TSK visit to Ergenekon suspects raises eyebrows
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
25 May 2013 Saturday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 September 2008, Friday 0 0 0 0
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
f.zibak@todayszaman.com

TSK visit to Ergenekon suspects raises eyebrows

A visit paid on Wednesday by a member of the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK), Kocaeli Garrison Commander Lt. Gen. Galip Mendi, to two suspects in the Ergenekon terrorist organization case, retired Gen. Şener Eruygur and retired Gen. Hurşit Tolon, who have been under arrest since July for alleged involvement in the Ergenekon gang, has been met with much amazement and skepticism in the Turkish media over the message the TSK meant to give.
The retired generals are accused of being members of the Ergenekon gang which is suspected of orchestrating various murders and attacks with the intention of creating chaos that would trigger a coup. A statement issued later by the TSK about the visit, saying that the visit to two retired generals who had served in the TSK for a long time was made on behalf of the TSK, raised further eyebrows on whether the TSK was standing up for the Ergenekon suspects, a step that is feared to influence the course of the judicial process in the Ergenekon case.

Zaman's Mümtaz'er Türköne says that although the TSK had stressed in its statement that it has full confidence in the Turkish judiciary in an attempt to avert criticism that the TSK wants to influence the judicial process in the Ergenekon case with this visit, this cannot prevent the interpretation of this visit as an intervention into an ongoing legal case. He contends that public officials who have weapons in their hands have a bigger responsibility vis-à-vis their loyalty to the law than other state officials who do not have weapons. "How can the prestige of a bureaucratic institution be preserved when it uses the power it has to bear arms -- granted to it to protect the country - to bestow privileges on its members in the face of the law?" asks Türköne.

Milliyet's Fikret Bila thinks the visit to the Ergenekon suspects was encouraged by new Chief of General Staff Gen. İlker Başbuğ as an attempt to erase the widespread belief held by the public that the TSK has abandoned the generals [Ergenekon suspects] who had spent years in fighting terrorism. In light of this, he interprets this visit as an indication of professional and institutional solidarity among TSK members.

Radikal's İsmet Berkan casts the visit as a "delayed attempt to intervene in the judiciary." He believes this because this visit was not made on behalf of a person but in the name of the TSK.

Sabah's Nazlı Ilıcak says that if Turkey were a country where the principles of democracy are operating smoothly, this visit and the TSK's attitude would not have much significance; however, this is not the case. Ilıcak wonders how new Chief of General Staff Gen. Başbuğ has allowed his name to be remembered as that of a general who backed retired generals involved in coup plans. "Turkey has changed. It is no longer that easy to stage a coup or to support it. I advise Gen. Başbuğ to take as an example retired Chief of General Staff Gen. Hilmi Özkök, who prevented coup attempts by generals within the TSK during his term, and not former Chief of General Staff Gen. Kenan Evren, the perpetrator of a military coup in 1980, and to not occupy Turkey's agenda with superficial issues," Ilıcak says.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
19 May 2013
Was Erdoğan's visit to the US fruitful?
5 May 2013
Peace on the horizon
14 April 2013
Reflections on the wise men commission
12 April 2013
The CHP and the settlement process
7 April 2013
Role of wise men commission
24 March 2013
Israel's apology
10 March 2013
Peace process on track
24 February 2013
Prospects for peace
17 February 2013
THY debate
27 January 2013
Reflections on the Cabinet reshuffle
6 January 2013
Hopes and PKK talks
23 December 2012
Controversy on separation of powers
16 December 2012
Controversial ATK report
25 November 2012
Nov. 24 and unappointed teachers
16 November 2012
BDP and the hunger strike
15 November 2012
Hunger strike conundrum
14 November 2012
Is Erdoğan serious?
13 November 2012
Reinstatement of capital punishment
12 November 2012
Presidential system
11 November 2012
Secret witness debate
28 October 2012
Democracy, republic reconciliation
21 October 2012
Kavakçı and Feb. 28
7 October 2012
Media's regret
5 October 2012
The meaning of the motion
4 October 2012
War with Syria?
3 October 2012
Gül-Erdoğan conflict?
2 October 2012
President Gül’s messages
1 October 2012
Erdoğan’s speech
2 September 2012
Erdoğan's disappointment
12 August 2012
Joy of Olympic success
29 July 2012
Police's honor
15 July 2012
AK Party-HAS Party merger
1 July 2012
A promising meeting
17 June 2012
Zana’s remarks
13 June 2012
A historic but belated move
3 June 2012
Abortion debate
20 May 2012
A different May 19
22 April 2012
YGS results and prejudices
8 April 2012
Confronting the Sept. 12 coup
25 March 2012
Turkey’s new anti-terrorism strategy
11 March 2012
Kurdish issue and the new constitution
4 March 2012
4+4+4 controversy
19 February 2012
Chaotic days for CHP
12 February 2012
Unusual days for Turkey
22 January 2012
Erdoğan's health
15 January 2012
May 19 debate
25 December 2011
Farewell to Aydın Menderes
19 December 2011
AK Party and next president
18 December 2011
The problem with France
16 December 2011
Rigging in ratings
15 December 2011
2014 scenarios
14 December 2011
An unnerving amendment
13 December 2011
Cübbeli’s case
12 December 2011
The fate of match-fixers
11 December 2011
Will violence against women ever end?
9 December 2011
Talk of AK Party division unrealistic, baseless
8 December 2011
Rift or asset of democracy?
7 December 2011
Risks for AK Party
6 December 2011
Turkish football’s test with match-fixing
5 December 2011
Fate of Turkish football
2 December 2011
Revisiting Dersim and Turkish history
1 December 2011
Gül’s choice
30 November 2011
Endless debate on Dersim
29 November 2011
President’s responsibility
28 November 2011
Confronting official history
27 November 2011
Miserable case of the CHP
25 November 2011
Kılıçdaroğlu’s failure in Dersim case
24 November 2011
Erdoğan’s apology
23 November 2011
Some happy, some still disappointed
22 November 2011
Is a new constitution so far away?
21 November 2011
Dim future for Kılıçdaroğlu
20 November 2011
The desperate case of the CHP
18 November 2011
The CHP’s test over the Dersim massacre
17 November 2011
The AK Party and claims of civilian tutelage
16 November 2011
The meaning of Mrs. Güzel’s ‘V’ sign
15 November 2011
Attacks on friendship
14 November 2011
Death or murder?
13 November 2011
Life after the earthquakes
9 November 2011
KCK operations: helping or hurting?
4 November 2011
KCK arrests highlight need for anti-terror law amendment
3 November 2011
KCK arrests
2 November 2011
A wounded psyche
1 November 2011
Controversial detentions
31 October 2011
Is the republic being weakened?
30 October 2011
Turkey debates Republic Day cancellations
28 October 2011
Lessons to take from the Van quake
27 October 2011
Murder network
26 October 2011
Racism knows no limits
25 October 2011
Scent of brotherhood
24 October 2011
Uniting over pain
23 October 2011
Gaddafi’s tragic end
21 October 2011
Why is Turkey failing to fight terrorism?
20 October 2011
Enough of violence
19 October 2011
Reflections on swap deal
18 October 2011
Wall Street protests
17 October 2011
Is peace far away?
16 October 2011
A fresh look at Golden Orange
14 October 2011
Why is the AK Party reluctant to address the headscarf ban?
13 October 2011
Kılıçdaroğlu’s credibility
12 October 2011
Is Atalay a mole?
...