The only game in town
 
 
  |  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
  |  
21 May 2013 Tuesday
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 27 April 2008, Sunday 0 0 0 0
İHSAN YILMAZ
ihsan.yilmaz@todayszaman.com

The only game in town

It is becoming clear that a military coup is almost impossible in Turkey. If one reason is the lack of international approval of such a dreadful betrayal of democracy, the other is reason is Turkish society's current level of democratic maturity, which includes a high level of urbanization, modernization and economic development and which benefits from the information age.
 All military coups in the country have always sought popular approval and some sort of legitimacy. In today's Turkey it is impossible to get any legitimacy or popular approval. Old tactics no longer work, but there are still some who dream that democracy is not the only game in town. They are wrong.

If you follow the declarations of the National Security Council (MGK), you will see that its members are more concerned about the real dangers, challenges and opportunities that the nation faces. There is a considerable gap between the main messages of these declarations and the rhetoric of the militarist ultranationalists who have some connections in the armed forces. Yet, their connections and affiliates in the armed forces do not have the upper hand, and they are not in a position to influence the mainstream strategies of both the army and the MGK. For instance, they have not been able to stop the MGK from declaring that all groups in Iraq -- read the untouchable Kurds of northern Iraq -- are approachable and can be entered into diplomatic relations with. This is what democratic common sense has been dictating for years, but which the hard-liners and hawks have resisted. Ultranationalists must see that they are now obviously in a cul de sac and that even in military terms there is no exit.

There have, of course, been other signs that support this argument. Even the simple fact that generals can no longer openly meddle in daily politics either by e-memos or messages given at balls shows that they are aware of the people's objection to their undemocratic behavior. In the past they clumsily justified their interference into everyday politics by placing everything under the sky within the ambit of national security. But they abused this method so many times that they have lost their credibility and gave up resorting to these tactics. Moreover, people have started saying that if national security is so central to our lives, why don't we as voters and taxpayers also talk about it every day and discuss, say, the military budget and expenditures?

Another sign showing that there isn't a military option for ultranationalists is their almost lunatic and still unbelievable resort to a judicial coup against the democratically elected government. The mere fact that they could consider a coup following the 367 (vote) fiasco is more than telling. Generals have lost their credibility in influencing the democratic daily running of the country. All the old guard can now do is resort to suicidal judicial attacks and threaten the government with a coup, although even they know very well that they cannot stage a bloodless coup without seriously risking the unity of the army and the nation. As everything is transparent, the government can see this as well, and they are not giving in. Being aware of this, militarist ultranationalists are now saying that it would be desirable if the Constitutional Court does not shut down the party but still penalizes it. Even this change of rhetoric shows that they are also aware that democracy is the only game in town and that there is no turning back from democracy. All they want is to continue to have their undemocratic share of power in the government by keeping the general constitutional structure of the state untouched.

Yet, they seem to be forgetting one crucial fact. The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) has not created or socially engineered this democratic society. They are not the cause, but the result of the democratic maturity and agility of the society, triggered by the Turgut Özal era. That is why you either love or hate Özal. If the AK Party leadership -- betraying the nation's trust -- decides to negotiate with the undemocratic dark forces, the nation will still march on despite them and they will be thrown into the dustbin of history.

