morally right, but…
9 May 2013
Withdrawal welcome as challenges mount
7 May 2013
Things get complicated
5 May 2013
Syria: ‘The worst is yet to come'
2 May 2013
Priority: democracy or peace?
30 April 2013
Human catastrophe at our doorsteps
28 April 2013
Jazz all over İstanbul tomorrow
25 April 2013
‘Point of no return'
23 April 2013
Glasnost, Kurds, Armenians, 1915
21 April 2013
Not unlikely: CHP's ‘modernists' may cop out
18 April 2013
Finally, an awakening
16 April 2013
Prime minister and the piano player
14 April 2013
‘So what?'
11 April 2013
The long-distance handshake
9 April 2013
Despite doubts, PKK much closer to withdrawal
7 April 2013
Deadlock clears way to destination
4 April 2013
Doors open for PKK pull-out
2 April 2013
Negative selection
31 March 2013
Escalation under way
28 March 2013
Which one is it: division or solution?
26 March 2013
Which is tougher: reactivating EU or race against time?
24 March 2013
At last, back to regional logic
21 March 2013
Turkey's Kurdish spring: historic day full of hope, doubts
19 March 2013
Milliyet daily a lame duck, as media crisis deepens
17 March 2013
Nonsensical stay-away
14 March 2013
Between the island, mountains and the capital
12 March 2013
Crisis at a key newspaper
10 March 2013
Between mind-reading and realism
7 March 2013
Uludere: cover-up
5 March 2013
If Iraq is being pulled in …
3 March 2013
Samaras stuns Erdoğan
28 February 2013
Hard drives cry for action
26 February 2013
Merkel's visit marks a turn
24 February 2013
Organizing the caravan which moves
21 February 2013
Time to stop engineering religion
19 February 2013
To protect a global brand
17 February 2013
Three challenges for Obama
14 February 2013
Foxes strike back, set for trouble
12 February 2013
Will Erdoğan also hold hands in Uludere?
10 February 2013
Erdoğan's new way
7 February 2013
BDP, as usual, unaware of momentum
5 February 2013
A cautious race against time
3 February 2013
Turkey's left still obsessed with culture of violence
31 January 2013
Erdoğan shifts gears, pushes agenda further
29 January 2013
Doomed to be torn within
27 January 2013
Towards the Shanghai Five
24 January 2013
The ‘shadow state' unfolding
22 January 2013
Undue confusion, unnecessary tension
20 January 2013
For Birand
17 January 2013
After the funerals, a ground more solid
15 January 2013
Today's Zaman: six years of intense coverage
13 January 2013
South by southwest
10 January 2013
Before a farewell to arms
8 January 2013
Still under hypnosis, against each other
6 January 2013
‘Number 10 is missing from the team'
3 January 2013
Delays of the Turkish mind
1 January 2013
Back to basics
30 December 2012
Five conclusions of the past year
27 December 2012
2012 -- a year hijacked by Uludere's ghosts
25 December 2012
In politics for public interest, a year of disappointment
23 December 2012
Towards a Maliki-Assad alliance
20 December 2012
‘Abolish constitution and proceed’
18 December 2012
Will Turkey walk out on the EU?
16 December 2012
Earthquake at Taraf -- a new wound for journalism
13 December 2012
Inventory of official looting and shame
11 December 2012
Where Preston has it wrong and where he falls short
9 December 2012
Reset with the visa
6 December 2012
State of mental deficit
4 December 2012
Much ado about something?
2 December 2012
Unpredictables: Morsi and Netanyahu
29 November 2012
Like a bad joke
27 November 2012
Magnificent times
25 November 2012
Spinning the wheel
22 November 2012
General’s right to remain silent
20 November 2012
Bitter lesson for Obama
18 November 2012
It is over, but not really
15 November 2012
Erdoğan-Gül divide
13 November 2012
‘Living Together’ under capital punishment
11 November 2012
Viral injection into Ergenekon
8 November 2012
Four years of opportunities
6 November 2012
CPJ’s critical shortcoming
4 November 2012
Beware of the image
1 November 2012
AKP at crossroads: the historic paradox
30 October 2012
Threshold of endurance
...
Bloggers