|  
  |  
  |  
  |  
RSS
  |  
  |  
May 21, 2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
Columnists 05 April 2007, Thursday 0 0 0 0
İHSAN DAĞI
i.dagi@todayszaman.com

Will the EU suspend negotiations with Turkey over coup talks?

This question may seem utterly irrelevant and even absurd given the opening of the second negotiation chapter last week in Brussels. However it is not the deadlock over the opening of Turkish harbors to Greek Cypriot vessels, but the evolving tone of civil-military relations that may lead to a complete suspension of the negotiations process.
Revelations by Nokta newsweekly about two possible military coups planed in 2004 by high-level military commanders are hard to digest for Turkey and the EU. If these reports, which have not been effectively denied, are true then while Turkey was taking historic steps to meet EU accession criteria, there were some in the military -- in fact, the commanders of the four major branches of the military -- preparing a detailed plan for a takeover.     

It’s hard to believe. Anyhow we will see all this in the regular report to be prepared by the European Commission toward the end of this year that questions the commitment that Turkish institutions have for democracy.

Will the commission report suggest suspension of negotiations? I do not rule out such a possibility, but am inclined to wait and see the attitude of the military high-command toward the presidential and parliamentary elections. Even something short of a direct interference of the military in this process may persuade the EU circles to say enough is enough. But a high-profile military presence in Turkish politics may also give rise to a completely different response if it is perceived by Western circles that the military’s high visibility is engineered to cut off the accession process.

Let’s not forget that accession negotiations are based on Turkey’s performance in regards to the Copenhagen political criteria, which is not criteria fulfilled once for all time, but rather criteria continuously fulfilled. It sets the condition for EU countries as achieving “stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.”

Can we claim that we have “stability of institutions,” guaranteeing democracy as long as we think, talk and fear a military coup? I raised this question in this column some two weeks ago, warning that while debating about the upcoming presidential elections we should keep the Copenhagen criteria in mind.

It appears that despite all the efforts for reform over the last six years we are still far from satisfying the Copenhagen political criteria in terms of the stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

Where are those institutions?

While the judiciary is supposed to be the guardian of rights and freedoms of the citizens, it chose to be the vanguard of an outdated model of Kemalism. They are more interested in keeping their privileges, as displayed during the debate last week on the elections of new members for the Supreme Council.

Are all political parties, supposedly the foundations of a democratic regime, committed to democracy and its corollary, the supremacy of national will? It is hard to say yes. Some, having no hope for election success, are calling on “dynamic forces” -- for which read military -- to be part of the political process, including the election of the next president.

What about the military? It has nothing to do with all of these only if some of its personnel at the highest level stop contemplating a coup and attempting to manipulate civil society and the media!

While independent media are doing a great job of uncovering coup attempts, others are more interested in who leaked these secret “military” documents in an attempt to divert the public’s attention away from the content of the document. The universities? They are busy forcing their students to attend demonstrations organized by militarist associations with anti-democracy and anti-EU views.

Given all this, I do think that Turkey is likely to encounter fundamental problems with its EU accession in the near future. The only hope is that the EU will appreciate the fact that consolidation of democracy in Turkey requires keeping Turkey’s EU ambitions alive. However we can not rely on the goodwill of the Europeans, but instead must do our part of the job.

Therefore these reports should be thoroughly investigated in order to consolidate Turkish democracy. If the judiciary does not do its part, as pointed out by Prime Minister Erdoğan on Wednesday, a parliamentary committee should be set up to investigate these claims. Then Turkey’s historic march toward EU accession may continue uninterrupted.

BÜLENT KENEŞ BÜLENT KENEŞ
If democracy had ever come, it wouldn't have gone away!
ABDULLAH BOZKURT ABDULLAH BOZKURT
İşbank and the CHP
EKREM DUMANLI EKREM DUMANLI
Virtual madness
GÖKHAN BACIK GÖKHAN BACIK
The air wars in the Middle East and Turkey
EMRE USLU EMRE USLU
Turkey and hidden fanaticisms
BERK ÇEKTİR BERK ÇEKTİR
A change in the spirit of the May 19 celebrations
MARKAR ESAYAN MARKAR ESAYAN
May 19 and the characteristics of reforms
CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON CHARLOTTE MCPHERSON
What is your favorite Turkish dish?
SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL SEYFETTİN GÜRSEL
What should we do with a president elected by a general vote?
İHSAN DAĞI İHSAN DAĞI
Changing positions in Turkish politics
ÖMER TAŞPINAR ÖMER TAŞPINAR
The story behind the story and US lobbies
YAVUZ BAYDAR YAVUZ BAYDAR
Erdoğan was not ‘hostile’ to Israel
ŞAHİN ALPAY ŞAHİN ALPAY
‘Positive agenda' from the EU most welcome
FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK
A different May 19
AMANDA PAUL AMANDA PAUL
Turkey and the EU: a new positive agenda?
Weather
City>>
ISTANBUL
Today Tue Wed
14C°
22C°
15C°
25C°
16C°
23C°