Columnists Previous articles of the columnist
17 May 2013
Turkey, US and Russia on Syria
15 May 2013
Reyhanlı, the next 25 years and Alevis
10 May 2013
Politicians, privileges and Islamic law
8 May 2013
Politicians and corruption in Turkey
3 May 2013
Polarization
1 May 2013
Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul
26 April 2013
1915 (2)
24 April 2013
1915 (1)
19 April 2013
From Islamism to either post-Islamism or ‘lost Islamism'
17 April 2013
Erdoğan: both an asset and a liability for the new Turkey
12 April 2013
Disappointment in Turkish Islamists vis-à-vis press freedoms
10 April 2013
The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel
3 April 2013
‘General Will,' Kemalists and neo-Kemalists
29 March 2013
Practicing Muslims and social (in)justice
27 March 2013
Wise men?
22 March 2013
Öcalan, PKK, AKP, Erdoğan
20 March 2013
From Hasan Cemal
15 March 2013
The İmralı peace process and defaming Hizmet
13 March 2013
Freedom of the press in Turkey
8 March 2013
Criticizing authoritarian tendencies and practices of today
6 March 2013
Apo TV
1 March 2013
Turkish nationalism and my Said Nursi
27 February 2013
I am not a nationalist
22 February 2013
Modern age slavery and practicing Muslims
20 February 2013
The new constitution and social-engineering the “best” citizen
15 February 2013
How my message was distorted by a Western ‘journalist'
13 February 2013
Practicing Muslims, human rights and global Hilf al-Fudul
8 February 2013
Caring for the 42 percent, the new constitution and Abant spirit
6 February 2013
Shanghai criteria, the EU and our Islamists
1 February 2013
Social (in)justice in Turkey
30 January 2013
Quality of academics and scholars in Turkey
25 January 2013
The Kurdish initiative, the AKP and losing the Kurds
18 January 2013
In memory of Mehmet Ali Birand
9 January 2013
Practicing Muslims and negotiating with the Kurdists
4 January 2013
Practicing Muslims' old and new problems with meritocracy
2 January 2013
Meritocracy and practicing Muslims
28 December 2012
Erdoğan and Ergenekon: two options
26 December 2012
Kemalo-Islamists
21 December 2012
Taxation, social justice, neo-liberalism, AKP and the Turkish Islamists
19 December 2012
Taraf and its enemies
14 December 2012
AKP and the Kurdish problem
12 December 2012
Turkish readings of Egyptian politics
7 December 2012
The AKP and the religious Kurds
5 December 2012
The ‘Patriots’ and the difficulty of being a Turkish Islamist
30 November 2012
The Palestinian state
28 November 2012
Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia
23 November 2012
Israeli brutality and the democratic gap in the Middle East
21 November 2012
‘Sacred, Secular, Twin Tolerations and the Hizmet’
16 November 2012
Syria, Israel and Turkey’s predicaments in the Middle East
9 November 2012
Failure of post-Islamism and construction of official Islam
7 November 2012
Who is tarnishing Turkey’s image?
2 November 2012
AKP as both asset, liability to worldwide Muslim politics
31 October 2012
The miserable opposition
24 October 2012
Qurbani in the Islamophobic Turkish media
19 October 2012
Kurdish villagers, Erdoğan and Gül
17 October 2012
The difficulty of criticizing the AKP
12 October 2012
Crying for the terrorists
10 October 2012
Positive signs at the İstanbul Forum
5 October 2012
Syrian cul-de-sac and remembering Cyprus 1974
3 October 2012
2023 vision: excellent; 2013 vision: absent
28 September 2012
Understanding Balyoz officers: the military as a total institution
26 September 2012
Anti-Erdoğanism and 2014
21 September 2012
Difficulty of being critical
19 September 2012
Reforming the army?
14 September 2012
Criticizing Hizmet
12 September 2012
MİT, the army, the Foreign Ministry and I
7 September 2012
Is Davutoğlu the culprit?
5 September 2012
Erdoğan and the PKK, his Achilles’ heel
31 August 2012
AKP, Hizmet and politics
29 August 2012
Defeating the AKP in elections?
24 August 2012
Silent intellectuals and talking to the PKK?
22 August 2012
The PKK and speaking the unspeakable
17 August 2012
The PKK and the people’s wish
10 August 2012
A failed fairy tale of a poor imprisoned German-Turk
9 August 2012
Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet Movement
8 August 2012
Turkish ‘discovery’ of Islamist Iran’s nationalism
3 August 2012
7 arrows of Kemalo-Islamism
1 August 2012
The AKP and the Alevi problem in Turkey
27 July 2012
Zero problems with (Kurdish) neighbors?
25 July 2012
Mor Gabriel Monastery and the new AKP
20 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (2)
18 July 2012
AKP: a religious Kemalist party? (1)
13 July 2012
AKP: No longer a democratizing force
11 July 2012
Domestic humanistic depth: missing dimension of Turkish foreign policy
6 July 2012
Turkish foreign policy: Quo vadis?
4 July 2012
Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet
29 June 2012
Syria and Turkish foreign policy
27 June 2012
Syria: winner take all?
22 June 2012
Abant Platform: perspectives on Turkey
20 June 2012
Hizmet and the Kurdish question
13 June 2012
‘Shallow-land’
8 June 2012
Kurdish issue, AKP and MHP
6 June 2012
Pluralism in Turkey and Islamism
1 June 2012
AKP: reverting back to Islamism?
30 May 2012
Revisiting the AKP
25 May 2012
The Egyptian elections, Islam and Islamists
23 May 2012
Who has infiltrated the Turkish state?
18 May 2012
Are there a few Hizmet(s)?
16 May 2012
The game against Hizmet
11 May 2012
Why do we need a presidential system?
...