Oil and diplomacy may not always mix
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
23 May 2013 Thursday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 August 2008, Wednesday 0 0 0 0
DOĞU ERGİL
d.ergil@todayszaman.com

Oil and diplomacy may not always mix

Rich in energy resources, the Caucasus and Central Asia have been since the end of the 19th century one of the scenes of major power competition and contention. The 20th century passed with Soviet domination of the region.
The West, especially the US, wanted to be a major if not the main actor in this theater after the collapse of the Soviet system. Their first aim was of course to access the rich oil and gas reserves of the region's nations, but their second aim was no less important: diverting oil around Russia and preventing Moscow from reasserting its control over the Caucasus and Central Asia. Georgia was chosen as the foremost pro-Western country for safe transportation of the enormous oil and gas wealth of the environing regions. So when the main pipeline that carries oil through Georgia was completed in 2005, it was hailed as a major success of the United States policy to have scored over Russia and diversified its energy supply, given the volatility of the Middle East.

Now energy experts say the hostilities between Russia and Georgia could threaten American plans to gain access to more of Central Asia's energy resources. At the other end of the continent are China and India, whose hunger for energy will keep competition for supplies tight, as well as increase pressure to hike oil and gas prices. Georgia and the Caucasus, under the watchful eyes of Russia -- with an imperial appetite that has lately proven not shy of resorting to military measures -- do not seem like the safe passage for oil and gas as was previously believed. Western states and multinationals as well as Central Asian and Caspian governments may now be more reluctant to build new lines or move large volumes through this corridor. One thing is sure: A Russia headed by a leader who sees his country's ascendance to global power through the monopolizing of energy resources and transportation lines and who has demonstrated his proclivity to use armed force to tame dissidents to that end will be the main actor in shaping the region's energy future. This reality poses a danger to the US and its Western allies' hopes of shifting their dependence on oil supplies from the Middle East to the Caucasus and Central Asia.

The latest Russian invasion of Georgia has left the American strategy aimed at driving a wedge between Russia and the old Soviet Central Asian countries in limbo. The success maintained by the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline could not be repeated in getting oil out of Kazakhstan through a non-Russia route. A great deal of oil from the rich Tengiz fields (Chevron is the biggest investor in this venture) passes through the northern Caspian coastline to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossiysk. This pipeline is called the Caspian Pipeline Consortium. It had alternative routes in the planning stage, but Russian pressure consolidated the present route.

Another fierce competition is likely to unfold, as oil from Kashagan -- the giant oil field in the Caspian Sea off Kazakhstan that holds over 10 billion barrels of reserves -- will be transported. Western companies attach a great deal of importance and commercial value to developing this new supply source, which will be operational in at least five years from now. The operating consortium, which includes Exxon Mobil and Conoco Phillips, plans to transport a major part of Kashagan oil through the BTC pipeline. This initiative requires building a new pipeline under the Caspian Sea that connects to the existing BTC, which ends at the Turkish port of Ceyhan. This oil is bound for Europe and eventually the United States. There is no doubt that the Russia that wants to be reinvented by its leader Putin as a "petrostate" will be unhappy and will oppose the initiative as it has done on previous occasions.

As long as Russia values her monopoly on oil and gas pipelines from the Caucasus and Central Asia, not only will she have her hand on the spigots, but she will also make it very difficult for the West to build a new westward pipeline.

So far, both the US and Europe thought that by co-opting regional states through their authoritarian leaders, commercial concerns and diplomacy would suffice to get the oil and gas out of these countries. This was Plan A. Russia's grip on Georgia and in general on the Caucasus proved this wrong. Now there is a need for Plan B. Plan what?!

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
20 May 2013
Syria in the eye of the beholder
19 May 2013
Syria between a rock and a hard place
14 May 2013
Syria exploding
12 May 2013
Awakening
7 May 2013
Iraq in turmoil (1)
5 May 2013
Questions and sincerity
30 April 2013
Poisonous questions
28 April 2013
Pride and Prejudice
23 April 2013
Scenes from Central Anatolia
21 April 2013
Official vs. Civic
16 April 2013
Iraqi Turkmens
14 April 2013
Oh Kurd (2)
9 April 2013
Oh Kurd (1)
7 April 2013
Oh Turk, (2)
2 April 2013
Oh Turk,
31 March 2013
Syria and Kurds
26 March 2013
Israel's apology
24 March 2013
Time to celebrate
19 March 2013
Meltdown
17 March 2013
A new phase in globalization
12 March 2013
A day for women
10 March 2013
EU membership: realities and aspirations
5 March 2013
The leak and the aftermath
3 March 2013
Where to tap?
26 February 2013
Syrian stalemate and the tragedy of inaction
24 February 2013
Presidency and the ‘grand peace’ offer
19 February 2013
Hope and caution
17 February 2013
Political perceptions
12 February 2013
Europe vs. Asia; elite vs. public
10 February 2013
Scenarios in the Syrian conflict
5 February 2013
Assessment of political and economic trends
3 February 2013
From Brussels to Shanghai
29 January 2013
Egypt and Iran
27 January 2013
‘Open Networks, Closed Regimes’
22 January 2013
Kurdish landscape is bustling
20 January 2013
Dividends of peace
15 January 2013
Peace with the dragon
13 January 2013
Dangers ahead
8 January 2013
Changes and challenges to understanding the Kurdish problem
6 January 2013
New year, new constitution?
1 January 2013
The 8 most interesting things we learned in 2012
30 December 2012
A 2012 account of Turkish foreign policy
25 December 2012
Interesting developments
23 December 2012
Iraqi prospects in Kurdish parentheses
18 December 2012
Turkey’s popularity in the Middle East
16 December 2012
Civil war in words and deeds
11 December 2012
Suicides in the army
9 December 2012
The pro-coup makeup in our DNA
4 December 2012
The secret army
2 December 2012
Violence against women
27 November 2012
The Kurdish house
25 November 2012
After the hunger strikes
20 November 2012
Is this a war?
18 November 2012
Life is a mirror: You get what you give
13 November 2012
Remembering and contemplating Atatürk
11 November 2012
Ending hunger strikes and political folly
6 November 2012
Elections and US foreign policy debate
23 October 2012
A slightly different competition
21 October 2012
Syria tough test for goals of ex-Ottomans
16 October 2012
Strategic depth (1)
9 October 2012
On war
7 October 2012
Another name for Syria: uncertainty
2 October 2012
Regional dynamics at play at the AKP congress
30 September 2012
The AKP congress
25 September 2012
Turkey, Israel and Egypt
23 September 2012
Systemic flaws
18 September 2012
On extremism
16 September 2012
Shadow boxing
11 September 2012
Tenacity of Syrian regime
9 September 2012
Questions and prejudices
4 September 2012
The Syrian enigma
2 September 2012
A bold new world?
28 August 2012
Here we stand?
26 August 2012
Questioning the Kurdish question
21 August 2012
US elections frivolous games
19 August 2012
One more time
14 August 2012
Syrian challenges
12 August 2012
Turkey’s Kurdish imbroglio as seen from outside
7 August 2012
Brotherhood?
5 August 2012
Syria unfolding
31 July 2012
Syria and Turkey: a friendship that went astray
29 July 2012
Whither goes the regime change in Syria
24 July 2012
Two-tier war in Syria
22 July 2012
Living with the hegemon
17 July 2012
Differing official rhetoric and common problems
15 July 2012
Turkey in the Syrian ‘problem’
10 July 2012
Strangers in their own land
8 July 2012
Russia and Israel on Syria
3 July 2012
The princess and the phoenix
1 July 2012
Reciprocity
26 June 2012
An intricate strategy
24 June 2012
Egypt’s hijacked spring
19 June 2012
Hopeful developments
17 June 2012
Dynamics of the Syrian conflict
12 June 2012
Kurdish issue redux
10 June 2012
The other world
5 June 2012
The abortion debate and beyond
3 June 2012
Conquest and discovery
29 May 2012
NATO’S near future
27 May 2012
Qualities of power
...